ipl-logo

Greg Ousley Case

632 Words3 Pages

On June 25, 2012, the Supreme court ruled that juveniles who committed murder could not be sentenced for to life in prison. Their reasoning was that it violated the 8th Amendment, that stated the ban of cruel and unusual punishment. However, that is not the only reason to have juveniles not be sentenced for life. I agree with the supreme court’s decision because juveniles who commit crime can be coming from an unhealthy background, their brain is not fully developed, and their characters are still in formation. Greg Ousley murdered his parents on February 27, 1993 with a rifle gun that he was found in his house. Scott Anderson wrote a story about Ousley about how his mother cheated on his father and Greg witnessed it and that his father had little to no communication with him. Being in an environment like that makes adolescents and children in general act out towards their parents or the people around them (Greg Ousley Is Sorry for Killing His Parents. Is That Enough?, Anderson). Although, his mother was loving towards him, she was also always on his case about everything and constantly ridiculed him for …show more content…

A Juvenile writes, “brain imaging studies reveal that the regions of the adolescent brain responsible for controlling thoughts, actions and emotions are not fully developed” ( Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences, Garinger 5). Grainger is not wrong that is the reason why so many adolescents are risk takers and make impulse decisions because they do not think of the repercussions of their actions. There are age limits to drinking and voting because the people who made those laws believed that adolescents could not handle those acts at their age for their immaturity. Lawmakers would look like hypocrites if they said that adolescents do not have a fully developed mind for drinking and voting, but do for making a decision of killing

Open Document