ipl-logo

God Can Be Rational Without Proof For God's Existence

752 Words4 Pages

In this paper, Plantinga argues that believing in God can be rational without proofs of God’s existence. Natural theology is “the attempt to prove or demonstrate the existence of God” has a long history (49). Some Christians and mostly in the Reformed and Calvinist times rejected natural theology. One question was raised from this view: Why would Christians reject the attempts on proving God’s existence?
There are two Reformed theologians on natural theology, one being John Calvin, and another being Herman Bavinck. On Plantinga's account, Plantinga listed the four beliefs that are highlighted from Bavinck and Calvin. First, Bavinck claimed arguments and proofs are not the source of a Christian’s faith on the existence of God (50). Secondly, …show more content…

Some foundationalists in such like Aquinas, for the belief to be self-evident or “evident to the senses” (56). This means if one observes things around us, we as humans can seek out what is the truth and false. Such example like that was provided: “(1) There is a tree before me; (2) I am wearing shoes; (3) that tree’s leaves are yellow” (56). Others much like Descartes requires the senses to be certain in some ways. From the first three claims, it requires more cautious claims that they should be about mental life. “(4) It seems to me that I see a tree; (5) I seem to see something green or, as Professor Chisholm puts it; (6) I am appeared greenly to” (57). While classical foundationalism demands upon foundational beliefs, it is the opposite for weak foundationalism, thus the demands are weaker. However, Aquinas and Descartes tends to accept weak foundationalism, as they see Reformed thinkers as “rejecting classical foundationalism” (57), but they added certain conditions to become more valid as a basicality.
What remains is the Reformed rejection on one’s belief in God as a properly basic belief. Calvin claims that one does not need arguments to know God’s existence, since one can accept God as basic, whether believe on the basis of other propositions or not. Plantinga concluded that “one who takes belief in God as basic can also know that God exists” (58). Thus, believing

Show More
Related

Summary Of The Warren Flew Debate

757 Words | 4 Pages

The debate was immense for several reasons, one of utmost importance is that it meets the assertion that Christianity can be reasoned logically and rationally. In this debate, Thomas Warren uses the same tools of logic and rationality employed by atheists and agnostics to respond to and defeat Anthony Flew

Read More

Lara Buchak's Can It Be Rational To Have Faith

1347 Words | 6 Pages

In Lara Buchak’s essay, Can It Be Rational to Have Faith? , she asserts that everyday faith statements and religious faith statements share the same attributes. She later states that in order to truly have faith, a person ceases to search for more evidence for their claim, and that having faith can be rational. Although she makes compelling arguments in favor of faith in God, this essay is more hearsay and assumption than actual fact. In this paper, you will see that looking for further evidence would constitute not having faith, but that having faith, at least in the religious sense, is irrational.

Read More

Wager's Argument For The Existence Of God

378 Words | 2 Pages

For this disputation, I had the pleasure of arguing against the topic of be it resolved that you can convince a non-believer to affirm the existence of God using philosophical arguments. As the opposing side, Sarah and I counter argued the following: the argument from motion, the ontological argument, Pascal’s Wager, the cosmological argument, the teleological argument, and the moral argument. The argument from motion argues that it is only possible to experience that which exists, and people experience God, therefore God must exist; however it can be counter argued that since faith cannot be demonstrated or experienced, as it is unseen, God cannot exist.

Read More

Summary Of Divine Hiddenness And Human Reason By J. L Shellenberg

603 Words | 3 Pages

J.L. Schellenberg’s Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason discusses the argument that God does not, in fact, exist. Schellenberg summarizes his beliefs in God’s nonexistence in five key ideas. The main ideas summarized are “If there is a God, he is perfectly loving, If a perfectly loving God exists, reasonable nonbelief does not occur but reasonable nonbelief does occur. Therefore, no perfectly loving God exists. Therefore, there is no God” (Lacy 121).

Read More

Rowe's Argument For The Existence Of God

1372 Words | 6 Pages

Philosopher William Rowe agrees with Plantinga that propositions — that evil exists, God is omnipotent, and God is wholly good — is not logically inconsistent. Rowe does not believe it is impossible to allow God and his properties to exist along with evil. He takes a different route by focusing more on certain kinds of evil which evidently exist in the world, and not so much on the inconsistencies of the theist doctrines. This certain evil, in Rowe’s point of view, will show that a God who is all powerful and wholly good does not exist after all.

Read More

Comparing Descartes 'Excerpts On Skepticism'

3649 Words | 15 Pages

! The Certainty of Reason: An Epistemological comparison between Descartes’ “Meditations 1 & 2” and Pascal’s “Excerpts on Skepticism" Ziryab Ben Brahem (3521 words) ! Prelimintary How do we know that all our beliefs are right?

Read More

Teleological Argument Essay

737 Words | 3 Pages

The existence of God has always been a particularly controversial issue in modern society. Between extremely dedicated believers, atheists or even modern scientists, the concept of God’s existence in the secular world has always been disputed. Despite the quite dated arguments of Saint Thomas Aquinas, Aquinas proved the existence of God during his time through his Five Ways or proofs of God’s existence. The Five Ways or Proofs are logically sound and remains relatively acceptable as reasoning for God’s existence during Aquinas’ time on earth. Of course, the Five Ways is not necessarily flawless and may have been proven wrong in many different ways over the years.

Read More

Thomas Aquinas First Cause Argument Analysis

1797 Words | 8 Pages

In this essay, I will set out to prove that Thomas Aquinas’ First Cause Argument does not show that God exists and the conclusion that God exists does not follow from the premises of the first cause argument. I do think that the conclusion is valid and could be sound/or has the potential to be, but the premises fail to provide the basis upon which to reach such a conclusion. Hence, I will be raising some objections to the premises and will try to disprove any counter-arguments that could be raised in its defense. This would be done by examining Aquinas’ First Cause Argument and trying to disprove it whilst countering arguments in its defense.

Read More

Pascal's Wager Argument Analysis

1127 Words | 5 Pages

From Pascal’s perspective, the only right choice to make is “wager then, without hesitation, that He does exist” (Pascal). Although Pascal argues that believing in God is the most reasonable decision, there are objections against his argument. The “different practices” objection and the “utility of salvation cannot be infinite” objection will be analyzed according to Pascal’s Wager. Utter repetition of religious acts does not give an individual rational justification to believe in God. Pascal starts by mentioning that God's existence or nonexistence cannot be determined with reason; it cannot be proven, but a individual must “convince [himself], not by piling up proofs of God, but by subduing [his] passions” to believe in God (Pascal).

Read More

St. Thomas Aquinas Argument For The Existence Of God

661 Words | 3 Pages

St. Thomas Aquinas is the author of a piece called the The Five Ways which discusses five ways to prove the existence of God. Aquinas’ second way to prove the existence of God is through the concept of efficient causation, the belief of an object that brings a thing into being or initiates a change. In this paper, I will argue that Aquinas’ argument for efficient causation is consistent; however, his belief that there is one first cause, God, is not entirely supported. Aquinas begins his argument by proposing that everything that is known to exist has been caused to exist.

Read More

Soren Kierkegaard's Argument Essay

734 Words | 3 Pages

If by any means man successfully proves in totality the nature of God’s existence, then He will cease to be God. What man is privileged to have are glimpses of God in nature and revelation that begets faith. One

Read More

The Ontological Argument

1689 Words | 7 Pages

I assuredly find in myself the idea of God – of a supremely perfect being – no less than the idea of a figure or a number; and I clearly and distinctly understand that everlasting existence belongs to his nature, no less than I can see what I prove of some figure, or number, belongs to the nature of that figure, or number. So even if my meditations on previous days were not entirely true, yet I ought to hold the existence of God with at least the same degree of certainty as I have so far held mathematical

Read More

Personal Ataraxia Argument Essay

1252 Words | 6 Pages

However, my personal Ataraxia has longed for the answer to God’s existence. The philosophies I will entail within my research paper are; The Pragmatic Theory, Skepticism, existence precedes essence, and the problem with God’s existence. The Pragmatic Theory is conceived by Williams James and to summarize; “A” is true if and only statement “A” is true works. “A” must correspond with our beliefs and correspond

Read More

Arguments Against Agnosticism

423 Words | 2 Pages

in 1889 in two parts. In the first, he states that no human being is obliged to believe in anything that does not have enough evidence, and thus, no man is forced to state whether God exists or not. Nonetheless, in 2006, atheist Richard

Read More

Thomas Aquinas: The Existence Of God

1332 Words | 6 Pages

However as God is not self-evident (ST 1, 2, 1), there ought to be a means to come to understanding God. The Summa Theologiae aims to bring this understanding about by a gradual and systematic approach to doctrine. However, Aquinas is clear that faith is necessary to reinforce even those things that can be grasped by reason alone, therefore to obtain "knowledge of God, free of doubt and uncertainty, it was necessary for Divine matters to be delivered to them by way of faith, being told to them, as it were, by God Himself Who cannot lie" (ST 2/2.2.4). With his deliberate and calculated approach to the Summa Theologiae, it would not be unreasonable to go further and suggest that this perceived leap does itself provide a precise function in his institutional scheme. Dionysius explained that "the most goodly knowing of God is that, the which is known by unknowing" .

Read More

More about God Can Be Rational Without Proof For God's Existence

Related Topics

Open Document