ipl-logo

How Did Andrew Jackson Disregarded A Key Section Of The Indian Removal Act

899 Words4 Pages

Andrew Jackson was President of the United States from 1829 to 1837. Some call his term a triumph and some a tragedy. A big part of his tragedy was the Indian Removal Act in 1830. Jackson wanted to remove the native tribes from lands in the eastern and southern United States (Stock). Jackson referred to the Native Americans as savages and supported Georgia’s efforts to seize Cherokee land and nullify the tribe’s laws (Foner). The main goal of Jacksons was to move the Native Americans out of their land to have that land and move them to western territories. He was forcing them out of their territory and stripping them of their legal rights (Stock). The removal of the tribes led to an event called the Trail of Tears. According to Foner, Federal …show more content…

Cave adds, “He failed to honor promises made in his name in order to win congressional support of the removal, and he broke a number of federal treaty commitments to Indians, including some that he had personally negotiated” (Cave). Jackson broke promises he made for his own personal benefit and disregarded the people involved. As mentioned earlier, the Supreme Court acknowledged and ruled in favor of the Cherokee stating that Indian tribes were domestic dependent nations. The Supreme Court also noted how they could conduct their own political processes and that they were afforded the protection of the federal government (McNeill). Everything was against what Jackson was trying to do to the tribes and not just morally, but they were supposed to be protected by the government. Jackson ultimately ended up disregarding the decision of the Supreme Court and continued to push Georgia’s efforts to make the Indians leave. Andrew Jackson was viewed as the “people’s president” because he welcomed all citizens into the political process and respected and wanted to address what the common people wanted (McNeill). If this was the case, why did he allow such a tragedy to happen, and disregard the history that was in place? He wasn’t listening to what the tribes wanted and how it would affect

Show More
Related
170 Words | 1 Pages

The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Indians land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their land in the states, but could not force them to leave. He violated and broke commitments that he even negotiated with them. He tried to bribe the Indians and even threatened some of them. Alfred Cave organizes his article thematically and is trying to prove

Read More
184 Words | 1 Pages

If he was really trying to help the Indians get their land back he would have not agreed that remcoing them benefits the Americans. In the treaty of New Echota it states.” That a sum not exceeding five million dollars be paid to the Cherokee Indians for all their land and possessions.” (Treaty of New Echota). Andrew Jackson also signed the New Echota Treaty so he wanted the removal

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

Apparently Jackson did not even trouble himself with the question. Upon issuing the Indian Removal Act, Jacksonian Democrats failed to protect the Constitution. Because of the Indian Removal Act, Andrew Jackson violated the Constitution yet again. Andrew Jackson ignored John Marshal and the Supreme Court’s ruling that Georgia’s extension of state law over the Cherokee land was unconstitutional. Politically, Jackson’s domestic policy was focused on building a better government for the common people.

Read More
846 Words | 4 Pages

President Jackson promised the Indians horses and shelter but he did not give them anything. Indian removal act was not justified because President Jackson was not being a good leader, they Cherokee Indians were there first and claimed their land before the white settlers came, lastly the Indian Removal was very cruel and

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

But this time according to the appeal on the Law made in 1830 which prohibited whites from living on Indian territory after March 31, 1831, without a license from that state. So when with the Supreme Court they decided that the Cherokee did not have a right to keep and have their own government in their land, the Georgia extensions of the state's law to be agents the law. From the Indian Removal Act you can see that Andrew Jackson different Values and beliefs than the CHerokees. Andrew Jackson valued American Progress and expansion, because he wanted and continuously was trying to remove the indians out of their land because he believed that they were obstacles to the american progress.

Read More
575 Words | 3 Pages

Jackson wanted his country to have more land, which is a good thing. However, the Indians were unfamiliar with the land that they were forced to move to. They wanted to stay on “the land of their fathers.” This was shown in the Indian removal document 2. They had to leave their homes, their farms, their streams, and their forests.

Read More
289 Words | 2 Pages

He sent them off to their relocated places. He sent the Native Americans in carts and took their children away from them. Andrew Jackson was a villain for the Indian Removal Act. By relocating the Native Americans to an Indian Territory in Oklahoma. More than 4,000 Native Americans died.

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

He viewed the Native Americans as, “ conquered subjects who live within the borders of the United States”. Jackson wanted Congress to pass the law, making the Native Americans move west, and eventually in 1830 they passed the Indian Removal Act. Some tribes banded together to stand up to them, but failed, were sent away to the Indian territory, and most died during the journey.(Creating America A History of the United States). Andrew Jackson messed up the economy with the war against the bank. He claimed he didn’t like the bank, and this became an issue, “ Jackson’s war on the bank became the main issue,[..]” .

Read More
147 Words | 1 Pages

The Indian Removal Act was a deal, which made the president, Andrew Jackson, of The Unites States authorised to resettle the Indian tribes who lived in the eastern parts of Mississippi. The deal was signed in 1829 and took effect in 1830. The main reason for why Jackson signed the deal was plain and simple. The American soldiers found huge amounts of gold in the areas of the Natives, and they wanted the Natives removed so that they could dig and search for more. A few of the tribes decided to leave peacefully, while others tried to resist Andrews unfair policy.

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

Andrew Jackson’s sentiment towards the Native Americans was certainly not a kind one. Manifest destiny was a popular belief among Americans, including Jackson, and he would go to the extent of forcing Native Americans out of their homes to reach their “ordained goal”. He believed in the expansion of southern slavery which is why he pushed for removing the Indians west of the Mississippi, which makes it the more disgraceful. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 said that it will allow American government to offer in-state territories to the Indian’s for their western land. This wasn’t the case when the U.S. went in and drove the Indians out by force.

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

Although Jackson was important, he was part of many terrible things. Around the 1820s there were many major indian tribes in eastern United States such as Cherokee, Chickasaw, Creek and Seminole. This soon came to a change. Andrew Jackson thought these Indians were in the way of eastern development, using the Indian Removal Act which the congress had approved he decided to kick them out and send them west. In 1831 the Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Indians had the right to self government and the United States could not interfere with that.

Read More
552 Words | 3 Pages

In 1824, he ran for president but lost when the House of Representatives voted for John Adams. The “Corrupt Bargain, “as Jackson’s supporters called it and he had the backing of the citizens, he ran and won against John Adams in 1828. One of the major topics of his agenda was to remove all Native American, especially the Cherokee, out of the east and move them to the west. The purpose was to open up new Indian land for white settlers and cared less who he was

Read More
359 Words | 2 Pages

One of the most significant criticisms of Andrew Jackson's and his treatment of the Native americans. Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which forced thousands of Native Americans from their industrial lands in the Southeast to reserve in Oklahoma. This act

Read More
265 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Jackson disobeyed a direct order from the Supreme Court, which it means he was above the law. I really wonder how Americans tolerated him, at that time, he was cruel to the Indian common man. Because of him, the Native Americans have the worst end of the Trail of Tears. They are the ones who are forced out of their traditional homes and sent away on a journey of pain and death. Those who had fallen ill, most of the time died, and those who had the will to move on were able to make it to the end and start new lives.

Read More
660 Words | 3 Pages

He saw the policy of Indian removal as necessary to promote American economic growth and security. Jackson's attitude towards Native Americans was controversial, and he was known for his harsh policies towards them. He believed that they were inferior to whites and viewed their assimilation into American society as impossible. He famously defied a Supreme Court ruling that favored the Cherokee Nation's right to remain on their lands in Georgia and pushed forward with their forced removal. Jackson's role in the Indian Removal and his attitudes towards Native Americans have been the subject of ongoing debate and criticism by historians and scholars, with some viewing him as a champion of American democracy and others as a symbol of America's treatment of Native Americans.

Read More

More about How Did Andrew Jackson Disregarded A Key Section Of The Indian Removal Act

Related Topics

Open Document