Group Thinking And Group Decision Making

Introduction

According to dictionary .com the definition of group think is the practice of approaching for solutions which mostly dealt with understanding of a group rather than individuals acting independently, as well as conformity. In addition Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon that is that is occurring in the group thinks and its need is in harmony or conformity of the group results in a way of irrational or dysfunctional decision making out come. Groupthink is a certain members control the ground for decision. In a group decision individuals are always swallowed or dominated by the group. Even if from the group one has got different and better for decision the individual normally dominated. The group decisions are accompanied by

These isolated or nonmembers of the decision making bodies, have been brought to the meetings and they appeared with critical ideas which will be useful for the group and may their comments provide success in persuading or influence them with their assumption. If group isolation helps to promote group think, which known as mindless and dehumanized polices there should be steps taken to prevent insulation for the members of a policy planning group.

The steps as follows,

1.All members of planning group should discuss carefully with their associates within their home or office those who are considered trusted ones and to report back to the planning group the outcomes gained from where the source related to comparatively independent thinkers.

2. To invite all policy making groups, including the representative from other branches who are known as critical thinkers and experts from outside including their colleagues even if they are not core members of policy making regardless all are assumed sensitive to moral issues and they have the ability of presenting their ideas effectively, and this will be the so called a safeguard. The invitation from outsiders helps to find the facts experience gained from the Cuba missile crises and it gives an opportunity to debate openly their rejections as well. This reminds the CIA leader’s domination

So damaging symptoms of groupthink are preventable by eliminating group insulations which ever come from directive leadership that practices, and additional conditions which encourage premature cooperation seeking. Awareness of these provisional conclusions are useful for those who participate in policy-making groups, if it is admitted by them. They may consider introducing one or another counter act presentation , prescription which is listed , providing of course that they have alternatives and aware of the lost, both in time and the result of an attempt to realize and to look for other side effects the decision is made and any of the prescription as standard operating