ipl-logo

Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified Dbq Research Paper

709 Words3 Pages

After the atomic bombings, the immediate death toll was estimated to be around 140,000 in Hiroshima and 70,000 in Nagasaki. During World War II, the Pacific War was raging between Japan and the Allied forces, led by the United States. The strategy employed by the Allies was called "island hopping." It involved capturing key islands in the Pacific to establish airfields and secure supply lines. This allowed the Allies to gradually move closer to Japan. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were part of the effort to bring the war to a swift conclusion and prevent further loss of life. The dropping of the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justified. This claim can be supported by three reasons: Loss of innocent lives, Alternatives availability, and psychological …show more content…

(Document A, B) Finally, the dropping of the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justified when it came to psychological impact. This is exemplified by the text, “My private nurse set about examining my wounds without speaking a word. No one spoke... Why was everyone so quiet?...” This implies that the bombing was so horrible that it left survivors shocked and confused. According to the text, “Hiroshima is no longer a city but a burned-over prairie. To the east and to the west everything was flattened. In addition, this shows the overwhelming sense of loss and devastation Michihiko Hachiya and the survivors felt. This evidence shows that the dropping of the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justified because the atomic bombings had a devastating psychological impact on the survivors. (Document F) The immediate death toll in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was estimated to be around 140,000 and 70,000, respectively. That's a devastating loss of innocent lives. The bombings were a controversial part of World War

Show More
Related

Pros And Cons Of Truman And The Use Of Atomic Bombs

642 Words | 3 Pages

But he had no compelling reason to do so. The bomb provided a promising way to bring about a prompt Japanese surrender without the disadvantages of other alternatives, and in Truman’s mind, its use did not require a lengthy consideration” (Walker pg. 96). After the bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, people decided that the bombs were actually required. The people thought that if the bombs weren’t dropped, thousands of American lives would have died while America invaded Japan. The problem with this logic is that many people died in those bombings.

Read More

Prompt And Utter Destruction Summary

1394 Words | 6 Pages

Name: Course Instructor: Class: Date: Critical Book Review: Prompt and Utter Destruction Introduction Within weeks, word on the US dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki began to spread that the main reason behind the bombs was to save the lives of Americans (Bernard). It was put that hundreds of thousands of American military causalities were saved through the bombings.

Read More

Was Hiroshima Justified Dbq Essay

697 Words | 3 Pages

Kids and others frightened at the sights they saw when the blackness rose, skin burned off, people holding an organ, and many other frightening things. Was the dropping the bomb in both Hiroshima and Nagasaki justified? Do others believe it was a good idea? The correct answer is we don’t know. Just like many other political statements, millions disagree on this topic.

Read More

Hiroshima And Nagasaki Dbq Analysis

162 Words | 1 Pages

There is ample evidence to support the position that the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary in the surrender of Japan. It is seen that President Harry S. Truman had three reasons to proceed with the bombing. First, he assumed that the bomb would bring an end to the war. Second, Truman believed that the bomb would keep the USSR out of Asia. Lastly, he thought that dropping the bombs would be a way to test America’s new technology and observe the effects footnote 1.

Read More

Three Narratives Of Our Humanity By John W.

1403 Words | 6 Pages

The use of the atomic bomb when strategically compared to a land invasion, in fact prevented the loss of any U.S. soldiers lives, as well as the death of many Japanese citizens. Excerpts from “Three Narratives of our Humanity” by John W, debates whether or not the nuclear bombing was necessary to shock the Japanese into surrender and describes how the Japanese recall the war through a lens of their own victimization. An excerpt claims, “it is argued that the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima was necessary to shock the Japanese to surrender”. This presents a compelling argument supporting the ethicality of the bombings through its logical and strategic worth.

Read More

How Is Hiroshima Bombing Justified

1232 Words | 5 Pages

It also had long lasting effects that still impact Japanese lives. In the newspaper by Jack Doherty headlined ¨Atomic Bomb Fury Hits Japan¨ after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the president said, ¨It was to spare the Japanese people from utter destruction.¨ Yet, look where it has gone and how much damage it had cost Japan. I encourage you to not listen to these statements as if they were true, and right the wrongs the atomic bombs have done to Japan by unjustifying the act and telling others to do so as

Read More

Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified Dbq

513 Words | 3 Pages

It was a calm August morning in the year 1945, and citizens were out living their lives as normal, getting groceries, playing at the park, and walking to work, little did everyone in what was the beautiful town of Hiroshima know, there was an atomic bomb right above their heads. Boom. Simultaneously 70,000 innocent lives were lost. 30,000 more lives were taken later on due to the atomic bomb. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the two Japanese cities that the United dropped the Atomic Bomb on in 1945 to try & bring an end to World War 2.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

10256 Words | 42 Pages

Introduction For decades there has been a great controversy as to whether or not the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were justified. It is often argued that these bombings were hideous atrocities the likes of which the world has never seen before, ones born of a nation’s thirst for vengeance and desire to exhibit its military and technological superiority. Some argue that though the bombings brought about the end to the Second World War, the deaths of more than two hundred thousand people cannot be a justifiable sacrifice. Others disagree completely and state that these deaths were a small price to pay to end the war that had ravaged millions more. And so, debates regarding this topic have flourished since those fateful days 70 years

Read More

Nanking Massacre Dbq

1071 Words | 5 Pages

Though the consequences were immense, and many lives were lost, the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary in securing international peace, and an end to a war between Japan and

Read More

When Was The Use Of The Atomic Bomb Justified

713 Words | 3 Pages

The decision to drop atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II is one of the most controversial and morally complex events in human history. On the 6 & 9 of August, 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on these two cities, resulting in the deaths of over 200,000 people that left many lasting scars on the collective morality of humanity. In this essay, I want to find out and examine the various factors and perspectives surrounding the decision, to see if the United States was justified in its use of the atomic weapons against Japan. To understand the decision to drop the atomic bombs, it is important to understand the events leading up to it. By mid-1945, World War II had been going on for over six years, resulting in millions of casualties, destruction and deaths.

Read More

Nagasaki Justified Essay

851 Words | 4 Pages

The point of this investigation is to examine if America's choice to drop the atomic bombs on Japan, and more specifically Nagasaki, is justified or not. This examination will specifically cover the circumstances that carried the US into World War 2 and its associations with Japan amid the war before the atomic assault. This examination will likewise analyze the US's authorization of the bombs to be dropped over Japan. Content from an assortment of

Read More

How Does The Atomic Bomb Affect Society

1025 Words | 5 Pages

The bomb affected people negatively psychologically because it caused a multitude of mental health issues. The article “Psychological Fallout of Atomic Bomb in Nagasaki” states, “Distress was most strongly related to social activity - apathy, disrupted personal relationships, loss of pleasantness of living - suggesting that witnessing the bombing continues to have an impact on the daily lives of survivors even half a century later. ” This quote explains how not only does the bombing affected the daily lives of those back in the day but it also affects people who are still alive to this day. They experience a struggle a lot of people do not know of. They struggle socially because of the way the bombing affected their mental health.

Read More

Persuasive Essay On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

965 Words | 4 Pages

Since the Japanese were willing to inflict the most harm possible, the war may have lasted several more years. By 1945, those involved in the war were shattered. Therefore, the use of the atomic bombs was justified because it put an end to an already horrific

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Hiroshima

742 Words | 3 Pages

Some people say the bombings were necessary to end the war quickly and surely. Others argue that it was unethical to the US to completely destroy a whole city filled with innocent people. This essay will discuss whether it was appropriate for the US to drop an atomic bomb on Japan given the conditions of World War II. The Americans and the Allied forces had already made Germany surrender in Europe and only Japan stood in the Allied forces’ way for peace.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Justified

1976 Words | 8 Pages

There are many differing opinions on the subject of whether the dropping of the atomic bombs was justified. One side, such as people in the US, argue that the dropping of the bombs were justified, as it allowed them to test the bomb and end the war quickly. However, another side which includes many people in Japan and pacifists, argues that the dropping of the bomb was not justified, as the effects of the bomb were too horrific. Even though this essay will be exploring both sides of the argument, the second atomic bomb should not have been dropped on Nagasaki.

Read More

More about Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified Dbq Research Paper

Open Document