ipl-logo

Government Surveillance Vs. Privacy

1887 Words8 Pages

Government Surveillance VS Privacy.
Spying is nothing short than the normal. If you pay attention to history, you will notice that even in ancient civilizations like the Roman Empire, Egypt, China and India have all used it. 1900s regimes like former Soviet Union and Nazi Germany used spying tactics around world wars. The main use of spying was mostly for political and military advantage. These countries were very successful on spying.
However, in the 21st century surveillance is used in many different and complex ways. So many crimes and terrorist attacks forced governments around the world to use electronic surveillance to protect their own people. This electronic surveillance so complicated that you won’t even know it is happening and you …show more content…

One of the NSA document says”Collect it all. Sniff it all. Know it all. Process it all. Exploit it all (Monk Debate on State Surveillance).” This is just bad. They are doing everything they want. They are clearly trying to know everything about us. Another very disturbing thing about NSA was that it was spying “communications of the Brazilian oil giant Petro bras… elected leaders of allied states,” and German chancellor Angela Merkel (Greenwald 202). What? The US government clearly says that it is using surveillance to prevent terrorist attacks, however somehow it surveys a leader of a country that is friendly to us. From this you can understand that the US government is using surveillance for more than just security. I think like 1900s regimes the US government is using surveillance to get advantage on something other than security over other …show more content…

In that case, they will also say yes for surveillance. This is easy to understand because there is no privacy without security. However, documents leaked over and over again show us that surveilling is ineffective and there are very little evidence of surveillance helping us from preventing crimes and tragedies (Landau, Greenwald, Munk Debate on State Surveillance). Sadly, because of that the government started to use for other things. From surveilling a country leader to surveilling a single person’s private life. Right now, people are doing things in fear that government is watching them. Their brain is controlled. Right now, people are becoming hesitant to do things especially on internet. This is because they think that somebody is watching what they doing. In this case, surveillance is preventing us from doing what we want to do. For this reason, no solution is found. Some people continued asking the government to stop it. However, the government is trying to persuade them by saying that it is using to protect them. Right now, there is no solution, but people are debating about it. Which is good. Which side are you? Privacy or

Show More
Related
422 Words | 2 Pages

NSA SPYING PROGRAMMES The United States of America has been ranked the best country with a strong security and defense capability and currently still holds the position. Over the years from independence, the U.S.A continue to increase in strengthen and power to self-defend and ability to intercept major issues around the world. From the World War II and other subsequence wars that followed, the whole world can testify to the superiority of the American Military and their efficiency in the field. This doesn’t just stop there; USA spends almost 20% of their budget on the defense and security of the nation.

Read More
1170 Words | 5 Pages

Big Brother spying on its citizens demonstrates how large governments utilize constant surveillance to ensure their

Read More
1180 Words | 5 Pages

It gives us a broad view of how devious our government can be towards their private situations. One of the main consequences that government faces as a result of their secrets is the distrust they receive from America today. Our government can asks us to participate in their desire to know more of us but refuses to inform us with the truth. Instead of giving up our rights to our government we should be protecting them. Therefore, it is absurd that there is even a debate on whether or not we should allow our government to monitor our personal

Read More
565 Words | 3 Pages

This PowerPoint is used to explain the two sides of this debatable topic, but putting more focus on one of them. Personally, I think that surveillance can be beneficial to the country, and this can be addressed in three ways: ethos, logos, and pathos. Ethos is believing in the claim because there is a person of power, or a recognized face advertising it. I used George Bush in this

Read More
1418 Words | 6 Pages

Although the monitoring of suspected terrorists was the original intention, the power hungry intelligence agencies of

Read More
1109 Words | 5 Pages

The NSA is mandated to focus on the external threats. The NSA and other intelligence agencies are also controlled by law; law created by the FISA court created by the Foreign Surveillance Act of 1978 which dictates what is legal and illegal; for intelligence agencies to do. The most important activity the NSA has done to help the citizens is through the collection of metadata, this has enabled the agency to collect information on whom one is communicating with, the text messages that are sent and received and where one is located and what he is doing at that particular time. In the Cities, domestic surveillance is used to trap those who are speeding and red light runners through the use of automated cameras. It is evident that the police are using cameras with face recognition technology in Washington to monitor Federal buildings, street subway and other locations in the town.

Read More
1277 Words | 6 Pages

The U.S follows a different school of surveillance. Despite the fundamental right to be held “innocent until proven guilty”, it monitors everyone until proven innocent. The status quo could of course damage America’s long known liberties granted by the Constitution. Recent revelations by whistleblower Edward Snowden, have confirmed that the government is more likely to cross some constitutional lines in the name of national security. “The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) regulates the government’s acquisition of any electronic surveillance within the country for foreign intelligence use.

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

Imagine for a second that every phone call you make, every text message you send, and every place you go is being constantly monitored by multiple governments. Well this is basically what the United State and United Kingdom's government is doing on a daily basis. The United States National Security Agency has been implementing projects in secret to monitoring people since 2001 but it would still be kept as a secret if Edward Snowden did not reveal this massive secret that was intruding the public’s privacy for years. The U.S. surveillance program started because of the September 9th, 2001 terrorist attack that hijacked airplanes and slammed them into the World Trade Center towers.

Read More
798 Words | 4 Pages

You shouldn’t have to be watched if you aren’t deemed a threat to yourself or society. In my opinion humans are naturally more private creatures that don’t like sharing everything about themselves. The individual right of privacy allows humans to hide somethings about themselves, if it doesn’t seem harmful. However, surveillance is used in public order to observe those that could be plotting against the government, or an attack in the United States. Surveillance has been used to catch and stop many dangerous people who show a threat to the safety of the United States.

Read More
667 Words | 3 Pages

According to the text “Our value is founded on a unique and deep understanding of risks, vulnerabilities, mitigations, and threats. Domestic Surveillance plays a vital role in our national security by using advanced data mining systems to "connect the dots" to identify suspicious patterns” (NSA). One of the slogans of the NSA is, “if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear. However, if you have nothing to hide there is no argumentation as to why the NSA taps into any form of communication or access to the internet. Therefore, this withdraws the power of the people and puts it directly back into the government and, simultaneously belittles citizen’s

Read More
794 Words | 4 Pages

Opinion Article #1 Maximilen Robespierre was one of the most practical and capable leaders I witnessed aiding to the revolution. Because he witnessed the unruly hand of King Louis XVI from my point of view as a lowly 3rd estate citizen with no power and hope, he uncovered the flaws of a monarchy system. To overcome nobility Robespierre, myself, and other members of the lower social classes joined groups and cults to end the reign against the French king. In 1792, King Louis XVI was finally executed and stripped of his title. Monarchy had come to an end in France with the death of the king, however Robespierre still noticed many rebellions despite the history of King Louis XVI’s rule.

Read More
1390 Words | 6 Pages

Surveillance is becoming increasingly integrated into human lives. Seemingly inconsequential minutiae like how long one spends in line at a grocery store or how many times a headline is clicked on a social media site are collected automatically by both public and private institutions. Whatever we do and wherever we go, there is likely some trace of it. This has led to great debates about the right to privacy, how much surveillance is too much, and under what circumstances surveillance is justifiable. Film and Television play important roles in these debates and in the way in which the public conceptualizes the utility and threat of surveillance more generally.

Read More
870 Words | 4 Pages

Since its initiation, we only know about one instance in which the NSA stopped has stopped an act of terrorism. That’s not to say that it has only stopped one terrorist organization but this is the only on we know about, but for the amount of money (exact amount is classified, but is estimated to be about $10 billion a year) that is being spent on the NSA more should have been done by now. For example, many school shooters have posted on social media either pictures of themselves armed to the teeth or actual threats against their school. The NSA is supposed to monitor social media, phone records, etc. so why aren’t they catching these school shooters?

Read More
1315 Words | 6 Pages

(Bilton, 2013) Surveillance of search engines permits information to be monitored so that if any hazardous search word like how to make bomb is looked it up several times by someone then it can be identified (Anon, 2014). Also, watching over the public assists police to capture crime suspects so that government organizations can protect national security (mass surveillance 위키피디아) To be specific, after terrible incident occurred in September 11, 2001, government of United States enacted the Patriot Act which stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001. The act was signed by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001 in the name of declaring war with terrorism. (위키피디아) The law grants the right to Federal Bureau of Investigation to profile people who fit certain stereotypes so that potential crime and potential terror can be prevented.

Read More
798 Words | 4 Pages

Many advocate government supervision because they believe that it will ensure National Security. Others strongly oppose this preferring to have personal privacy. Espionage has been beneficial in the past and has potential to be helpful in the future but when misused, it becomes more of a hazard. The freedom of speech also should not be sacrificed in the name of National Security. In addition, there should be limit on the kind of information the government receives and the manner in which it receives it.

Read More

More about Government Surveillance Vs. Privacy

Related Topics

Open Document