The existence of God has always been a particularly controversial issue in modern society. Between extremely dedicated believers, atheists or even modern scientists, the concept of God’s existence in the secular world has always been disputed. Despite the quite dated arguments of Saint Thomas Aquinas, Aquinas proved the existence of God during his time through his Five Ways or proofs of God’s existence. The Five Ways or Proofs are logically sound and remains relatively acceptable as reasoning for God’s existence during Aquinas’ time on earth. Of course, the Five Ways is not necessarily flawless and may have been proven wrong in many different ways over the years. In respect to Aquinas’ time and the resources he had to prove the existence of God, Aquinas effectively does so through his Five Ways proof. In the first proof, the Argument based on Motion, Aquinas relates God to be the very first cause of any motion of this world. Aquinas does not relate God to being the direct cause of historic events; instead he offers the reasoning that motion is finite, and God is the first cause to set the existence of the world in motion. Logically and in terms of physics, Aquinas provides a perfectly logical reason to at least having an initial cause of Creation, if …show more content…
God acts with purpose, as can be seen in the book of gensis and the Creation stories. Outside of Aquinas’ Five Ways to prove God’s existence, the most key arguments that Aquinas puts forth are due to the analogical way humans speak about God. The univocal and equivocal nature in which humans use theological language to describe God Himself is an essential component to understanding God’s existence. Neither univocal nor equivocal descriptions can truly encompass the analogous relationship humans have with