ipl-logo

Goals Of Sentencing Essay

443 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Purpose of sentencing essay

Explain the goals of sentencing. Identify several criteria used in determining the appropriate sentence. What constitutional rights exist during sentencing?

While a trail jury can determine innocence or guilt Judges decide on the punishments for a specific crime. The Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment, provides that "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." In addition to the sentencing prohibitions in the Constitution, Title 18 of the United States Code, Part II also governs sentencing in federal courts. Likewise, state court sentencing procedures are governed by state laws and constitutions. There can be aggravating and mitigating circumstances to consider. Most crimes are broken down in statutes, and the provision that identifies the specific crime will also identify the appropriate punishment. For example, a statute may read, "Violation of this statute constitutes a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine not to exceed $500 or imprisonment not to exceed 30 days, or both." Given this variety of punishments, a judge will then consider all the circumstances to determine where along the prescribed range a particular criminal 's punishment should fall. There are a lot of factors considered by judges. Like whether the offender is a "first-time" or repeat offender, if the defendant was an accessory or the culprit, whether the offender committed the crime under stress or duress, whether anyone was hurt, …show more content…

Of course each case is unique but there are guidelines to follow.

The 8th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. (n.d.). Retrieved October 05, 2017, from https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/amendments/amendment-viii

18 U.S. Code Chapter 227 - SENTENCES. (n.d.). Retrieved October 05, 2017, from

Show More
Related
789 Words | 4 Pages

This is where the defendant enters a plea (guilty, not guilty or no contest) (Schmalleger, 2015). In this case the defendant plead not guilty until his sentence was carried out and he was electrocuted. It is stated in our text book that, adjudication, or trial by jury, is where it states in the U.S Constitution in the 6th amendment where every criminal offender has the right to a trial by a jury (Schmalleger, 2015). In this case the defendant had a jury trial that lasted five weeks and they found him guilty of the murder of Charles Jr. According to our digital text book, sentencing happens once an offender had been convicted of a crime, the authority of a judge to enforce punishment on the offender happens at this time and a sentence may take many forms upon a judge’s decision (Schmalleger, 2015).

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

There are quite a few things I am not allowed to discuss, due to confidentiality, but the things that I can discuss are the observations of court hearings, pre-trials, and revocation hearings. I found it to be very interesting how the judge informs the offender of his or her rights under the United States Constitution before the offender states whether guilty or not and that if the offender pleads guilty that his or her rights are then taken and would rest in the federal courts hands. Usually when the offender pleads guilty, they are under oath, being recorded, and tend to get the lesser sentence, but that is not always the case. It just depends on the case and what all is involved as far as the crime committed and the offender’s history. If the offender pleads not guilty, then there will be a trial that forms on a later date.

Read More
550 Words | 3 Pages

The Three Strikes Law states that a penalty enhancement should be handed down to anyone who had previously been convicted of one or more supposedly serious or violent felonies. Under the same laws, an offender who had previously been convicted of a violent or serious felony, regardless of how diminished it may be, face the risk of double-sentencing under the guidelines of the second strike. On the other hand, a third- strike sentencing guideline is applied when an offender with two or more previous crimes is convicted. Under this guideline, a minimum of twenty-five years to life is applied. However, for the third-strike sentence to be passed, the previous crimes committed must be either violent or serious.

Read More
1094 Words | 5 Pages

This will create a situation where there are no set rules and, depending on what the judge thinks is a crime, sentences will vary by degrees based on the jurisdiction that the offense is tried in. Consistency in law is an important part of the American legal

Read More
947 Words | 4 Pages

Does the eighth amendment allow this? The eighth amendment is meant to protect our nation's people from excessive bail, excessive fines, and cruel and unusual punishment. The meaning and purpose of the eighth amendment has made an enduring impact on our nation. Meaning and Purpose of the Eighth Amendment To begin with, the eighth amendment is very important to the constitution.

Read More
1718 Words | 7 Pages

This is a model that allows people to get what they deserve, however it is lead by restraint. Restraint allows for a delay in order to deliberate and decide on a punishment that fits the crime nicely rather than being over or under sized. By allowing an outside source to view the case, the goal is that both sides points are understood and taken into account. Questions are asked such as what is enough? How far is too far?

Read More
1092 Words | 5 Pages

To be more specific, nowadays criminal law cases are more and more complex. There are various types of charges and offenses, like drug crimes, white-collar crimes, and cybercrimes, etc. Due to this complexity, most of the punishments recommended in fixed sentencing guidelines do not serve the purpose of the U.S. Code. For instance, Derrick Kimbrough was accused of producing and selling cocaine (Yeh and Doyle). Generally, the judge is required to impose a minimum sentence of 228 to 270 months of imprisonment for such crimes, according to the Federal Sentencing Act.

Read More
1798 Words | 8 Pages

Introduction Crime, its punishment, and the legislation that decides the way in which they interact has long been a public policy concern that reaches everyone within a given society. It is the function of the judicial system to distribute punishment equitably and following the law. The four traditional goals of punishment, as defined by Connecticut General Assembly (2001), are: “deterrence, incapacitation, retribution, and rehabilitation.” However, how legislature achieves and balances these goals has changed due to the implementation of responses to changing societal influences. Mandatory minimum sentences exemplify this shift.

Read More
1559 Words | 7 Pages

Most criminals were given only broad maximum terms of (state of being locked in a prison). If federal judges were selected/hired to deliver any sentence, the sentence would go from probation to the law-related highest possible value. No meaningful (taking a court case to a higher court for review) of the sentence was available to the offender. With the judges meeting up to make their final legal decision, each judge 's individual ideas/plans of justice and views of the purposes of sentencing, and sentences for almost the same offenses varied very much depending on the identity of the sentencing judge. Also, the system was not limited to sentencing judges.

Read More
195 Words | 1 Pages

1. The five goals of contemporary criminal sentencing is retribution, incapacitation, deterrence, rehabilitation and restoration. The goal of retribution is to take revenge on a criminal. The goal of incapacitation is to imprison or other means to reduce the likelihood that an offender will commit future offenses.

Read More
1248 Words | 5 Pages

Sentencing disparity within the American Judicial system is a problem that exists across the nation. According to Merriam Webster’s dictionary, disparity means the markedly distinct in quality or character. Many times, disparity is used in conjunction with discrimination as if the two words mean the same, but they do not. Disparity will include a difference in treatment or outcome but is not based on an opinion, bias or prejudice.

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

For example, the punishments depend on the crime. If a wife fights with her husband, leaves her husband, ruins her house, or neglects her husband, this woman shall be thrown into the river in the Hammurabi’s code. If someone murders someone in the modern law, they have a sentence in jail. Sentences in jail also depend on the crime and its severity. Another way that they are similar is the way that they both maintain order.

Read More
441 Words | 2 Pages

Ashworth, 2005, p.207). Now for those who are a reoccurring offender that when the Judges should imply a harsher sentencing to recidivism, deterrence, rehabilitation, and retribution (Miller & Wright, 2005,

Read More
547 Words | 3 Pages

Criminal behaviour has always been an interest for psychologists, for they could never quite come to a conclusion between nature and nurture. Research concerning this topic has been organized for many years and due to the never ending debate, is still being conducted. I have decided to read and write about this myself, for I was genuinely curious about the matter and wanted to be a part of the research, as I felt responsible to do so. I believe that in order to stop something, it must be discussed and scrutinized. What effects do genes have on criminal behaviour, why do peer pressure and habitat influence a person to commit crimes and are men really more violent than women?

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

In the criminal justice system, the corrections component is also responsible for the rehabilitation of the convicted individual. It is their duty to attempt to make the defendant a productive member of society once again. Based on the individual’s behavior while incarcerated, the court and corrections officials may decide to place them on parole, which ensures that the individual will comply with the rules of society once they are fully released from the system. The criminal justice system is an essential role in the organizational structure of not only the United States but also in countries around the world. If there were no criminal justice system to administer punishment, the world would be unstructured, disorganized, unjustified, cruel, and not to mention a chaotic place for it citizens.

Read More

More about Goals Of Sentencing Essay

Related Topics

Open Document