ipl-logo

Hobbes Leviathan Chapter 17 Analysis

492 Words2 Pages

In Hobbe’s Leviathan chapter seventeen: “Of the Causes, Generation, and Definition of a Common-wealth” depicts covenants. The passage comes from the subsection “Which Is Not to be had from the Law of Nature” wherein it focuses on the conception of preservation within the human nature. Hobbes justifies society's acceptance of moral laws because they promote self-preservation when enforced by an absolute monarch. First and foremost, the passage emphasizes the law of nature; which relates to the theory that one does not voluntarily conduct themselves in a way that is destructive to their own life. In other words, the law of nature inherently binds you to act safely because the law is a constraint that assumes one has a fundamental self-interest …show more content…

People hold a natural desire for liberty and dominion over other individuals. Specifically, humankind wants the power of doing according to their choice; while being in control of others to avoid the possibility of others determining their livelihood because Hobbes believes humankind falls into the tendency of carrying inherent distrust of others. Thus, covenants are created to implement the desire of liberty and dominion over other into actuality. The covenants want people to desire the same things freely, but for the community to work, it must be in the context in which the people share similar desires to create a community interest. However, the covenants must enable a mutual restriction of freedom among the people in hopes to maintain peace. Hobbes, accordingly, states “covenants without the sword are but words and of no strength to secure a man at all.” He means that without the Sword peace will not occur. Someone- particularly the third party- must interfere with the covenants to enforce the laws and keep the community

Show More
Related
216 Words | 1 Pages

In chapter 19 of Leviathan Thomas Hobbes discusses the different kinds of commonwealths and explains why he believes a monarchy is the best form of government. A few of the points he makes about why he believes this are: the monarchs interests are the same as the people, the monarch is more consistent than a democracy, and monarchy is more stable because the monarch can set up arrangements for the succession of power. In my opinion, these points (and the other points he makes) would only work if the people are lucky enough to have the right person as their sovereign. Monarchs in the past haven't always had the same interests as their people, they are just as likely to do things that hurt their people such as the events that lead to the French

Read More
1602 Words | 7 Pages

In the condition of nature, where man is put at war against man, no security is conceivable and life is brimming with terror. In any case, two common interests empower individuals to get away from the condition of nature; Hobbes’ refers to them as trepidation and reason (pg.108). Angst makes man need to get away from the condition of nature; logic demonstrates to him a method to get away. Reason gives the laws that Hobbes creates, which constitute the establishment for peace.

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

He believed that people formed an agreement between each other and the government, in which they gave up some rights, so that they could live in a safe and orderly way. In his book “Leviathan”, Hobbes says, “…that a man be willing, when others are so too, as far forth as for peace and defence of himself he shall think it necessary, to lay down this right to all things;” This states that man is willing to give up some rights to live in a safe society. I think that this concept of the social contract can be related to the British monarchy. The colonists gave up some of their rights to the King, so as to have order and structure in their

Read More
624 Words | 3 Pages

Hobbes believed that natural state of humans was violent and therefore needed order and control to ensure a just and equal society (Robinson 2016, 4). However Hobbes believed that a sovereign could maintain power without deceit and manipulation. Hobbes believed in the social contract which is when people could have a moral understanding about right and wrong to avoid the chaotic violent human nature. Hobbes believed in the idea of utilitarianism which would “maximize the most good and minimize the pain” (Robinson 201, 4). This would ensure that the sovereign was doing things for the right reasons and not to better himself but to better society as a

Read More
531 Words | 3 Pages

Alexus Quillin Over the course of centuries, the United States of America has had a variety of different Presidents, senators, and other government officials. Though no two government officials were exactly alike, one similarity that just about every one of them has had is some degree of wealth. Part of this is because in order to be put into the position to hold some form of rule or governing a person must hold some form of a campaign and convince the public that they are fit to rule. Such campaigns require a lot money and on average most people strongly interested in working in the government either need the education to do so or the money to campaign. Ironically, these businessmen, millionaires, and billionaires ultimately end up having to win the support of the non-rich which make up majority of the world.

Read More
2248 Words | 9 Pages

They are so self-interest that they could harm other people up to the extend of killing each other. Therefore, social contract was introduced in order for men to escape the state of nature and unites as a civil society. Hobbes argues that since men are naturally self-interested, yet rational, they will submit themselves to the Sovereign’s authority in order to be able to live in an organized and peaceful society (Hobbes, 1651). Hobbes believes that society become possible because there is a superior and powerful person to force men to

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

Hobbes law of nature states that each individual has the right to preserve his or her own life from any threats that might arise when interacting with other people, because when we are dealing with threats, we do not want to simply let the threats overtake and harm us. Consequently, Hobbes believed that there is a Right of Nature, which is the right to do things that are necessary in order to achieve the law of nature. To put it in different terms, we have the right to do what we have to in order to achieve the end goal of fully defending ourselves. Both the right of nature and the law of nature tie into individuals’ social contract because when individuals break their contract, it is likely that one of them will need to retaliate.

Read More
838 Words | 4 Pages

Summary Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) theory of social contract, which states that we need moral, legal rules because we want to escape the state of nature which is solitary, poor, brutal, nasty, and short. In this state, a man can kill others, and there are limited resources. This can soon lead to a state of war in which we are constantly disposed to harm others to achieve our goals. So, in this state of war if a person was to possess a beautiful house or property, and had all the comforts, luxuries, and amenities to lead a wonderful life; others could come and harm him and deprive him of his fruit of labor, life, and liberty. Therefore, the state of nature is that of fear, violence, and distrust.

Read More
1881 Words | 8 Pages

It is also important that there is a kind of reliance that the agreements will be kept. In chapter 17, Hobbes presents a solution for a commonwealth, where people in numbers consent to the single sovereign authority to have complete control over them by repressing some of the freedoms and enforce laws to safeguard order within a state. The Leviathan is described as a single body built up by components of citizens, constructed through agreement to surrender in obedience to this single authority, so as to flee from bringing destruction from one another. However the true liberties as outlined in chapter 21 of the Leviathan are not oppressive and establish the terms in which the authority is absolute only as it instructs its subjects in its proper use. (Carmichael,

Read More
1140 Words | 5 Pages

While Hobbes also states that the human nature does not allow for the people to live in peace and to pursue common goals since “here are very many that think themselves wiser and abler to govern the public better than the rest” (Hobbes 3). respectively, there always exists the notion of competition, and if there is no possibility to reach consensus over the issue, there is the need for establishing an authority. This is the reflection of the social contract idea in the work by Hobbes as far as the author is concerned that only through common action and goals the society is able to function without problems and conflicts. Nevertheless, even though, in contrast to Machiavelli, Hobbes suggests the way of getting power that is based on agreement rather than on power and intellectual games, their ideas regarding the need for a strong ruler who would be able to establish the order in the society is rather similar, even though in one case this task is taken by a person himself and in the other case delivered by the

Read More
578 Words | 3 Pages

According to Hobbes, in order to have a peaceful and cooperative society humans have to enter into an agreement.

Read More
432 Words | 2 Pages

In Leviathan, which was written during the English Civil Wars, Hobbes argues for the necessity and natural evolution of the social contract, a social construct in which individuals mutually unite into political societies, agreeing to abide by common rules and accept resultant duties to protect themselves and one another from whatever might come otherwise. He also advocated rule by an absolute sovereign, saying that “chaos; and other situations identified with a "state of nature" could be averted only by a strong central government, one with the power of the biblical Leviathan, which would protect people from their own selfishness. He also warned of "the war of all against all,” a motto that went on to greater fame and represented Hobbes ' view of humanity without government. After returning to England, Hobbes published two final works that completed the Elements of Philosophy. In modern society, Hobbes ' ideas are used to form the building blocks of nearly all Western political thought, including the right of the individual, the importance of republican government, and the idea that acts are allowed if they are not expressly forbidden.

Read More
1351 Words | 6 Pages

Hobbes holds that “it is impossible to subjugate a man without first having placed him in the position of being unable to do without another.” Thus, the lack of organizational interdependence in primitive society prevents inequality. Similarly, the lawlessness of early society makes conflict impossible: war “can exist neither in the state of nature, where there is no stable property.”

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

Charles Darwin was a naturalist in the 1800’s that went to Christ College to study natural history. He was accepted for the Naturalist position on the HMS Beagle and soon was on a 5-year voyage around the world. He had an amazing opportunity to collect many specimens for his scientific study, but one of the most important stops was in the Galapagos Archipelago. His findings led him to speculate and found the revolutionary theory of evolution. Natural Selection is a notable part of Evolution, which is a very well known theory that is excepted by many scientist as fact.

Read More
941 Words | 4 Pages

THOMAS HOBBES AND THE SOVEREIGN’S POWER In this essay, focusing on Thomas Hobbes’s book ‘’Leviathan’’, mainly on the chapters 13 and 14, I’m going to analyse the fact that Hobbes gives the sovereign an absolute power authorizing it to provide the society with security essential to their liberty. Thomas Hobbes is certainly one of the most controversial and frequently contested political philosophers of modern times; he left a significant mark on modern understanding of human nature, political theories and the issues of systems of governance. His work has been at the centre of many discussions among political philosophers; I will refer to some of the twentieth century political theorists and their critiques to confront Hobbes view of the absolute

Read More

More about Hobbes Leviathan Chapter 17 Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document