ipl-logo

Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified Dbq Research Paper

709 Words3 Pages

After the atomic bombings, the immediate death toll was estimated to be around 140,000 in Hiroshima and 70,000 in Nagasaki. During World War II, the Pacific War was raging between Japan and the Allied forces, led by the United States. The strategy employed by the Allies was called "island hopping." It involved capturing key islands in the Pacific to establish airfields and secure supply lines. This allowed the Allies to gradually move closer to Japan. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were part of the effort to bring the war to a swift conclusion and prevent further loss of life. The dropping of the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justified. This claim can be supported by three reasons: Loss of innocent lives, Alternatives availability, and psychological …show more content…

(Document A, B) Finally, the dropping of the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justified when it came to psychological impact. This is exemplified by the text, “My private nurse set about examining my wounds without speaking a word. No one spoke... Why was everyone so quiet?...” This implies that the bombing was so horrible that it left survivors shocked and confused. According to the text, “Hiroshima is no longer a city but a burned-over prairie. To the east and to the west everything was flattened. In addition, this shows the overwhelming sense of loss and devastation Michihiko Hachiya and the survivors felt. This evidence shows that the dropping of the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justified because the atomic bombings had a devastating psychological impact on the survivors. (Document F) The immediate death toll in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was estimated to be around 140,000 and 70,000, respectively. That's a devastating loss of innocent lives. The bombings were a controversial part of World War

Show More
Related
1394 Words | 6 Pages

Name: Course Instructor: Class: Date: Critical Book Review: Prompt and Utter Destruction Introduction Within weeks, word on the US dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki began to spread that the main reason behind the bombs was to save the lives of Americans (Bernard). It was put that hundreds of thousands of American military causalities were saved through the bombings.

Read More
697 Words | 3 Pages

Also, a lot of people died in both the bombing of NAgasaki and Hiroshima. A chart shows that 135,000 people either died or were injured somehow, and at Nagasaki 64,000 people were killed or injured, proving that there is no way every single one of those people hurt were military. Therefore, the bomb was an awful solution to an almost solved

Read More
162 Words | 1 Pages

There is ample evidence to support the position that the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary in the surrender of Japan. It is seen that President Harry S. Truman had three reasons to proceed with the bombing. First, he assumed that the bomb would bring an end to the war. Second, Truman believed that the bomb would keep the USSR out of Asia. Lastly, he thought that dropping the bombs would be a way to test America’s new technology and observe the effects footnote 1.

Read More
670 Words | 3 Pages

If the bombs were not dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the United States would have lost at least one million American soldiers in a mainland invasion of Japan (Tucker, 5). That stated, dropping the bombs was the only viable option for sparing both American lives, as well as Japanese lives. The dropping of the bombs, albeit horrific, is justifiable because it saved millions of both American and Japanese lives, prevented the waste of valuable resources, and played a significant role in Japan's surrender. Dropping the bombs saved more lives than if the United States had done a land invasion (Walker, 5). If the war had been prolonged, the United States would have lost millions of lives (Tucker, 5); but the Japanese would also suffer.

Read More
690 Words | 3 Pages

When the United States dropped the two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, it showed the world that it had a capability for destruction the likes of which had never been seen before. Less than one week after the bombings, Japan agreed to an unconditional surrender with the Allied Powers, officially ending the second World War. While these attacks helped to finally bring an end to the largest global conflict in history, they are understandably still the topic of debate over seventy years later. Even though there are many negatives associated with the bombings, they were ultimately necessary because Japan would not have surrendered otherwise, and the lives of countless soldiers and Japanese civilians were spared because of the attacks.

Read More
522 Words | 3 Pages

“The dead from that one night’s bombing numbered 80,000 to 100,000- more than later died at Nagasaki and more than half the number who died in Hiroshima (The Atlantic Monthly July 2002: 22.).”It also turned everything to rubble as 7 to 15 square miles of Hiroshima was burnt. But the U.S had only tested the atomic bomb once and they were unknowing of the long term effects. In which they saw it as killing two birds with one stone. Which was ending the PTO war with the Japanese surrender and also putting the newly made atomic bomb to use. Though the U.S might have stopped the war, the bomb caused many casualties and destroyed a part of the Japanese cities.

Read More
1403 Words | 6 Pages

The use of the atomic bomb when strategically compared to a land invasion, in fact prevented the loss of any U.S. soldiers lives, as well as the death of many Japanese citizens. Excerpts from “Three Narratives of our Humanity” by John W, debates whether or not the nuclear bombing was necessary to shock the Japanese into surrender and describes how the Japanese recall the war through a lens of their own victimization. An excerpt claims, “it is argued that the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima was necessary to shock the Japanese to surrender”. This presents a compelling argument supporting the ethicality of the bombings through its logical and strategic worth.

Read More
1232 Words | 5 Pages

Although Harry S. Truman said that the bombs saved the Japanese from thousands of casualties, it caused even more, and especially worse suffering. In Hiroshima, the death toll was between 80,000 to 120,000 people. The Nagasaki bomb killed 35,000 to 74,000. Even after the bombing there were more people dying from radiation, scarcity of food, and overall horrible living conditions. John Hall on Daily Mail showed pictures of the aftermath of the bombings, and corpses lying in rubble, other people barely surviving.

Read More
10256 Words | 42 Pages

Introduction For decades there has been a great controversy as to whether or not the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were justified. It is often argued that these bombings were hideous atrocities the likes of which the world has never seen before, ones born of a nation’s thirst for vengeance and desire to exhibit its military and technological superiority. Some argue that though the bombings brought about the end to the Second World War, the deaths of more than two hundred thousand people cannot be a justifiable sacrifice. Others disagree completely and state that these deaths were a small price to pay to end the war that had ravaged millions more. And so, debates regarding this topic have flourished since those fateful days 70 years

Read More
1071 Words | 5 Pages

Though the consequences were immense, and many lives were lost, the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary in securing international peace, and an end to a war between Japan and

Read More
713 Words | 3 Pages

The decision to drop atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II is one of the most controversial and morally complex events in human history. On the 6 & 9 of August, 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on these two cities, resulting in the deaths of over 200,000 people that left many lasting scars on the collective morality of humanity. In this essay, I want to find out and examine the various factors and perspectives surrounding the decision, to see if the United States was justified in its use of the atomic weapons against Japan. To understand the decision to drop the atomic bombs, it is important to understand the events leading up to it. By mid-1945, World War II had been going on for over six years, resulting in millions of casualties, destruction and deaths.

Read More
851 Words | 4 Pages

The point of this investigation is to examine if America's choice to drop the atomic bombs on Japan, and more specifically Nagasaki, is justified or not. This examination will specifically cover the circumstances that carried the US into World War 2 and its associations with Japan amid the war before the atomic assault. This examination will likewise analyze the US's authorization of the bombs to be dropped over Japan. Content from an assortment of

Read More
1025 Words | 5 Pages

The bomb was dropped on two different cities in Japan 3 days apart. The events that took place those two days was something that had never happened before. History was made but not in a good way. The bombs destroyed many houses and people. The dropping of the atomic bomb affected the Japanese people negatively on a physical level and a psychological level.

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

Some people say the bombings were necessary to end the war quickly and surely. Others argue that it was unethical to the US to completely destroy a whole city filled with innocent people. This essay will discuss whether it was appropriate for the US to drop an atomic bomb on Japan given the conditions of World War II. The Americans and the Allied forces had already made Germany surrender in Europe and only Japan stood in the Allied forces’ way for peace.

Read More
1976 Words | 8 Pages

There are many differing opinions on the subject of whether the dropping of the atomic bombs was justified. One side, such as people in the US, argue that the dropping of the bombs were justified, as it allowed them to test the bomb and end the war quickly. However, another side which includes many people in Japan and pacifists, argues that the dropping of the bomb was not justified, as the effects of the bomb were too horrific. Even though this essay will be exploring both sides of the argument, the second atomic bomb should not have been dropped on Nagasaki.

Read More

More about Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified Dbq Research Paper

Open Document