Good Policy Memo

differ. In the message to public officials on food safety, they conduct an appropriate genre for the reader. " Now let us consider the desire folks in government that have to devise a legislative solution for the problems of food safety" (Smith, 2016, p. 52). This statement directly identifies that they are addressing government officials about the problems of food safety. In addition, other potential readers could include, writers of the state level of organization. "If we can really get this right, a visionary and "fresh" approach concerning food safety at local, state, and federal levels of government might lead to an agriculture renaissance in this country…" (Smith, 2015, p. 54). They chose a genre appropriate for various audiences. It

As this message to public has a inclusiveness problem definition, it influences actors who disagree to work together. "The following three tiered structure seems to be the current reality in food production and marketing systems, and a necessary framework for any successful effort to further regulate food safety and security" (Smith, 2015, p. 52). The author uses a logical tone, and a positive attitude that explains all actors involved should work together to form a solution. Furthermore, using appropriate tone allows for a consideration of alternatives. "The most basic strategies for achieving a safe food supply, therefore, are not only to keep the distribution patterns as local and/or regional as possible, but also to put the famers faces back on the food" (Smith, 2015, p. 52). The direct tone, gives a solution to the problem of food safety. Furthermore, the policy brief tone frames the problem. "NAC's work has resulted in federal programs that promote small and mid-sized family farms, increase new farming and ranching opportunities, invest in sustainable and organic research, reward conservation excellence and expand local and regional food systems" (Smith, 2016, p. 56). This sentence justifies the frame by establishing authority, and it keeps an assertive

First, in the policy brief the author introduces a problem description. "Over the last several years, the rise in major outbreaks of foodborne illnesses ha called into question the sufficiency of the U.S. food safety system" (Smith, 2016, p. 56). The author establishes knowledge of the topic and problem and gives a basic background for the reader. Next, perspective is established when mentioning the authors viewpoint. "Several food safety bills have been introduced into the 111th Congress that could directly or indirectly affect farms and ranches by expanding these authorities and making some on farm safety standards mandatory" (Smith, 2016, p. 56). This perspective directly discusses a problem with government enacting a bill that could potentially harm farmers and ranches. Next, the author provides their position in the final paragraph,. "It is our position, however, that proposals proffering one-size-fits all solution to food safety fail to acknowledge the diversity of agriculture and are inappropriate and counterproductive course of action" (Smith, 2016, p. 57). The author clearly defines his viewpoint for the reader that long term solutions are better than short term, however it is stated in the last paragraph after the recommendations. Next, the bulleted list includes content relevant to the context. "FDA coordinates with other state and federal agencies and