ipl-logo

Gun Laws Pros And Cons

1624 Words7 Pages

The gun debate issue is a controversial topic in the United States with the last school shooting in Parkland, Florida. Many people do not know what an effective legislative response to something like this, and that is where the debate comes in. Some offer bans on certain weapons and even an all out gun ban, while others offer stricter background checks or armed guards on campus. However, no matter what belief a person has, right now the Second Amendment is a right of all United States Citizens and it is a important component for the protection of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
The sole purpose of a gun is to do damage and all guns have the potential to do damage. This fact however, does not mean that they are inherently bad. …show more content…

The court case, however, did not state whether or not private citizens have the right to own weapons. The argument on whether private citizens can own firearms or just a regulated militia has been decided in the courts recently with the 2008 Supreme Court Case, District of Columbia v. Heller. The court decision ruled, “The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home” (District of Columbia v. Heller, 2008) With this simple ruling, it has been decided that the Second Amendment protects the individual right to own a …show more content…

Because of this it is important to make well thought, researched, and intelligent decisions when putting in legislation to limit it. Statistically, guns have been proven to protect and defend law abiding citizens while deterring criminals from committing crimes against them. They are vital for the protection of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

References
Check, T. (2015). Is the right to bear arms an example of "unpopular constitutionalism"? comparing modern and historical opinions on the Second Amendment. Faulkner Law
Review, 6(2), 283+.
Coulter, A. (2007). Let's Make America a 'Sad-Free Zone’. Human Events, 63(6).
Denning, B. P., & Reynolds, G. H. (2002, Spring). Telling Miller's tale. Law and Contemporary
Problems, 65(2), 113+.
District of Columbia v. Heller, U.S (2008).
Kleck, G., & Gertz, M. (1998). Carrying guns for protection: results from the National
Self-Defense Survey. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35(2), 193+.
Murphy, S., Xu, J., Kochanek, K., Curtain, S., & Arias, E. (2015, November). Deaths: Final data for 2015. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 66(6), 13.
Plassmann, F., & Whitley, J. (2003, April). Confirming "more guns, less crime". Stanford Law
Review, 55(4), 1313+.
United States v. Miller, U.S

Show More
Related
687 Words | 3 Pages

As a final point, this chapter talks about the statistics of crime and how it effects the law-abiding citizens. Lott shows to the world how concealed firearms can change citizens lives for the better in this book. In Lott’s argument, he urges for those who haven’t taken advantage of their second amendment to do so. This argument has been effective overall due to his supporting evidence of crime rates and how people lives are changed with a way to protect their

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

This source is about the second amendment and clearly states what the Constitution has written about the right to bear arms. This article is from the New York Times and the author believes there is no need to revise or rewrite the Constitution. I used this source in my argument about the second amendment and in the rebuttal against it. Since this article is published by a man who is pro-second amendment, it shows me a side of the topic that I personally do not believe in. This helps me be more educated about the second amendment, that way my paper will not be so biased.

Read More
1721 Words | 7 Pages

The Gun Lobby and the National Rifle Association mistakenly believe that the Second Amendment not only guarantees an individual’s right to own firearms, but also limits the making and enforcement of any laws limiting the use of and ownership of guns. There is no constitutional law that prevents the government from limiting personal access to firearms through legal means. The argument over the right to bear arms should not be about whether the right belongs to the people; but rather, it should address the purpose and scope of that right. According to Dennis Henigan (2005), “Arms-bearing in the well-regulated militia was a duty owed to the government, not a personal right to be exercised against the government,” (D 21). The right to keep and bear arms is basically different from the other guarantees in the Bill of Rights.

Read More
1485 Words | 6 Pages

One of the most debatable issues in the U.S. today is the issue of gun control and how people should go about modernizing the forces surrounding citizens ' power to have and employ firearms. The Second Amendment of the US Constitution ensures that people have the ability to own and carry weapons. Others contend that this provision should be kept in place, despite numerous individuals saying it should be amended or removed. There are several reasons why the Second Amendment should be amended or abolished, according to those who make this argument.

Read More
95 Words | 1 Pages

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of the individual to keep and bear firearms. When the Second Amendment was written it was for the right to arm oneself as a personal liberty to deter undemocratic or oppressive governing bodies from forming and to repel impending invasions. Furthermore, gun advocates proclaim that guns are for the right to self-defense. Some people try to participate and uphold the law. We have seen how guns in the hands of children can cause fatal accidents and people have committed mindless crimes leading to

Read More
1219 Words | 5 Pages

Violent crimes reported on the news while still surprising to hear and see has become very common. While the numbers seem to be overwhelming, statistics share violent crimes are at an all-time low. While the numbers of crimes are decreasing, gun ownership is increasing. Begging one to ask if the right to conceal to carry reduce

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

Some days crime rates are up and then the next they are down, what we do know is that America is becoming safer. In 2005, 11,346 persons were killed by firearm violence 477,040 persons were victims of a crime committed with a firearm, (National Institute of Justice). Surprisingly, a lot of gun violence in America is related to self defense. Between 1987 and 1990 it was found that guns were used in defense during a crime incident 64,615 times annually. This equates to two times out of 1,000 incidents (0.2%) that occurred in this time frame.

Read More
828 Words | 4 Pages

The second amendment and gun control are one of the highly debated topics in the United States. Many people argue that second amendment is dangerously leading to gun violence and it should be controlled to avoid further unfortunate incidents. While on the other hand, others believe that right to bear arm is very important because it protects them from criminals. But isn’t people’s life more worthy than right to carry guns? So,the U.S government should find the best way to make strong and effective gun laws and lessen gun use to protect people from gun violence.

Read More
1549 Words | 7 Pages

Debates about the Second Amendment have focused on its parameter to protect private rights of individual people to possess firearms, and the ability to be apart of militia organizations. The world has seen a drastic change since the implementation of the amendment in 1791. Civilian ran militias are almost obsolete, and most militias are now ran and regulated by state governments. The military of the United states has also seen a dramatic increase, and is undoubtedly more powerful. For the most part, civilians are no longer expected or desire to be apart of a militia, however firearms are still essential for self defence, hunting, and

Read More
641 Words | 3 Pages

The Second Amendment to the Constitution, which concerns the right to bear arms, is always a hot-button issue, especially during election season. Gun rights and gun control groups alike have been lobbying Congress for decades to craft legislation in their respective favors. While many citizens think gun be banned, there is a huge among of people who still disagree. Whether gun should be prohibited or not it is still mystery to American. Proponents of more gun control laws state that the Second Amendment intended for militias; that gun violence would be reduced; that gun restrictions have always existed; and that a majority of Americans, including gun owners, support new gun restrictions.

Read More
880 Words | 4 Pages

To begin with, If we glance at the second amendment every citizen has a right to bear arms. The Second Amendment, which states: "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall be infringed. " This

Read More
1991 Words | 8 Pages

The Second Amendment says, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Gun rights has become the subject of intense political, social, and cultural battles for much of the last century. The pro-gun right side has asserted that the right to arms was absolute, and that any gun control laws infringed that right (Kopel, 2013). This right has been supported by the Supreme Court who has reinforced what has become the American consensus that the Second Amendment allows the right to keep and bear arms, especially for self-defense, and that it is a fundamental individual

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Since the begining of America, the Founding Fathers wrote the strong-standing Bill of Rights with amendments to protect the country that had just recently won their freedom, but one amendment has been the top theme of controversies for centuries. Gun laws offend the Bill of Rights in so many ways and they prove ineffective. Gun Laws are relevant due to thousands of deaths and self-protection. The argument goes on but without guns there is militia, one of the main intents of the Second Amendment. These simple rules can reduce deaths, proven by millions of influential people.

Read More
1386 Words | 6 Pages

According to the Second Amendment, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment specifically states that “the right of the people to keep

Read More
753 Words | 4 Pages

Gun Laws According to the Second Amendment in the Constitution, the citizens have the right to possess and bear arms. But, this has remained an important issue since decades. Issues such as gun control and gun rights have remained a matter of debate and have been lobbying around in the Congress meetings. This has resulted in the immense debate about the mass shooting that have become a frequent crime in the United States.

Read More

More about Gun Laws Pros And Cons

Related Topics

Open Document