ipl-logo

Glory Of Achilles In Book 24 Of The Iliad

1056 Words5 Pages

“The main point of Book 24 is to convey that the glory of Achilles is secure, thanks to Zeus”, writes an anonymous author in an essay from 123Helpme.com. While I can see why they have developed this perspective, I will have to disagree. Homer provides his readers with many details which contradict this anonymous writer’s point of view. With that being said, Achilles’ glory was not secured, thanks to Zeus, and I think the main point of book 24 of The Iliad is to demonstrate Achilles’ transformation. Initially, we receive a glimpse of Apollo expressing to the gods about how awful Achilles is because of his actions toward Hector’s corpse and how Hector was a better individual than Achilles. He says “…Has Hector never burned for you thighs of …show more content…

Book 24 ended with Hector’s burial. This moment left the readers feeling a tremendous loss. Hector’s body is at last given the respect it merits, and he passes on dearest and commended by his kin. However, we realize that his kin are damned, and that the truce allowed by Achilles is just a deferment of the inescapable. Although its residents have been faithful to the divine beings, the city of Troy will die, and the Achaeans will manage their people fiercely. On occasion, Homer lauds parts of war, portraying its energy to get out the best of his legends. Under the states of fighting, men find already obscure wellsprings of fearlessness, forfeit, and dependability. Be that as it may, Homer completes the Iliad with a burial service for an incredible man, went to by his disastrous individuals, and the tone is overwhelmingly one of distress. Essentially, the last looks of both the Achaeans and the Trojans indicate the two gatherings in grieving, and the last snapshots of the sonnet delineate the destined Trojans as opposed to the successful Achaeans. Our last memory of the Iliad is of these bound individuals, who have effectively lost so much and now should grieve their champion. What's more, still, even after all that the Trojans have persisted, we realize that the most noticeably bad of their misery is yet to come. Even though the people of Troy have this …show more content…

He no longer has the rage the he had in Book 1. With Priam, Achilles can make the immense jump of sympathy. He sees his own dad in the elderly king, and he abruptly comprehends the anguish that he has caused for the old man and others like him, a grieving father for each man that he has slaughtered. The disclosure drives him into sobbing, for what he has done and what he has lost. Finally, Achilles has moved from fierceness to sympathy. Never again is he cut off from mankind, holding up by the boats as his companions kick the bucket in distress, or longing for the craving of a creature as he remains over a mercilessly killed casualty. His distress now is more profound and more altruistic, far less egotistical and self-ingested than it has ever been before. In understanding what he has taken from Priam, Achilles goes to a more profound comprehension of what he himself has lost. This development of soul is the focal point story of the Iliad, and it recognizes Achilles as the main character who encounters a transformative change in his comprehension of himself and his reality. He is still irritable. We see this attribute when he debilitates Priam, and again when he fears that in the event that he is incited he may lose control and mishandle the privileges of the suppliant. However, in the ways that check most, Achilles is a changed man.

Open Document