More handpicked essays just for you.
The civil right act of 1964 and the impact in the society
Civil rights act of 1964 argumentive
Civil rights act of 1964 argumentive
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Transcript of Civil Liberties & the Civil Rights Court Cases Assignment Civil Liberties & the Civil Rights Court Cases Assignment Gideon v Wainright Dates: Argued January 15, 1963 Decided March 18, 1963 Background: Charged in a Florida State Court with a non capital felony, petitioner appeared without funds and without counsel and asked the Court to appoint counsel for him, but this was denied on the ground that the state law permitted appointment of counsel for indigent defendants in capital cases only. Mapp v. Ohio Dates : Argued March 29, 1961
Wainwright deserved no less attention than it got, although some say it didn’t. The case definitely should have gone to The Supreme Court and it deserved no less than a unanimous 9-0 vote by the Justices. Gideon also should have been proved not guilty in his second trial. Even though he did rob the pool hall he was not given a fair trial for his consequences so he didn’t have to face the consequences. The Gideon v. Wainwright case also violated the 6th and 14th amendment.
Then Gideon tried to defend himself, but like many of us, he could not defend very well so was found guilty. He then was sentenced to imprisonment. Then Gideon applied to the state supreme court with a Writ of Habeas Corpus on the ground that the conviction violated his sixth amendment right. The Florida State Supreme Court then reviewed his case and agreed with the lower court. Gideon was not eligible to receive an attorney from the state.
Gideon was undoubtedly found guilty of the crime and was sent to prison. While he sat in a Florida prison, Gideon felt that his constitutional right to have an attorney was not granted. Thus, Gideon formulated an appeal to the Supreme Court handwritten on prison paper. The Supreme Court accepted his documents and decided to hear his case. Prior to Gideon vs Wainwright, Betts vs Brady was the case doctrine that was followed.
Gideon challenges the Florida court decision, and he decides to researched books about law to figure a way to overturn the court’s decision. Gideon makes the Due Process Law his way to fix the wrongdoing of the lower court. At the end, Gideon finally completes all the forms that he needed, and
Gideon v. Wainwright was a 1963 landmark case in the United States Supreme Court. The court case involved the right to counsel under the Fifth and Sixth Amendment that eventually lead to a fundamental right. The Supreme Court eventually ruled that states are required under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to provide an attorney to defendants in criminal cases who are unable to afford their own attorneys. On June 3,1963 in Panama City, Florida a man known by Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested and charged with breaking and entering a poolroom in Florida with the intent to commit a misdemeanor offense therefore, he was charged with a felony. Clarence Earl Gideon was a poor man from Florida who ran away from home at a early age and was also under educated and had dyslexic throughout his life.
Finally, Wayne Williams took the stand and testified, which resulted in very unfavorable attention from the jury (The Atlanta, n.d.). His angry and combative demeanor on the witness stand left jury members with little sympathy (The Atlanta, n.d.). It only took the jury approximately ten hours to deliberate and reach a guilty verdict, however, if the fiber evidence was not presented I do not believe the deliberation would have been so quick and most likely would have resulted in a not guilty
170 (1974) & 509 F. 2d 227 (1974). After his conviction, William’s confronted the United States District Court for release on habeas corpus. The District Court and Court of Appeals deemed the questionable evidence should not have been used in trial. Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387 (1977) Certiorari was granted after review, holding that that incriminating statements from the defendant noted by Detecting Leaming were in fact a right to counsel violation.
Both men were successful in their appeals as a verdict of guilty could not be settled upon as the case was based on improbabilities and circumstantial evidence that could not lead to a definite
Even with his efforts, the jury still found Gideon guilty. He was sentenced to five years in prison. While in jail, in the library he researched about the Sixth Amendment, how the defendants should have the right to an attorney even when they cannot afford one and the law.. To try and change that, Gideon petitioned a habeas corpus. A habeas corpus is a writ requiring a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or into court to secure the person’s release unless lawful grounds are shown for their detention.
Alabama (1932) is Gideon v. Wainwright (1963). This case built on the example established in Powell v. Alabama and further clarified the right to legal counsel for criminal defendants. In Gideon v. Wainwright, Florida charged Gideon with breaking and entering, but refused him counsel because Florida only provided free lawyers for those charged with capital offenses. The Supreme Court ruled that all defendants in a criminal case have the right to a legal counsel, regardless of their ability to pay. This ruling helped to ensure that defendants are able to arrange an effective defense in court and highlighted the importance of equal access to
Clarence Darrow came to defend scopes. he had a agnostic view on religion and believe evolution is a important to know about. on the state 's side was William Bryan and christian who believed the bible should be thought of in a literal sense and evolution was a dangerous and would lead to a social movement. Just by knowing this it should have been a mistrial based on the fact that the state attorney 's main argument was that it goes against the literal interpretation of the bible because it 's obviously mixing church and state. Just to show you how silly this argument is heres some quotes from the bible Leviticus 19:27 states: “Ye shall not round the corners of your heads, neither shalt thou mar the corners of thy beard”.
Finally, this last case, Gideon v. Wainwright, helped strengthen our 6th amendment right. Clarence Earl Gideon broke into a Florida pool hall and stole some beverages and about $5. He was arrested and informed the officers he could not afford a lawyer.
and that the court was not independent. The court entered pleas of “not guilty” on their behalf when the defendants refused to plead. Three civil society activists and human rights defenders did not boycott the trial. They pleaded “not guilty” and presented their defence.
Wainwright illustrated the importance of personal rights guaranteed by the constitution. This case began when Clarence Gideon was denied a court appointed lawyer to represent him in a petty crime case. Gideon, unable to afford his own lawyer, was unable to adequately defend himself and consequently was convicted. However, he was undeterred. Gideon then wrote a letter to the Supreme Court to overturn this conviction with the 6th Amendment as his evidence of the court’s misconduct.
