ipl-logo

Happiness And Utilitarianism

1627 Words7 Pages

Utilitarianism argues that human happiness is an ethical goal. How can HRM/CPM contribute to this goal? The concept of Utilitarianism and happiness both encounter certain propagandas when it comes to its theorization due to its relativity to its variables. Mill's utilitarian concept advocates the fundamental stance whereby mass positive externality assures maximized average happiness despite it may urge individuals to "sacrifice" for mass goodness (Mill, 1863). Similarly, happiness is subjectively relative which may vary depending on the context and also the same situation may vary from the pretext; hence it is impossible to "prove" the viability of happiness and utilitarianism in an individual level (VEENHOVEN, 1990). The concept of Utilitarianism …show more content…

However, Klikauer's (2014) argument also, does reflect that HRMs do practice ethicality and morality within the parameters of their organization, however, doesn’t necessarily tally with utilitarianism's concept of greater good. Thus, the concept of ethics, happiness and utilitarianism should be systematically practiced in accordance to the ultimate ends. For example; I had personally surveyed Yak and Yeti, a 5 star hotel in Nepal, post earthquake to understand the impact of earthquake and during my visit I overheard a bunch of employees saddened by the decrease in hoteliers. I was confused because they should rather be happy as they were less burdened and when I asked them why they were bummed I was surprised to realize that the monthly profit in the hotel was shared equally amongst the top most to the lowest. The positive externality, fairness, respect and morality encouraged the employees to work as if it were their own hence reflecting on how morality of ends sufficiently accords with the means; positive ends, positive means. The HRM should encourage and reflect on the greater good but also the positive externality of it towards the doers; by this, the doers do not feel like sacrificial bates which impedes future consequences. Incorporating theories such as mutual gain perspective optimizes greater goodness and at the same time increase happiness (Voorde, Paauwe, & Veldhoven, 2011). Furthermore, value based relationship also promotes positive externality as it promotes communion, trust, honesty and a sense of achievement as it promotes maximum utility which gives a sense of satisfaction

Show More
Related
1831 Words | 8 Pages

How can a person quantify the happiness of actions. If you had to cause the death of someone, how would that affect the overall happiness gained by saving five more. People are not simple creatures where five minus one equals four. People are complex and feel different emotions from one another. This makes it hard to implement utilitarianism as a proper response to the scenario.

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

The purpose of this essay is to pick apart Mill’s essay and to give my own personal opinion about happiness. Stuart believed that you could achieve happiness by helping others achieve happiness and by finding things that you enjoy in life. I believe the key to happiness is helping other people achieve their happiness, do things that you enjoy doing, and looking at things in the brightest way possible. I honestly believe that everyone wakes up in the morning wanting to be happy, I have never seen a person who wakes up saying, “ I want to have an absolutely miserable day today”. It is human nature to strive for happiness and do things that you enjoy to do.

Read More
1805 Words | 8 Pages

M. Hare’s argument, it can be seen that there exists some issues with utilitarianism. Or, simply apply utilitarianism to this world, and use utilitarianism code to make every decision is wrong since the code of utilitarianism loss consistency in real world. According to utilitarianism, the best moral action is the one that maximizes utility, or happiness. However, happiness is complex. It is generally acknowledged that people who have their physical and emotional needs satisfied and their human rights guaranteed are happy.

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

Utilitarianism is the theory that we should always try to bring about as much happiness as possible. It is hard to argue against the value of being happy, but critics are quick to point out that we value many other things as well. (Sir Bernard Williams, Rachels, 2010, p. 40) For me, this subject can be quite a tough one, and I will be honest, it is seriously causing me to think. The best way I can think of is this.

Read More
1010 Words | 5 Pages

A number of problems surround the second question; the most obvious of which are limited time, the limited capacity of human foresight to calculate the maximum number of happiness, and the inability of the theory to advise on the time frame utilitarianism is to be applied to; how do you know the maximum number of happiness for the next 10 years doesn’t mean greater overall unhappiness in the next 50 years, so what time period should one keep in mind when considering an issue from a utilitarian stand point, 1 year, 5 years, 10, 20? This lack of clarity further adds to the impractical nature of the ideology. There are a myriad number of situations which seem very difficult to resolve without employing utilitarian principles and a very good example is the widespread use of utilitarian principles in bioethics. The best example here would obviously be the famous case of the conjoined twins Mary and Jodie. The facts in front of the court indicated that Mary was the parasitic twin who shared a heart with Jodie.

Read More
1385 Words | 6 Pages

Immanuel Kant and John Samuel Mill have various similarities and differences on how we see the world. Where both will have, different ideologies referring to the cases of rescue I and rescue II. Kant and Mill are similar in multiple ways where both recognize the moral rules where Kant calls them duties and Mill calls them subordinate principles. Both have the subordinate principles where not to lie, no to stealing, and deprive from liberty from others. Appealing the consequences of the derived duties, where Kant considers the consequence of Maxim to become a universal law of nature, Mill considers the consequence of kind action.

Read More
1218 Words | 5 Pages

The main principle of utilitarianism is happiness. People who follow this theory strive to fulfill the “ultimate good”. The “ultimate good” is defined as ultimate pleasure with out any pain. It is said that the pleasure can be of any quantity and any quality, but pleasures that are weighted more important are put at a higher level than others that are below it. This ethical theory also states that if society would fully embrace utilitarianism then people would naturally realize their moral standing in the

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

In Itself states that people should act in a certain way that you always treat humanity and always consider them as an end but never as mere means. This moral theory opposes to Utilitarianism, which supports the “greatest happiness principle”. According to “greatest happiness principle” people ought to act in such a way that produce the greatest amount of happiness for the

Read More
1018 Words | 5 Pages

An ethical dilemma today in society is that of abortion, which one would define as a deliberate end to a pregnancy. Various arguments exist questioning if an abortion is morally justifiable. Some say the state should decide on the legality of an abortion, some politicians say the federal government should decide, and many believe it should be up to the women since it pertains to their body. In this paper, I will analyze what a utilitarian’s perspective on abortion would be. First, let’s get a clear understanding of utilitarianism.

Read More
1413 Words | 6 Pages

Many classical philosophers have given their voice to the nature of human life and what entails its climax. The very nature of human beings has been investigated, broadly, to establish a comprehensive understanding often pegged on morality. Yet, such thoughts have prompted diverse viewpoints with accompanying grounds or reasons. Happiness is an unending topic of discussion in philosophy. This paper explores the similarities and differences in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics and John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism to coin a position in whether or not happiness is the ultimate end that human society aspires to acquire.

Read More
1564 Words | 7 Pages

John Stuart Mill, at the very beginning of chapter 2 entitled “what is utilitarianism”. starts off by explaining to the readers what utility is, Utility is defined as pleasure itself, and the absence of pain. This leads us to another name for utility which is the greatest happiness principle. Mill claims that “actions are right in proportions as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” “By Happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain, by happiness, pain and the privation of pleasure”.

Read More
1711 Words | 7 Pages

Suppose a conductor is driving his train and the breaks are defect. The rails lead directly into a cluster of five people who would all die if the train will go this direction. However, the conductor can change onto another track where only one person is standing hence only one person would die. How should the conductor react (Hare, 1964)? Is it possible to condense the problem to a rather simple maximization problem in example that the action is taken, which would kill the least people?

Read More
1005 Words | 5 Pages

The two moral reasonings are consequentialist and categorical. Consequentialist means the consequences that will result after whatever you do, whether it is the right or wrong thing to do. Categorical moral reasoning locates morality in certain duties and rights. Somethings are just morally wrong even if it brings good outcomes. According to Mill the principle of utility means realizing a consequence of something before you do it,whether your intentions are good or bad.

Read More
899 Words | 4 Pages

Think of some favorite memories or objects: the first love, favorite pet, favorite foods, or maybe even a good vacation. What do all of these have in common? When recalled, these memories or objects bring a sense of happiness that makes one think fondly of these things. Happiness is an emotion that the human race strives for. As Schoch explains, “Happiness is...

Read More
1037 Words | 5 Pages

Happiness is a Choice There is no greater feeling in the world than being happy. Believe it or not, happiness is a choice that comes from within. According to a theory in Psychology, all humans have a happiness “set- point” that determines their overall well-being. When something positive happens to a person, he becomes happy. On the other hand, when something negative happens to him, he becomes miserable.

Read More

More about Happiness And Utilitarianism

Related Topics

Open Document