The result of the Russian Revolution was increased tension between the two groups. The Russian Revolution did nor affect the Canadian economy a lot, aside from creating tension between Russia and Canada because of their two clashing political
Similar to the Tsars before him, Stalin caused the death of anyone who opposed his way of ruling, especially the Kulaks. He violated the rights of the people by launching an extensive campaign on deporting ethnic groups that opposed his leadership. Stalin’s years of “great terror” through much unneeded purges caused him to more and more act as a “Red Tsar”. The only difference was Stalin was ruling under Marxist ideologies with communism being the end result as opposed to adherence to the Russian Orthodox Church. However, just like Stalin, Alexander II was very similar in that the secret police was at the centre of dealing with outside issues towards his power.
With no signs of the czar’s attempt to solve the complications, Russia banded together and filled the streets with strikes and riots. A revolution was peaking among the peasants. The uprising brought Nicholas ll no choice but to abdicate his throne. This was an opportunity
Alexander the Great was known as one of the greatest leaders in all the Ancient Western World but, there is a darker side to his legacy. Alexander the Great should not be notorious for being a great leader who spread greek culture throughout the ancient world but as the man who had an unbeatable military, killed innocent people and had a military strategy that was to destroy and obliterate. Alexander the Great had full control of anything he touched. He was one of the wealthiest people to ever live and abused his powers of being leader of at the time, one of the most powerful nations in the world. Overall, Alexander the great should not be held to the name Alexander the Great because it wasn’t his battle tactics and knowledge that lead him to never lose a battle but it was the sheer quantity and skill of his military that made them great.
Essentially, Alexander II made the point that the current political system of feudalism was heavily favoring the upper and middle classes, thus condemning the serfs to a life of misery and constant oppression from the state and their lords. The biggest reasoning behind him stating this, it to try and regain the support of his nation, while improving the economy. Alexander II realized that Russia was falling far behind in terms of industrialization compared to other European countries, so he wanted to roll in a new economic system that would not only pull in more income, but also better his image with the
Alexander the Great led an eventful and prosperous life, eliciting tremendous change across the globe. He built an incredible empire that spanned across Macedonia, Egypt, Greece and India, and contributed to the widespread use of Hellenistic culture. As well as bringing about massive political and socioecnomic change, transforming the world as we know it. To begin, one aspect of Alexander's legacy that I believe to be significant is the long-term political and socioeconomic impact he had on the world. Alexander helped create a new era in history known as The Hellenistic Age and brought about many new developments in areas such as math, education, and architecture.
Victor A. Varela period 6 11/3/14 Historical Impact Throughout his life, Alexander conquered neighboring countries and showed his military and leadership skills in combat. His empire became the largest of its time period. Unfortunately, he died of illness at the young age of thirty-three, and he had no heir to his throne. However, his ambitious campaigns and conquests, his brave character, and his leadership and combat expertise helped him create a large impact on the world both back then and today.
While that could be seen as a rare event, later empires would show that this train of thought was effective. One such example being one of the most researched men in history, Alexander the Great. Alexander is known as the man who conquered the Achaemenid but the could not have done it and without using the same tactics as Cyrus which were outlined in the Cyrus Cylinder, mostly the use of religious tolerance. One example was taking the mantle of Pharaoh by Alexander rather than using a governor to do it for him. Furthermore, accepting his role in the Egyptian pantheon, claiming descent form the Egyptian god Amun.
Inbetween the years 1450-1750 CE, Western Europe and Russia have gone through several political and economic changes, though they have existed in different districts of Europe. Both Western European and Russian cultural patterns have been influenced by their enlightenment periods, bringing an era of revolution and economic/ intellectual advancement. However, though they shared this in common, Western Europe went through the Renaissance, a time of new styles and inventions in secular arts and sciences that challenged popular religion, while Russian was becoming a major European power through Westernization forces brought on by tsars, like Peter the Great. Many of Western Europe’s innovations in finance and government started developing during
Nicolas Kostelidis English 9 March 21, 2023 Mrs. Gage How did Alexander the Great influence history? Alexander the Great affected history by Unifying Greece, Defeating the Persian Empire and Asia, and influencing cultures. He played a huge part in today's world and he influenced lots of other empires. Alexander the Great was a very important person and he will always be remembered in history. Alexander the Great affected history by unifying Greece, defeating Persia and Asia, and influencing different cultures.
The video on YouTube by OgrnTv named “Engineering and Empire Greece Age of Alexander History Channel Documentary” describes the life of Alexander. Alexander was one of the history’s great commanders. He was well aware that he lived in ancient innovation, increase warfare. Alexander the Great employed the latest technology at that time to conquest civilizations. He transformed the lands from Egypt to India into a new Greek world.
In other parts of Europe there had been many peasant revolts and though they were quickly distinguished, they became an inspiration to other peasants. In fear of a rebellion, Tsar Alexander II used imperial power to free all serfs in Russia. Serfdom in Russia was also the scapegoat for many of the problems plaguing Russia at the time including food shortages, overpopulation, and the backwardness of Russia. After many debates among the government officials concerning what would be best for the serfs once they were freed, they came up with an agreement. Serfs were allowed land, but the wealthy landowners got the best picks and ex-sefs got the leftovers.
“Words - so innocent and powerless as they are, as standing in a dictionary, how potent for good and evil they become in the hands of one who knows how to combine them.” Nathaniel Hawthorne was one of the most important members of American Literature in the early to mid nineteenth century. Many of Hawthorne's works revolved around themes of sin, guilt, perseverance, and forgiveness. These values are rooted in Hawthorne's family, as his ancestors are puritans who played an important part in the Salem witch trials. Hawthorne's use of puritan values helped to develop the characters in his works in intricate ways.
RESPONSE PAPER ON ALEXANDER GERSCHENKRON ECONOMIC BACKWARDNESS IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE Response paper ALEXANDER GERSCHENKRON, ECONOMIC BACKWARDNESS IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE Introduction Gerschenkron in the Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective which focused on how relatively backward economies lagged the economic basics for industrialization. And set out the " Elements of backwardness" and "The States and The Banks; Social Attitudes, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Development", and summarized in "The Approach to European Industrialization”. Central idea of Gerschenkron The central idea of Gerschenkron is encouraging industrial growth.
The Russian Revolution, which was started by Lenin and his followers, was a rebellion that occurred in 1917 which forced higher powers to act to the needs of the lower class. For instance, many citizens were worried for their protection in consequence to the lack of survival necessities due to an early drought. Furthermore, their current czar during the time was incapable for his position as a czar and made horrendous decisions as czar. For example, when the czar, Nicholas, entered in World War I, he sent untrained troops into countless battles of failure which costed in mass amounts of lost life (paragraph 23).
