ipl-logo

Thomas Aquinas: The Existence Of God

1332 Words6 Pages

In Summa Theologiae 1a.2.3, Aquinas writes that ‘the existence of God can be proved in five ways’, concluding each of his five arguments with a form of the phrase ‘this everyone understands to be God’. Critically examine the limits and critically assess the legitimacy of Aquinas’ leap from the proofs/ways to the existence of God. This question is loaded with an assertion that Aquinas' arguments conclude with a 'leap' to reach 'God' in each of the five arguments presented. In response to this, we will seek to dissect the intention of the passage in the context of the whole Summa Theologiae. With this in mind, we will demonstrate that while these arguments appear independent of each other, when taken together they convey a sense of what the …show more content…

What does proof mean in this context? The Dominican scholar, Fergus Kerr, notes "the famous 'five ways' of demonstrating God's existence...are not an attempt to refute atheism but an effort of faith seeking understanding of itself" . Velecky, himself a laicized Dominican friar, similarly does not think that these arguments demonstrate God's existence as "none of the five arguments ends with the logical conclusion about God's existence" . Since for Aquinas "God's existence is neither self-evident nor purely a matter of faith" , these proofs concern whether "saying God exists" ('deum esse') is possible - not whether God exists ("dei esse") . Brian Davies illustrates the distinction as the difference between knowing "that there is something stopping the door from opening [and] knowing what it is" . The proof presented by the five ways simply the possibility for humans to speak about God existing. The apparent leap in logic is due to a misunderstood and exaggerated understanding of the five ways purpose. While these arguments end with the phase 'and this everyone calls God', later Aquinas does simply say "and this one is God" (ST 1, 11, 3); this distinction in language chosen supports this distinction between being able to say God exists verses proving that God …show more content…

However as God is not self-evident (ST 1, 2, 1), there ought to be a means to come to understanding God. The Summa Theologiae aims to bring this understanding about by a gradual and systematic approach to doctrine. However, Aquinas is clear that faith is necessary to reinforce even those things that can be grasped by reason alone, therefore to obtain "knowledge of God, free of doubt and uncertainty, it was necessary for Divine matters to be delivered to them by way of faith, being told to them, as it were, by God Himself Who cannot lie" (ST 2/2.2.4). With his deliberate and calculated approach to the Summa Theologiae, it would not be unreasonable to go further and suggest that this perceived leap does itself provide a precise function in his institutional scheme. Dionysius explained that "the most goodly knowing of God is that, the which is known by unknowing" . Aquinas does not aim to exhaust the mysteries of the Divine for "unless there is a sense in which it falls silent before the mystery of God, theology cannot speak of him" . Or, to put it in his own words, "we cannot know what [God] is, but only what He is not" (ST 1.3.

Show More
Related
1033 Words | 5 Pages

As civilizations arose in the Eastern hemisphere, each developed and succeeded due to the sophisticated techniques of imperial administration. Han China, beginning in 206 BCE, rounded out China's basic political and intellectual structure. About 100 years previous, Maurya/ Gupta India made several political contributions despite the diversity that occurred among the regions. The empire's’ different political structures and values along with similar methods of control helped shape the periods of these great civilizations. Before the Han dynasty came into power, the Uins ruled China with Shi Huangdi as the emperor.

Read More
1347 Words | 6 Pages

In Lara Buchak’s essay, Can It Be Rational to Have Faith? , she asserts that everyday faith statements and religious faith statements share the same attributes. She later states that in order to truly have faith, a person ceases to search for more evidence for their claim, and that having faith can be rational. Although she makes compelling arguments in favor of faith in God, this essay is more hearsay and assumption than actual fact. In this paper, you will see that looking for further evidence would constitute not having faith, but that having faith, at least in the religious sense, is irrational.

Read More
513 Words | 3 Pages

He states that Saint Anselm’s argument is impossible for the mind to grasp, and that imaging up anything to perfection can be done on anything, and the example he used was a tropical island. Saint Anselm counter argues back at Gaunilon that there is no perfect definition of what a tropical island could be unlike God. God does have a perfect definition and is not imagined as lacking any perfection. In God’s perfection he must exist in reality and not just in the mind in order to be the most perfect of all. This topic is a bit over my head for the fact that I never though this complex before about God.

Read More
1656 Words | 7 Pages

He then says that without his knowledge of God's existence, none of his knowledge could be so clear and distinct. It is easy for one to be puzzled by how poorly this resolution was articulated; how is that Descartes' proof of the reliability of clear and distinct perceptions is because of the existence of a [non-deceiving] God, yet his proof of God’s existence [as a non-deceiver] is because of the reliability of his clear and distinct perceptions? This apparent circular reasoning, formally known as the Cartesian Circle, makes his argument appear weak and void. Both parts of the Cartesian circle make sense, but not together. It would have strengthened Descartes’ argument to better phrase this part of the

Read More
511 Words | 3 Pages

The paradox of the stone heavily relies on Thomas Aquinas’s understanding of gods omnipotence. Aquinas proposes that Omnipotence is the power to do everything that is possible, not just to do anything. Aquinas breaks it down into two forms of possibilities; Relative possibility and Absolute possibility that will be discussed first in order to understand the paradox of the stone argument. Relative possibility is a power that lies within some beings, but not within others.

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

In Saint Thomas Aquinas argument the second way, Aquinas argues for the existence of God, making use of efficient causes and premises to help us conclude that God exists. In the following words I would argue that Saint Thomas Aquinas’s argument formulated in the second way leads to a valid argument, which concludes that there must be a first cause and that God exists. Aquinas second way is an argument that God is the first cause and he is essential to everything on earth because nothing would have the power to fuel its self without the intermediate cause which is God. An example is a painter using a paintbrush to paint as he moves his hand, paint is applied on the wall but if he stops, the paint would not fly from the brush to the wall, stopping

Read More
1793 Words | 8 Pages

It all depends on how you interpret the premises, which is something Aquinas should’ve stated more clearly so anyone who reads his argument knows exactly what he’s trying to

Read More
1628 Words | 7 Pages

(Anon., 2004) Anselm’s argument is a reductio argument, it seeks to demonstrate that a statement is true by showing that an absurd result would follow from its denial. I will be discussing three objections to Anselm’s argument which I will reply to, namely: “the perfect island” objection by Gaunilo; “existence is not a predicate” objection by Immanuel Kant and Aquinas objection “not everyone has the same concept of God”. I agree that that Anselm’s ontological argument does indeed show that God exists.

Read More
924 Words | 4 Pages

Anselm delivered the first known ontological argument in a prayer. He claimed, 1) God exists in the understanding, 2) good might have existed in reality, 3) if something exists only in the understanding, then it is possible for it to be greater, 4) suppose God exists only in the understanding, 5) God might have been greater than it is, and 6) the greatest possible being could have been greater. There is a contradiction between #4 and #6. Guanilo counters Anselm’s argument by demonstrating that one could substitute different words with God and make absurd claims. For instance, he substitutes God for

Read More
422 Words | 2 Pages

The cosmological argument consists of several arguments that start with the fact that the universe exists and, using inductive reasoning, works down to a conclusion as to how and why the universe exists. The cosmological argument is a posteriori so it uses empirical evidence from the known world to support its conclusion. The kalam cosmological argument, which has its roots in Islam and was revived by contemporary philosopher William Lane Craig, and the first three of St Thomas Aquinas’ five ways are arguments that attempt to prove the existence of God by inferring ‘facts’ concerning causation, motion, contingency and Aquinas’ first way is known as the ‘unmoved mover’, Aquinas observed that everything in the universe is in motion (in the state

Read More
315 Words | 2 Pages

No doubt the preceding notion was unwelcome to both Catholics and Protestants. For Catholics the source of knowledge is the divine revelation rather than human endeavor. Although the "five ways" of proving the existence of God proposed by St. Thomas Aquinas are rational approaches, all five arguments are based on divine manifestation. Under Anselm 's premise that faith precedes reason, knowledge is a supernatural gift of grace and truth is all that God has revealed because he has revealed it.

Read More
1356 Words | 6 Pages

Be that as it may, the scholar can, in the event that he wishes, acknowledge this feedback. He can concede that no discerning confirmation of God 's presence is conceivable. Also, he can in any case hold all that is key to his position, by holding that God 's presence is known in some other, non-judicious way. I think, notwithstanding, that an all the more telling feedback can be made by method for the convention issue of shrewdness. Here it can be appeared, not that religious convictions need discerning backing, but rather that they are emphatically unreasonable, that the few sections of the crucial philosophical convention are conflicting with each other, so that the scholar can keep up his position in general just by a significantly more amazing dismissal of reason than in the previous case.

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

Then we look at the second argument of Aquinas, The Argument of Causation- everything that is caused has to be caused by something else, there cannot be an infinite number of causes, and same as argument number one that must mean there is a God since all effects have causes. The Argument from Contingency asks if everything already exists contingently has a reason to do so, does the universe exists for a reason and if the universe has a reason for its existence that that reason must be God. The Aquinas fourth argument the Argument from Degrees Aquinas says in order to compare two things in the terms of good or bad, we must have something to compare it to, this would have to be an absolutely perfect thing aka God. Aquinas’ fifth and final argument is The Teleological Argument-

Read More
1178 Words | 5 Pages

PAPER #2 History of philosophy: Philosophy 20B Thomas Aquinas reasons that “God is one” in the Summa theologiae, part one, question eleven, article three. Using three proofs, one on “Gods simplicity,” the second on “the infinity of Gods perfection” and the last based on “the unity of the world.” The following will be Dissecting and providing explanations along with criticism. As well, what it is meant by “God is one”.

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

Thomas Aquinas was greatly influenced by Aristotle and it clearly reflected through his works. Aquinas adopted Aristotle’s theories of place, motion, and time making them his primary source of inspiration to his own philosophical thoughts. Aristotle wasn’t the only inspiration in St. Thomas Aquinas but he was the most important one related to God and living. He believed that God and the natural world were connected, and that Aristotle’s thought that all living things had soul, including plants and animals were true. Because of his idea of the existence of God which was influenced by Aristotle, and the ways of living the Church wouldn’t approve his work, the archbishop of Paris declared his thoughts as profanation.

Read More

More about Thomas Aquinas: The Existence Of God

Open Document