In 2012, Suzanne Desrochers published the book Bride of New France. This work tells the story of Laure Beauséjour who is taken from her family and placed in the Salpêtrière, an institution known for housing prostitutes, mentally disabled and the poor in Paris, France. The main character imagines becoming a seamstress and marrying a wealthy man making a better life for herself but her dream soon comes to an end. Laure is sent to New France as a “fille du roi” and expected to marry one of the many men living in Ville-Marie. It is the intent of this essay to discuss and asses Desrochers’ portrayal of Ville-Marie in New France in 1669.
Alex, I really liked your post. A few great points I want to hit on before diving into your questions. For one, the perpetuation of the noble savage is clear and paired with the idea of accepted culture of conquest really reminds me of the US ideal "manifest destiny". One line in the De Las Casas readings discusses who the indigenous peoples "must have known what was going on" when their culture was destroyed during conquest. This idea that they had a clue about the damage that was ensuing paints these people as complacent beings - when really they were skilled warriors, great farmers who lacked competitive firearms.
“So we may well call these people barbarians, in respect to the rules of reason, but not in respect to ourselves, who surpass them in every kind of barbarity” (Montaigne 156). Here Montaigne directly addresses the idea that Europeans are more savage and “barbaric” in many ways than the natives are. In this instance, once again while critiquing European society, he employs barbaric in a negative way. Montaigne argues that although Europeans may call the natives “barbaric” and mean this in a derogatory way however in reality, he inherently suggests the indigenous peoples should only be called barbaric if they are being described as
Through the use of bitter irony, sarcasm, exaggeration, blunt jokes, and blatant criticism, Voltaire sheds light on European civilization in the 18th century. He reveals the hypocrisy of the people and their institutions of the time by effectively using humor as his tool to compose this widely known satirical piece. His tone throughout his work also suggests as to what he would deem appalling in modern society and what the most likely subjects of his satirical criticism would be. Voltaire satirizes the different philosophies that people lived by throughout the novel. Every new character introduced exerted a particular definition as to how life should be perceived and lived.
Personal Freedom vs Intellectual Holocaust In Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, Montag’s desire for personal freedom constantly conflicts with the ongoing intellectual holocaust. During this era, society discourages the opportunity to think independently because they live under the impression that “not everyone [is] born free and equal, as the constitution says, but made equal” (Bradbury 146) Many technological advancements evolve to occupy everyone and society enforces many rules to ensure that everyone lives equally. However, Montag meets Clarisse, who exposes him to her extroverted lifestyle and encouraged him to question his lifestyle.
“I'll go to Saragossa, to Marsilla: / but first I'll have a little bit of fun/ in order to assuage my wrath.” (Pg. 61, line 299-301).
Transcendentalists believed that every person was inheritably good and that we could form a paradise based off these new principles of Transcendentalism. Many people, however, disagreed with transcendentalism including Poe. History has shown that we have retained most of our primitive behavior, making a utopia near impossible. Poe’s work shows how gruesome we “civilized” people can really be. One example would be the “Cask of Amontillado.”
When he is forced to leave this life behind him, one follows Candide’s slow, painful disillusionment as he experiences and witnesses the great injustices and hardships of the world. This text is a satire in which Voltaire satirises Leibniz’s Optimism “not only by the illogical travesty of it which Pangloss parrots throughout the story, but also by juxtaposing it with various atrocities and disasters which the story provides…” (Pearson xx). Voltaire rejects this system of thought, as Enlightenment ideologies try to use “logic and reason [to] somehow explain away the chaotic wretchedness of existence by grandly ignoring the facts” (Pearson xxi). It is in these lines that one can discern the disillusionment that Voltaire was feeling with the world after the 1755 Lisbon Earthquake (Pearson xix).
This is a fatal event in Rousseau’s mind as unlike ‘the savage’ who ‘lives in himself’, an individual in society ‘is always outside himself and knows how to live only in the opinion of others’. Very unlike the Hobbesian war-like state of nature where ‘vainglory’ cause people to act like barbarous beasts, Rousseau argues that egocentrism derives solely from social interaction believing that his predecessors were projecting ideas of modern corruption onto the state of nature. Therefore, Rousseau’s analysis of moral psychology reveals how humans have become duplicitous and false through socialisation as the foundations of competition and bettering people are laid and consequently, a ‘desire for inequality’ governs the
What does it mean to be an American? Without any doubts, throughout centuries, since the foundation of this country, people have asked themselves what it means to be an American. As of today, it is a known fact that immigrants have helped with the development of this nation and discrepancies of what it means to be an American were born throughout the years. Certainly, more than one person has tried to give an exact answer to this question.
At Calamity Morning.’ ‘Calamity morning! No! He can’t do that!’” (Abouet 73)
In Dan Dennett’s “Where Am I?” , the philosopher uses a fictional story of his brain being separated from his body in order to retrieve a radioactive warhead underground. The radiation would be harmful to his brain, but not his body; so his brain sits in a vat in Houston while it controls his body by a radio antenna underground in Tulsa. In the story, Dennett poses three philosophical questions: Can you identify “you” as your brain? Is the soul immaterial?
Alphonse de Lamartine, French writer and politician, once said, “Music is the literature of the heart; it commences where speech ends” (“Quotes About Power Of Music”). What is one of your favorite songs? Does this song have any special meaning for you? Music can be motivational, relaxing, exciting, or even frightening. Sometimes choosing a specific song as your favorite can be challenging, but there is usually one that you really like because the lyrics are relatable to you, maybe it describes your mood, or it may just be really catchy.
Dilapidated has a negative denotation that means to be “decayed, deteriorate, or fallen into partial ruin especially through neglect or misuse.” In the passage, dilapidated has a negative connotation that is used to characterize the way creole was used. Usually infrastructure as describe as in a dilapidated state, but Chamousieu characterizes a language to suggest the inferiority with which the creole is looked at in public institutions. Creole “circulated easy,” but its “dilapidated state” refers to the misuse of Creole to say “insults, dirty words, hatreds, violence, and tales of catastrophe.” Previously, Creole was seen as the primary means of communicated, but now, for society as well as the children, this dialect is used for only to spew
This chapter in the history of mankind is so appalling and so shameful to us Europeans that I would rather not say anything more about it”. This just shows that Gombrich was being very selfish to the Americans, and he did not want to talk about the topic just because it created a bad visual on the Europeans. In my opinion, Gombrich should still talk about the shameful things which Europeans have done, not only the good things. If this type of sanitized, biased and Eurocentric view on history would be all we knew about the past, then this world would be in terrible state