Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Modern gun control debate
Modern gun control debate
Modern gun control debate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Modern gun control debate
Modern gun control debate
Modern gun control debate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Gun control has been a controversial issue for years and numerous solutions have been proposed and enacted. The debate sparked after tragic civilian attacks, like school shootings. An example, is the tragedy in 1999 at Columbine High School. Two teens attacked the school, killing 13 people and wounding more than 20 others before killing themselves. Following this attack, numerous solutions have been argued and purposed.
Firearms hold the power to destroy live in a matter of moments. Within the ever-evolving society of today, one aspect remains a relatively constant--gun violence. It has not only remained present on the mainstage of the world, but has begun to take on more and more of a presence. Throughout the developed nations, a debate has been ongoing, the debate on the correct path in limiting the firearm-related crime. Now, in a world ravaged by the atrocities of gun massacres, many countries have begun to take steps towards a more progressive set of gun laws.
Introduction Looking at the nightly news, many would believe violent crimes are at an all-time high. There are not just one on one violent crimes or gang violent crimes. There is court shootings, school shootings, church shootings, theater shootings, mall shootings, workplace shootings, and others. Where most one on one crime is committed with illegal guns, mass shootings are done with handguns purchased legally.
Another way they can eliminate these problems is “gun-running”, where an individual can purchase an unrestricted quantity of firearms and transport them to a state with weaker gun laws, several states have enacted one-gun-a-month policies that limit gun buyers to one gun purchase in a 30-day period” (Torr 37). This new law decision could help the victimization rates decrease. Many cases have occurred over the recent years and have increased, but if they make this new law known and out to the public, then it could possibly make a safer place for many victims out there in today’s society, and possibly help others who are struggling as well with these problems that are happening more frequently as the years
Everyone wants a safer community to live in, and keeping guns out of the hands of dangerous people is the number one goal. The policies that have been proposed to accomplish this have been diverse and debated. Two sides have formed on a specific procedure to lower the gun violence: those who want age restrictions on guns to keep them out of the hands of the younger generation
On the issue of gun control, I had always thought along the lines of opposing or supporting the issue but had never thought that there could be another argument different from these two main ones that could be discussed. It was therefore quite refreshing to look at the issue from Novak’s point of view. The fact that he provided evidence to support his claim that law enforcement has worked before in reducing gun violence cases made his article all the more interesting and believable. He shows that the debate on gun control may just have been pointless all this time as the issue that should be discussed is really not whether people should have guns or not but rather how to enforce the law to ensure that perpetrators of gun violence are
A weapon in the wrongs hands is the maximum danger humanity can face. Nowadays, violence and delinquency in society are viewed as the maximum problem solver. Humanity is full of chaos; hate and envy seize our souls. Guns are the ultimate security for some citizens but for others, these add to a feeling of defenselessness. Throughout history, any topic related to guns means a plethora of problems.
The use of and the owning of guns is a very hot and debated topic in society today. For many, this is a life and death debate due to the recent and numerous school shootings. These school shootings have caused an outcry for more gun control, specifically in relation to the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Despite these calls, increased gun control is not the answer. Most gun owners’ use their guns responsibly and for good purposes.
On, February 14, 2018, a mass school shooting in Florida got the nation’s attention, however, gun violence has always been an issue, and it is only getting worse. Now people are saying there needs to be something done, and there are many that agree. Starting off there should be stricter gun laws, because in today’s world it is too easy to get handguns and assault rifles. With, the capabilities a firearm holds, such as taking people’s lives there must be stricter restrictions that could help cut down the gun violence and save lives. Increasing the age of purchasing a firearm would be one step.
Have you ever wondered what you would do if someone was pointing a gun towards you? For most people, this is not something that they want to, or ever will experience. However, for several people in the USA, and the world in general, this nightmare has become reality, and in many cases, especially in the last few months, these kinds of news often refer to the USA, and the disagreements about the gun control laws and mass shootings. The gun control laws in the US should be restricted to make a safer everyday life for everyone. All around the world, the laws for buying any form for weapon in form of guns, firearms and pistols are different.
In fact, this issue is broad and has different faces depending on which angle you look at it. This paper will analyze the different faces of the issue, those who are mostly affected by gun violence, the areas with the most numbers of gun related violence as well as the periods that were mostly
In 2000, nearly 30,000 people died due to uncontrollable gun violence even though the U.S. has thousands of gun laws. Gun control is now one of the main political issues because of all the shootings in the past decade (Slideshare). President Obama stated that “gun violence has reached a crisis point we must address” (“Watch”). Everyone believes that once gun control is implemented the government will take the guns away or outlaw them but this is not true. What gun control means is that certain types of guns will not be available.
This paper also provides an interesting solution to gun violence; instead of already proven ineffective gun control laws, these authors suggest looking at why these laws are ineffective. Planty, Michael, and Jennifer
Title: Gun Violence As I write this introduction, I am like millions of others watching the tragedy in Louisiana and Alabama caused by hurricane Katrina. A small but important part of the devastation and the challenge is the existence of individuals and groups of citizens from the area mostly impacted by the storm who used guns against their neighbours and those attempting to assist them. In any other industrialised nation, this will never happen because it will eventually cause the level of socialisation to decline due to the issue pertaining citizens getting the ready access towards guns. Most likely, gun violence is categorised as the most highly anticipated violence around the world because it is growing rapidly and causes
Instead of banning or limiting guns, the evidence will show that removing the current restrictions and targeting individuals instead of guns will be a more effective process. The topic of gun control has two polarized opinions. One such opinion targets the individuals responsible for the crime, instead of just the weapons. John Moorhouse and Brent Wanner tackle the issue of gun control in their article “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control”, which was published in 2006 in the twenty-sixth volume of the Cato Journal. These researchers looked at the effects gun control laws had on violent crime and gun violence in the individual states.