ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Jones Vs State Of Mississippi

383 Words2 Pages

A comparison study of two murders in the state of Ms which are Jones v. State of Mississippi (2009) and Parker v. State of Mississippi (2011) and both of these cases have a lot in common. Brett Jones and Lester Parker are currently in jail for a heinous crime. Not only were they 15 years old juveniles doing the time but they both their grandfathers several times for different reasons and because of that they were charged with first and second degree murder and was sentenced to life without parole.

Brett Jones Jr. v. State of Mississippi (2009)
Brett Jones stabbed his 68 year old grandfather to death and was sentenced to life without parole but because he was a juvenile at the time he was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole because his 8th amendment was violated. He supposedly killed his grandfather because he didn't approve of his runaway girlfriend and it made him extremely angry. When he became an adult he had another trial and was sentenced to life without parole.( Findlaw, 2016)

Parker v. State of Mississippi (2011) …show more content…

At first he claimed self defense but he tried to cover up the murder to make it seem as an accident , getting rid of evidence like a bloody t-shirt. His neighbors father testified that he saw lester with a knife and a bloody t- shirt on. Soon after lester Parker was arrested. He was charged with first degree murder but because he was a juvenile at the time he was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole like in the case Jones v State of Mississippi (2009) and was resentenced to life without parole when he turned 18. (Findlaw,

Show More
Related
712 Words | 3 Pages

His father worked as a farmer. Kenneth was indulged by his family, which was respectable though somewhat odd, and he got the reputation of being a bully who was careful to pick only on the weak. He was suspected of fourteen murders. He had been on death row from 1968 to 1972. Kenneth was executed in Texas Tuesday night.

Read More
856 Words | 4 Pages

Facts of the Case/Question: A jury found Gregg guilty of armed robbery and murder, then sentenced him to death. During appeal, the Georgia Supreme Court confirmed the death sentence, except it could not be used because of the robbery. Gregg challenged his death sentence for murder by claiming that his capital sentence was a "cruel and unusual" punishment that violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. This case also settled several other cases.

Read More
217 Words | 1 Pages

Joseph Kindler was convicted of murder in Pennsylvania in 1982. After robbing a music store and the police caught his accomplice who ratted him out, Kindler was seeking revenge. He went and found his former accomplice and beat him 20 times with a baseball bat and shocked him 5 times with an electric rod, then took him to a bridge, tied a cinder block to his neck and threw him into the river. The state jury's recommendation was the death penalty and Kindler was going to appeal but he escaped to Canada so the court dismissed his post verdict motions. When Canadian authorities captured him for burglary in Canada they were going to convict him but he was able to flee.

Read More
1113 Words | 5 Pages

Finally, the third time they took the case to court, the guy plead guilty. He’s in jail today. In addition to the homicide case, he also was involved in a suicide incident of a guy named Ryan and his baby named Helen. It all started with Ryan getting into an argument with the mom of the baby.

Read More
588 Words | 3 Pages

Between the states of Georgia and Ohio, he’d been locked up 19 times according to the Associated Press. Some of those convictions were for carrying a concealed weapon, robbery, and obstruction of a law enforcement officer, according to reports. His family actually lives in Brooklyn (the place where he ended up taking his own life), and he has a past history of trouble with police in that New York borough as

Read More
914 Words | 4 Pages

Imagine being the “chosen one” on a kill list made by your friends. One of the many teen cases in juvenile justice was the disgraceful murder of a 16 year old student, Cassie Stoddart, murdered by her two friends, Torey Adamcik and Brian Draper on September 22, 2006. Both Torey and Brian were found guilty of First Degree Murder, charged as adults, and given life in prison with no possibility of parole plus 30 years for committing. I believe their punishment is deemed fair and right. Background on victim Cassie Stoddart was a bright, young, responsible, and popular student; She was always told she had the perfect life, perfect grades, and was always praised by many in her community.

Read More
1533 Words | 7 Pages

While the popular image of the Confederacy, and indeed the Secessionist Southern States as a whole, are looked at as containing white populations uniformly supportive of the Confederate cause, the reality is more complex. As portrayed in Victims: A True Story of the Civil War and Free State of Jones there existed sizable pockets of dissent among the populace whom the Confederate government failed to convert to the cause. In places like the mountains of western North Carolina and southeastern Mississippi this led to desertion, passive resistance, and even outright armed rebellion which sapped Confederate resources that were needed to continue to fight the Union. Though this anti-Confederate feeling would often translate into support for the Union, this was not based on some inherent loyalty to the Federal government. As shown in Victims and Free State of Jones the disunity within the Confederacy stemmed from the failure of the Confederate government to get their non-slave holding lower classes to buy into the pro-slavery ideology of the nation, which was compounded by the lower classes bearing many of the harsh measures of the war including the draft and the

Read More
935 Words | 4 Pages

He spent 14 years on death row before he was injected with a lethal drug which killed him. (Crime

Read More
682 Words | 3 Pages

Juvenile delinquency is the violations of the criminal law by any minor. Minors are considered to be anyone under the age of eighteen, or in some states, under the age of seventeen or even sixteen. When a minor commits a crime that would have been a serious case if committed by an adult, they are considered a “juvenile delinquent.” The Lionel Tate case is one where the crime was acted upon by a minor. Lionel Tate was merely twelve years old when he murdered a young six-year-old girl whom his mother was babysitting.

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

Although African Americans have been considered free in terms of the law, in some states, especially Mississippi in the early sixties, the Caucasian population had not evolved past the discrimination and hate they felt towards African Americans. But there were people that wanted to help the African Americans in the deep South. These Civil Rights activists were the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee(SNCC)(Wisconsin). College students from all over America were recruited to help the African Americans with their racial injustice. Freedom summer wanted to do three things for the Mississippi blacks (Wisconsin).

Read More
2470 Words | 10 Pages

Jessie Townsend May 3rd, 2016 Prof. Allen Wong ASOC283 Why Kids Get Life The documentary “When Kids Get Life” delves into four cases involving juveniles who are serving life without parole in Colorado prisons. All of these juveniles are serving this time due to first degree murder among other charges they have received. The ages of these juveniles at the time of their crimes range from fifteen to seventeen and all of them still currently remain incarcerated. By applying different delinquency theories to each case, there is a chance that one could explain or even rationalize why these juveniles committed the crimes that they did.

Read More
1528 Words | 7 Pages

Crimes are happening around us whether we pay attention to them or not. Those crimes as dangerous as murder are committed by all ages but should younger criminal in their juvenile age received the same punishment as older criminals. On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that juveniles committed murder could not be sentenced to life in prison because it violates the Eighth Amendment.(On-Demand Writing Assignment Juvenile Justice) Advocates on the concurring side believes that mandatory life in prison is wrong and should be abolish. However, the dissenting side believe that keeping the there should be a life in prison punishment for juvenile who commit heinous crime regardless of their age.

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

He had to come back to his mom and his mom sent him to live with his grandparents. On the morning of August 27, 1964 he shot both of his grandparents and when being asked he told that “he just wanted to see how does it feel like to kill grandma” and he killed his grandfather because he knew that his grandfather will be mad at him for killing his grandma. After this incident

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

In 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that it is immoral to give juveniles life sentences, even if they commit a crime as serious as murder, because it is a cruel and unusual punishment. This has been an issue in America as teenagers are often treated as adults in court due to a belief that their crimes warrant a harsh punishment. Many believe that these kids should not be given such major sentences because they are still immature and do not have the self control that adults do. I agree that juveniles do not deserve life sentences because they put less thought and planning into these crimes and they often are less malicious than adults. The article “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” explains that the teenagers lose brain tissue that is responsible for self control and impulses (Thompson 7).

Read More
649 Words | 3 Pages

Finally, in the fifth count of her complaint, Ellina states a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”). “[T]o impose liability for intentional infliction of emotional distress: (1) The conduct must be intentional or reckless; (2) The conduct must be extreme and outrageous; (3) There must be a causal connection between the wrongful conduct and the emotional distress; (4) The emotional distress must be severe.” Harris v. Jones, 281 Md. 560, 566 (1977). Critically, the intent requirement of the tort requires the tortfeasor to have acted intentionally or recklessly. Indeed, in her complaint, Ellina alleges that Gil “intentionally and/or recklessly engaged in conduct . . .”

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Jones Vs State Of Mississippi

Related Topics

Open Document