ipl-logo

Robespierre's Rebellion

794 Words4 Pages

Opinion Article #1 Maximilen Robespierre was one of the most practical and capable leaders I witnessed aiding to the revolution. Because he witnessed the unruly hand of King Louis XVI from my point of view as a lowly 3rd estate citizen with no power and hope, he uncovered the flaws of a monarchy system. To overcome nobility Robespierre, myself, and other members of the lower social classes joined groups and cults to end the reign against the French king. In 1792, King Louis XVI was finally executed and stripped of his title. Monarchy had come to an end in France with the death of the king, however Robespierre still noticed many rebellions despite the history of King Louis XVI’s rule. Robespierre took control of France soon after and made precautions to ensure the rights and freedom of the citizens. He knew the risks of being lenient to the people would lead to tyranny and inequality. As a supporter of the …show more content…

He made it his job to get rid of everything indicating nobility to prevent the past from resurfacing. He had people like me change our names and toss out Christian symbols, but that is a small sacrifice for the rights of people. In addition to reinforce the shift of power, he destroyed churches and restructured the Christian calendar. Anyone caught with any signs or words of disagreement could have been executed, because France can’t afford to take any more chances with the system. Due to his strict ruling, his rule was known as the “The Reign of Terror”, because of the numerous deaths of betrayers. The public did not understand the sacrifices Robespierre has to take to eliminate the reign of the king and queen. The public could only understand and concentrate on the fact that their loved ones were being condemned and the number of people executed everyday. They will soon understand to look at the big picture and realize everything done is for the better of the

Show More
Related
174 Words | 1 Pages

Maximilien Robespierre was executed on July 28, 1794. Robespierre has appeared to be inebriated with the control over life and demise. Numerous individuals in the Revolutionary government scrutinized Robespierre 's thought processes as the nation was not under risk by any outsiders. On July 27, 1794, Robespierre and a large portion of his associates were captured and taken to jail. He found himself able to escape with the guide of a thoughtful prison guard and covered up in the City Hall in Paris.

Read More
773 Words | 4 Pages

Later in time, Maximilian Robspere came to power and started the reign of terror. Under his leadership and his Committee of Public Safety, tens of thousands deemed enemies of the revolution lost their lives on the guillotine. Shortly after, Robespierre himself was arrested and guillotined, accused of leading France into tyranny and dictatorship. The French Revolution was inspired by the right to change a non beneficial leader and resist

Read More
474 Words | 2 Pages

The Reign of Terror in France was not justified. This claim can be supported by looking at three areas: external threat, the internal threat, and the methods. The external threat was not enough to justify the Reign of Terror. One example of this is that “churches are soon closed by revolutionary government” which is wrong, because people should be able to choose what they believe in (Document A). Another example is that the “Government denies legal counsel to accused enemies of the revolution” (Document A).

Read More
1142 Words | 5 Pages

From the beginning, Robespierre followed the ideology of Jean-Jacques Rousseau (Andress 105). It was not uncommon for political leaders of the Revolution to follow the philosophies of the Enlightenment thinkers; therefore, his political notions were not so far-flung and radical for the time. Robespierre worked alongside the republic’s government and used this opportunity to influence decisions made regarding the public. He would speak of his need for the extreme measures that took as well as voice the fears of his people, including starvation, death, and the degradation of the nation (Andress 103). The government was also known to be violent from time to time, which influenced the ruler to use terrorism as a means of gaining power (Andress 105).

Read More
626 Words | 3 Pages

How do you know is if someone is a hero or a tyrant? A tyrant is a single ruler who abuses his power. A hero is a person who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities. During the French, Mexican, and Haitian revolution there were a lot of tyrannical actions, but there were also a lot of heroic actions to challenge the existing social, political and economic system.

Read More
914 Words | 4 Pages

Robespierre was influenced greatly by the teachings of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, which inspired Robespierre’s belief and morals and became the main reason why he fought for equal rights for men and demand for justice and change from the French monarchy. Robespierre was not fond of the French monarchy and believed that they were abusing their power so he used his platform to advocate for change. “Robespierre and his youthful colleague, Saint-Just (1767-94)-also once an opponent of the death penalty led the way in claiming that ‘Louis must die in order for the Revolution to live,” (Robespierre and The Terror). Robespierre’s begin to call for more purges and execution, causing the people and other government officials to question Robespierre’s motives. They began to fear for their lives and in fear of another revolutionary, they decided to overthrow Robespierre and execute

Read More
1059 Words | 5 Pages

How revolutionary was the French Revolution? Did the Revolution simply replace the old ruling elite with a new bourgeois one? What were the major effects on different groups of people, including nobles, priests, peasants, urban workers, slaves, and women? This essay will address the French Revolution and the degree to which it can be aptly described as “revolutionary.” How revolutionary was the French Revolution? Was the storming of the Bastille, the destruction of feudalism, and the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen of a fundamental and radical and revolutionary nature, or, alternatively, simply a series of historical events that results in the supplanting of one authoritarian regime for another and at great cost in

Read More
1491 Words | 6 Pages

With all of this fear, how could Maximilien Robespierre possibly have a downfall? As the last two months of the terror came, the tyrant started to blame himself for the thousands of deaths. He passed the Law of the Twenty Second Prairial, which stated that all rights of the accused victim were washed away, making the executions go even faster (Linton). After the Committee of Public Safety passed this, Robespierre never attended another meeting. In his last few weeks, he rarely left his assigned room.

Read More
221 Words | 1 Pages

He tells us that is trying to form a “Republic of Virtue” when in reality he is just eliminating a lot of France 's significant history. Even keeping the days straight now is hard, after he changed our days and weeks up. And to think this was being done because it was a threat to the republic. Not to mention all of the unwarranted killing for his precious “Republic of Virtue”. You don 't have to do much

Read More
682 Words | 3 Pages

Maximilien de Robespierre wrote the speech On the Revolutionary Government in order to rally the French citizens to support the revolution to save it from enemies within the government itself and because he believed that the revolutionary government has to act in a way the constitutional government can’t for multiple reasons. First, Robespierre wrote On the Revolutionary Government to call together the people of France in order to validate the need for violence in the revolution so that they could preserve their government from the enemies within, (Spielvogel, 582), “ …The National Convention, under the direction of the Committee of Public Safety, instituted the Reign of Terror to preserve the Revolution from its internal enemies.” He also believed that violence and executions were the only way to protect the their government from countries such as Austria, England, Russia, Italy, and Prussia who would question their authority and send their agents into the French government in order to undermine them and send them back into tyranny by reinstating the monarchy. Secondly, Robespierre was also one of the leading members of the Committee and they believed that any person or country not within the Republic, is an enemy and that it is up to the Committee that they kill their enemies, (Spielvogel, 581),”Louis Saint-Just, one of the younger members of the Committee of Public Safety, explained their

Read More
261 Words | 2 Pages

Throughout the 16th century there was much turmoil throughout the secular world in Europe. This was primarily because of the Martin Luther and his rebellious cause against the Catholic Church that would result in the reformation. Out of the reformation comes many new advances throughout society, no some more than the field of thought. This time period made people think deeply about not just their connection between God and themselves, but about the effects of every action a person takes in respect to God. Interestingly, because of this period of deep pious reflection, there are many actions that were previously seen as sinful that can not be attempted.

Read More
355 Words | 2 Pages

During the French Revolution, beginning in 1789, was the turning point of politics and the support of the French Revolution. Although the French Revolution had numerous outstanding leaders, there are two that stands out to me the most. Those two people was Maximilien Robespierre and Jacques-Pierre Brissot. Maximilien Robespierre and Jacques-Pierre Brissot are both political leader who had a great influenced on the Revolution, but they both had similarities and differences of their politics and their means by which they supported the Revolution.

Read More
1350 Words | 6 Pages

King Louis XVI, who was the ruler at the time, was a main contributor to these problems that led France to its downfall. The country had a massive lack of resources and food, which led King Louis XVI to borrow more money than he could afford, thus putting the country in immense debt. Despite the very visible crisis overthrowing the country, the king was incapable of accepting his mistakes and refused to change his ways. He maintained the unjust voting system, known as the Estates-General, and worsened the taxing system in order to pay off his debts. The people, especially those of the Third Estate, were clearly angry and dissatisfied with the state of the country, which led them seek out a movement for what was right.

Read More
1911 Words | 8 Pages

This enormous massacre of people went against Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity, all of which the national assembly declared were every man 's right. Much of the killing can be blamed on Robespierre and King Louis XVI. Although it was mostly a failure, some achievements can be seen through the Revolution. The French Revolution helped the French people become a more equal and socialist state. This showed Europe that the French were capable of revolting and they were not afraid to stand up for what they believed.

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

The French Revolution was undoubtedly influenced by the political theorists of the Enlightenment. The ideas of two French political theorists in particular are easily seen throughout the French Revolution, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Baron Montesquieu. Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s thoughts and texts, such as the Social Contract, instilled the entitlement of basic human rights to all men. Rousseau’s concepts on rights combined with Baron Montesquieu’s ideas on government provided the backbone of a radical movement in the French Revolution known as the Terror. When one delves into the beginnings of the French Revolution, the motives and actions of the National Assembly, and the Terror of the French Revolution, one can obviously see the influence of two Enlightenment political theorists, Rousseau and Montesquieu.

Read More

More about Robespierre's Rebellion

Related Topics

Open Document