Hierarchy Of The Ohio State University Housing Services Office

Analysis

Hierarchy

The Ohio State University Housing Services office has a clear hierarchy. As stated in the Formal Structure and Decision-Making sections above, the director of housing administration is at the top of the hierarchy. The hierarchy is more about leadership rather than domination. Since there is a sense of shared feeling or joint action and a narrow “social gap between the group members and the head,” the organizational setting would not be considered domination (Ianello 16). The leadership model that is most congruent with the Ohio State University Housing Services office is the transformational model. The director of administration is seen as “an agent who raises followers to a higher moral purpose (Models of Leadership, 1). In addition, she encourages “interdependent members of groups [to] share and coordinate activities to accomplish goals together” (Models of Leadership, 2). The Ohio State University Housing Services office is a perfect example of a decentralized setting. The critical decisions ae reserved by the director of administration while the routine decisions are delegated to the other full-time employees and student employees (Ianello, 20). This is beneficial for the director of administration because it allows her to focus on making the critical decisions, as

Apparent reasons lie in the authority and differentiation dimensions displayed in Table 1. According to Rothschild-Whitt, bureaucratic organizations have a hierarchical organization of offices, while the authority of a collectivist organization “resides in the collectivity as a whole” (Rothschild-Whitt, 24). In addition, within bureaucratic organizations with segmental roles, the jobs are specialized, whereas collectivist organizations have general jobs with holistic roles (Rothschild-Whitt,