ipl-logo

Globalization: Opposing Viewpoints By Louise I Gerdes

685 Words3 Pages

Globalization Book Review The book I chose to read for this term is called Globalization: Opposing Viewpoints written by Louise I. Gerdes. Globalization covers a multitude of things related to the topic. Comprised of an array of works from various writers - some of political influence, others of high economic status as well as varying on the political spectrum – talking about the causes and effects of globalization as a whole. In the beginning of the novel, we are given a preface to the types of information being contained within. The author uses brief points addressed by different sides of the issue to better illustrate the diversity of ideas within the book. As stated on page 14 on the third paragraph: “Globalization opponents, however, …show more content…

The ideas are separated into chapters pondering the affect globalization has on society, the global community, developing nations, and inferior/superior policies pertaining to the topic. These ideas develop within their respective chapter as they are discussed through sub-categorical means dissecting the main chapter title: “Globalization Is Beneficial to Society”, “Globalization is Harmful to Society”, “Globalization Promotes War”, “Globalization Promotes Peace” …etc. These are just a few of the sub-categories within the different chapters. Enclosed by on the of works of “Globalization is Beneficial to Society”, Abbas J. Ali (author of that particular piece), advances the conceptualization of the term by examining the bias it can be viewed with. He states: “…consider globalization not as a collective journey but as exclusive privileges for the elites…” while later stating “Globalization symbolizes commitment and desire for a better future. It conveys optimism and offers infinite possibilities for growth, renewal, and revitalization.” These quotes help develop the idea of globalization and its different uses as being a collective beneficiary to societal wealth or a privilege of the …show more content…

This characterization is not entirely brought upon the reader by Gerdes, but also brought by the authors of the pieces he has featured. While he uses the sub-categorical titles to reveal the bias of the next piece, giving the reader an idea of whether what they are going to read is negative or positive. From phrases such as “does not” or “harmful” and using their natural negation to portray the authors as negative towards the topic, Gerdes secretly influences the reader as to what tone they read the text in. This holds true with positive outlooks. However, this does not mean that the negative is actually positive and vice versa, this only points to the ability of Gerdes to influence the entire tone of a piece by using just a

Open Document