ipl-logo

Han And Roman Attitudes Towards Technology

1086 Words5 Pages

Kursat Cakar Pd.2 Han vs Roman Around the first millennium the Han and Roman attitudes towards technology were both self-adoring, but the Han Empire focused more value on technology and technological enhancements than the Roman Empire, with evidence about the constant concern on the Han dynasty over indifference on the part of the Romans. To state, each and every document used as evidence for this essay is written by an official or any upper classmen. So these documents show no insight on technology from the view of a peasant or lower classmen. These documents provide this limited view on technology for each empire since the upperclassmen weren’t even the majority of the populations. On top of the peasants or other lower classes there were …show more content…

This is very obvious straight from Document 5, Cicero, upper-class Roman political leader, On Duty, first century B.C.E. when Cicero says,” All craftsmen spend their time in vulgar occupations; no workshop can have anything enlightening about it.”. Cicero shows and has no respect at all towards any inventions that have been invented by commoners, the upper-class Romans just don’t care. On the contrary the Romans care about upper-class inventions or ideas like Plutarch explaining Gaius Gracchus who was anxious in inventing or enhancing roads Document 6, Plutarch, Greek-born Roman citizen and high official, describing second-century B.C.E. Roman political leader Gaius Gracchus, first century C.E. The romans basically viewed technology as useless unless it benefits the upper-class. Another upper-classmen also shows no care for inventions by the commoners or inventions for the commoners. On top of the upper-classmen not caring about the commoners inventions they also don’t care about the commoners considering that the roads would not benefit a commoner because they are not wealthy enough to afford transportation to even use the roads. In Document 7, Seneca, upper-class Roman philosopher and adviser to Emperor Nero, first century C.E. believed,” I do not believe that the tools for the crafts were invented by wise men.”, like the other upper-classmen he believes commoners and commoners who even make inventions are not significant and neither are their inventions. This is because the commoner’s inventions do not directly impact or benefit the upper-classmen leading them to deem the inventions and inventors useless. Although almost every upper-classmen only cared about inventions that benefited themselves there was one case where one of the upper-classmen actually had to do with an invention that benefited the commoners. “The water is

Show More
Related
347 Words | 2 Pages

The fall of Classical Rome and Han China had both similar reasons and different reasons for their downfall. Rome collapsed from the inside and was invaded a lot. Han China also collapsed from the inside because of lack of money. They were also invaded frequently.

Read More
173 Words | 1 Pages

The time is the third century BCE to the third century CE, two major world empires are in reign; these empires are Han China and Imperial Rome. Both of these empires rule in many of the same ways, yet are vastly different in the way they rule. During this time empires everywhere were growing, and people were learning to live in new ways as new forms of government become more present in society. In Han China, Emperor Gaozu takes over as first emperor as the Han Empire. His empire controls China for almost four hundred years.

Read More
417 Words | 2 Pages

Politically, both governments were corrupt. Not always in the same ways, but in the ways that they were similar, it was bloody and dark. In the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire, political figures were power hungry and ruthless to get what they wanted. In the Roman Empire, General Marius was elected consul 7 times in a row. General Marius was a valuable general but not a noble politician.

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

During the era of classical societies, the Han and Roman empires were two vast cosmopolitan societies which dominated regions all throughout Eurasia. In regards to the fall of the Han and Roman empires, both were similar in that they fell victim to internal government decay, but different in that Rome fell to foreign invasions, while Han suffered from rebellions of their own people. The Han and Roman empires were similar in their fall in that they both suffered from internal decay, specifically of their governments. In the Han empire, land distribution problems that were originally sought to be fixed by the “Socialist emperor” Wang Mang allowed large landowners to become even more influential than they previously were.

Read More
374 Words | 2 Pages

The Romans and the Han had similar methods of political control due to the fact that they both used their ancestors as a way to continue their political reign. For example, Roman senators would nominate their sons for public offices and in Han society dynastic control allowed a family to continuously reign. Women also played little to no roles in politics in Rome and Han China; however their methods of political control were different in that the Romans used wealth and property ownership as a deciding factor in appointing political leadership, while the Han was run under a dynasty which granted leadership within the ruling family. The Romans and Han used different methods of political control in their systems

Read More
1364 Words | 6 Pages

The Yuan Dynasty under the Mongol empire has an extensive amount of public works as they built granaries to protect the dynasty from famine, and created large road and water networks. These public works allowed for the people to have large surplus of food and water and also be able to travel in a more organized manner with the road system created (New World Encyclopedia, Country Studies). Everyone in the Yuan dynasty had access to these public works as they were used to the economy and to keep everyone fed. While having these very useful public works the Yuan dynasty also had lots of techniques using technology for warfare and engineering. While using new warfare technology from the Chinese the Yuan were able to create a strategy to take down fortification by studying the way forts were made.

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

At the beginning of the First Millennium The Romans and the people of the Han both extensively used technology to better themselves and eventually all of humanity. The Han empire in China placed more value on technology and technological enhancements then the Roman Empire did, proven by the constant concern of the Han dynasty over the indifference and almost disregard of the Romans. The Han were more accepting and open to technological advancements because they valued the farmers, and common people who they believed helped benefit society however, the Roman were only concerned with the upper class due to their dividing and conflicting social classes of Particans and Plebeians therefore their view of technology was that it was considered unimportant.

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

Many things effected the classical ages. The five classical ages being compared and contrasted are Greece, Rome, Han China, Gupta India, and Olmec. The size of territory and religion effected the legacy. Each age was impacted on either mathematical and scientific theories or their practical technology. Most classical ages had monumental buildings or important things.

Read More
708 Words | 3 Pages

In various ways, Han China and Imperial Rome were politically similar yet also had their pair of differences. Two very well-known classical empires, both had highly advanced political systems for their time; Han China, lasted from 206 B.C.E to 220 C.E, and Imperial Rome, lasted from 31 B.C.E to 476 C.E. Many think these two empires where built with no previous influence, however; the Roman Empire had retained many aspects from the Roman Republic, and Han China from the Qin Dynasty. During their peaks, they controlled the majority of the world 's population because of their constant expansion of conquered lands, while their structure of administration and rule influenced many empires and future societies around the world. Aspects such as these, ultimately, led these two empires to be, arguably, the most influential societies in the world; as their legacies still live on today.

Read More
891 Words | 4 Pages

In the fifth and seventh documents, we can see an upper-class Roman political leader and a Roman philosopher. The political leader Cicero, who would rarely be able to experience the direct benefits of craftsmanship, had a views of a craftsmen being a vulgar and unbecoming profession. He believes that the technology they use was not necessary to the culture of the empire, and that no workplace of craftsmanship could be enlightening. His point of view was partial to a easygoing

Read More
1525 Words | 7 Pages

The Han Dynasty in China and the Roman Empire shared many similarities and differences when it came to political rule and the nature of their political authority. The most significant difference between the two is how the Han dynasty enacted policies that were shaped to counter the wrongdoings of the previous Qin dynasty, whereas the Roman Empire enacted policies shaped to create and promote peace and stability. The difference in the two empire’s coming to power was to account for their variance in political rule. After the Qin dynasty, the Han ruled China for four centuries, enacting numerous political changes and governing one of the most efficacious dynasties in Chinese history.

Read More
941 Words | 4 Pages

Both documents, 6 and 8, highlight that the Romans were more interested in the physical appeal of technology than the actual uses and benefits that they

Read More
519 Words | 3 Pages

The Han Dynasty was one of the primer dynasties in the history of ancient China. During the Han Dynasty advancements were made in technology, science, and art. The advancements of science and medicine, technology, literature and architecture, were key to the growth of the Han Dynasty, the advancements in these categories are what makes the Han Dynasty one of the primer dynasties of ancient China. One of most important achievements of the Han Dynasty was their advancements of their science and medicine.

Read More
50 Words | 1 Pages

The Tang dynasty cherished a golden Age of innovation and success in science and technology culminating into the Song dynasty. The broad exchange of goods and information through the Tang dynasty with high value placed on observation and examination defined the Song and set the footing for rigorous scientific innovation.

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

Technology can be defined as “the branch of knowledge that deals with the creation and use of technical means and their interrelation with life, society, and the environment”. (n.d.) Therefore, when we speak of technological evolution we can say that it is an “innovation and technology related hypothesis that describes the fundamental change of society through technical development”. Different theorists have their own perspective on the evolution of technology but, although each of their views differs from another, they shared certain common features, mechanism, and incidence in technology. Some theorists have developed distinct approaches to understanding the nature of the technological process and the relationship between technological development and the social world.

Read More

More about Han And Roman Attitudes Towards Technology

Related Topics

Open Document