ipl-logo

Gregory Lee Johnson's Impact On The US

1550 Words7 Pages

Gregory lee Johnson, was convicted of burning the American flag which violates the Texas Penal Code. Burning the American flag is unconstitutional to some and to others it is protected by the first amendment. This is a huge controversial argument between many american citizens. Some say that it doesn't have a big impact on the US, but really it has a bigger impact than I ever imagined. The Texas vs Johnson case had a big impact on the United States because it shows us how the 1st amendment guarantees us many different rites that we didn’t know about. The constitutional issue in this case was the 1st amendment. Gregory Lee Johnson was tried for burning an American flag but the Supreme court decided he wasn’t guilty. They said that it was …show more content…

He was stunned that he was arrested because all along he thought what he was doing was protected by the 1st amendment, the freedom of speech, assembly, press and petition. When his court date arrived, he was tried and convicted of Violation of the Texas Penal code which is a set of prohibitions or laws set to keep people safe. He was also sentenced with 1 year in prison and a $2,000 fine. After this ruling he decided to appeal the court's decision and went to the Texas Court of Appeals. The Texas Court of Appeals overturned Gregory Lee Johnson conviction saying that the Texas law wasn’t written narrowly enough and also saying that what Johnson did didn’t harm anyone and also it didn’t disturb the peace. After he was appealed, Texas decided to appeal the case again, this time to the Supreme Court.

June 21, 1989, The Supreme Court came to a decision. It was a close decision with a 5-4 win in Johnson's favor. The high court agreed that no matter how offensive to some, symbolic speech is protected by the First Amendment. There had been many other cases before this one that had been about desecrating or burning the american flag. It started all the way back in 1907, and since then states had been making laws to limit what you can do to the american flag until 1989 when the …show more content…

Many people were still disputing the fact that someone can burn a protected object and can burn the American flag. This decision was very controversial and was a bad decision in my opinion. There were many more flag burnings after they passed this act making it hard to rule all of them and I think that something like the american flag shouldn’t be able to be set on fire and desecrated. I think if something like the confederate flag is being banned in some places, the american flag shouldn’t be able to be desecrated. If the Supreme Court would have just voted against Gregory Lee Johnson, this whole situation with burning the American flag wouldn’t be

Show More
Related
1872 Words | 8 Pages

According to Robert T. Schatz and Howard Lavine, "the power of national symbols to rouse impassioned emotion and behavior has been noted by scholars from a variety of disciplines." It is not surprising that those who are passionate about the patriotism that comes along with a display of the American flag would be offended by such a blatantly disrespectful action against the flag. However, just because something is considered offensive does not necessarily mean it should be prohibited by

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

John H. Ferguson was the judge on the case and decided to uphold the state law. The law was challenged in the supreme court on grounds that it conflicted with the the 13th and the 14th amendments. By a seven to one majority vote, the controversial “separate but equal” doctrine. It was the the seminal post-Reconstruction Supreme court decision that judicially validated state sponsored segregation in public facilities. In a misguided decision, the court ruled that blacks and whites could be separated in public life if the accommodations were equal.

Read More
995 Words | 4 Pages

Today we see a lot of protesting and opinions being stated all over social media. In the late 1960s the United States started to get involved in the Vietnam War, which started a lot of protests because people did not want to fight in a war that mainly did not concern them. In 1968, David O’Brien wanted to express his disapproval of the war (United States v. O’Brien). So, while standing outside the Boston Courthouse, he decided to burn his drafting card in front of quite a few people (United States v. O’Brien). He did this so he could exercise his first amendment right, which is the freedom of speech and/or press (United States v. O’Brien).

Read More
249 Words | 1 Pages

The Supreme Court did not share Lincoln’s opinion. Especially, the Chief Justice Roger Taney who, in his role as the federal circuit judge, ruled that Lincoln’s suspension of Habeas Corpus was unconstitutional in a decision called Ex Parte Merryman. He did so after his recommendation for a trial of Merryman in order to determine if there were any legitimate reasons for his arrest met if refusal form Merryman captors. In the end, The President ignored Taney ruling, and Congress never contested Lincoln’s Habeas Corpus decision. Lincoln also met with strong resistance form the general public in regards to his executive order.

Read More
608 Words | 3 Pages

UNIT 6 DBQ Andrew Jackson once said “Every good citizen makes his country’s honor his own, and cherishes it not only as precious but as sacred. He is willing to risk his life in its defense and its conscious that he gains protection while he gives it.” Andrew Jackson was the 7th president of the United States from 1829 to 1837 and brought many changes to the government. He had a political movement during the Second Party System, along with his supporters, called Jacksonian democracy. It was founded in 1828, a year before his presidency.

Read More
493 Words | 2 Pages

Johnson for burning american flag, then pulled into custody and arrested for action of illegal to destroy items or things that are considered to be respected. The part has some twisted in article, people in the article believed that was freedom of conscience or expression. It’s okay to disagreed with government’s law, but failed to show a neglect for america, then Johnson would put citizen in jeopardy and therefore it is a considering a threat to Government. So, if they would burn the fire at somewhere that is not exposing to people or being seen on National Television than causing a problem and lead to

Read More
990 Words | 4 Pages

Introduction “Yesterday is not ours to recover, but tomorrow is ours to win or lose. ”(“LBJ Quotes.”). Johnson was a man who didn 't focus on the past but spent his life to make the future better. He didn 't want power for himself but to empower the people that were poor and discriminated. Lyndon B. Johnson was a great leader and person who grew through all his struggles, and left a lasting positive impact on civil rights in this country.

Read More
520 Words | 3 Pages

The law in Texas at the time banned flag burnings. He was convicted, and the case was appealed to the Supreme Court. We ruled that Johnson’s right to free speech had been violated. He was expressing symbolic speech. We ruled that even though an opinion is unpopular, doesn’t mean we have the right to restrict his freedom of

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

Many people have their own opinions, some say that the flag represents freedom while others say that the flag represents their nationalities. Throughout history the controversial topic of whether or not the disrespecting of the flag should be allowed has been discussed. In 1988 the U.S supreme court made a vote deciding that a person has the right to express this agreement by burning the American flag. However even though it was an executive decision it should be eradicated. The burning of the flag disrespects the most loved and important symbol of a nation and its people which is just immoral.

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

Out of around one hundred demonstrators who were included in this protest, Johnson was exclusively charged with the crime of burning the American flag. Johnson was indicted under Texas law, which made the burning of the national or the state flag a crime. Johnson was indicted and sentenced

Read More
788 Words | 4 Pages

Georgia and other states protested this decision saying states had “Sovereign Immunity”. Sovereign Immunity says that states can do as they please and face no legal consequences. The court denied their claim saying Article three, section two allowed them to try the case. This only caused more protest about the Supreme Court having too much power.

Read More
595 Words | 3 Pages

Stop Burning the American Flag! Ronald Reagan once said, “When we honor our flag we honor what we stand for as a Nation - freedom, equality, justice, and hope.” The Texas v. Johnson case is a vast problem that seems to be overpowering in today’s society. Since the case began there have been flag burnings all over the country, and no one seems to be concerned since people are not getting disciplined. People should not be burning the flag that so many people fight and lost their lives for.

Read More
514 Words | 3 Pages

Whether flag burning should be protected or not began to be questioned in 1984 when a protester, Gregory Lee Johnson set an American Flag on fire. He was punished with a fine and a jail term. He appealed and the case was sent to the Supreme Court to decide whether

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

Perry court case. Thomas Van Orden sued Texas saying that having the Ten Commandments by the state capitol building is unconstitutional because it shows the government endorsing one religion. He argued that this violated the First Amendment’s establishment clause that prohibits the government from establishing one religion. The District Court and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Van Orden because the statute didn’t have a specific purpose except just being a statute and that the government didn’t endorse the Christian

Read More
1238 Words | 5 Pages

Johnson” and the 1990 case of “The United States v. Eichman”. These two cases have set the precedence and law for the United States referring to the first amendment right to freedom of speech and the burning of the flag. Both cases were won by a five to four majority and the issue has yet to be brought back to the Supreme Court with a real argument or to pass through both houses of congress in an attempt to make an amendment to the constitution. The issue however, should not be whether it is your first amendment right to burn the flag, rather it should be, is it legal to set fire to objects in a form of protest in public? The overwhelming answer to this would be absolutely not, lighting trashcans and cars on fire is illegal, so why is it not illegal to burn a flag during your “peaceful” protest?

Read More

More about Gregory Lee Johnson's Impact On The US

Related Topics

Open Document