Andrew Johnson was the first president in U.S. history to be impeached. He was a disliked by many people in the north because he favored the south and because of his pro-slavery views. After the Civil War, Johnson was stubbornly against any laws that would aid the slaves in any way or any laws that would penalize men that fought for the confederacy. Johnson didn’t get along very good with the congress. He vetoed many bills that the congress tried to pass.
Abraham Lincoln was assassinated in April of 1865, this caused friction over the post war reconstruction policy and led to a disagreement between the next President Andrew Johnson and Congress. Reconstruction Era led by Andrew JohnsonIn 1864, Abraham Lincoln selected Andrew Johnson as his Vice-President. Andrew Johnson was a Democratic senator from Tennessee. Lincoln was looking for Southern support and hoped that by making Johnson the Vice-President, it would have some appeal to Southerners who did not want to leave the Union. After Lincoln’s assassination, Johnson’s plans raised questions.
Abraham Lincoln’s vs Andrew Johnson’s Reconstruction Plan Lincoln shared the uncommon belief that the confederate states could still be part of the union and that the cause of the rebellion was only a few within the states which lead him to begin the reconstruction in December of 1863. This resulted in plans with lenient guidelines and although they were challenged by Wade-Davis Bill, Lincoln still rejected his ideas and kept his policies in place. Lincoln also allowed land to be given the newly freed slave or homeless white by distributing the land that had been confiscated from former land owners however this fell through once Johnson took office. After Lincoln’s death when Johnson was elected many things started to turn away from giving blacks equal rights and resulted in many things such a black codes which kept newly freed slaves from having the same rights as whites. When Lincoln first acted after the civil war, he offered policies that would allow the confederate slaves to become part of the union again and would allow a pardon for those states.
With the assassination of president Lincoln, Andrew Johnson, a Southern democrat, came into office. Despite being staunchly pro-Union and anti-secession, Johnson's approach to reconstruction seemed far less attractive, perhaps due to the fact that he was a slave owner. Following Johnson's entrance, moderates and radicals formed an alliance for arguably two decisive reasons: both groups shared a parallel distrust and disliking for Johnson, and Johnson's measures seemed far too sparing in his efforts of reconciliation with Southern states. Moreover, during Johnson's presidency, Northerners recognized a South that had once again become unruly, which many believed was a result of the lenient tendencies that Johnson approached reconstruction with.
Johnson, a southern Democrat who supported the Union, had been chosen as a running mate by Lincoln in 1860 to try and appease both sides of the slavery debate. Johnson had been a tailor by trade prior to entering politics and had none of Lincoln’s skills as orator or negotiator. From the state of Tennessee, he had sympathy for the South and supported Lincoln’s plan of “restoration.” After Lincoln’s death, Johnson implemented his own plan, based loosely on the desires of Lincoln to shepherd the South back into the Union, but with several distinct changes. Johnson chose not to allow military nor civil leaders of the Confederacy to participate in the new government.
Andrew Johnson had only been vice-president for 42 days when he became president. He seemed supportive of the penal measures against the Confederates in the past, believing that they were to blame for the Civil War. However, Johnson was even more lenient to the Confederates even pardoning leaders and members. He was constantly clashing with the Radicals in the Congress solely on the status of the freed slaves and whites in the South. Many former Confederates were in denial to accepting both social changes and political domination by former slaves.
Andrew Johnson was another individual involved in the reconstruction. Johnson allowed the Southern states to reconstruct themselves (TCI 23). By observing this evidence, it is clear that he was not promoting the reconstruction. He had a different mindset than Lincoln. He wanted to permit and obstruct any rights that Blacks had.
After the Civil War the era of the Reconstruction began with the 13th Amendment which President Abraham Lincoln's announced as the Emancipation Proclamation in 1883. The 13th Amendment was a huge deal because it eliminated slavery and obligatory servitude. After Lincoln's assassination in April 1865 his successor Andrew Johnson became the 17th president. He also was the first president to be impeached, but he was not removed from office he only served one term from 1808-1875. Despite the initiation of the reconstruction president Andrew Johnson was not a supporter of the Republican Party which most of them come from the northern states.
Lincoln’s successor was his vice president Andrew Johnson. Some have tried to argue that Andrew Johnson’s plans for reconstruction would have been what Lincoln himself was going to do, but this cannot be further from the truth. Lincoln showed some of his intentions with his decision to revoke the invitation to state legislature of Virginia to meet and officially remove Virginia from the confederacy, and in his last public speech he openly advocated for limed black suffrage. Johnson on the other hand had a very different vision of reconstruction and black suffrage.
Andrew Johnson, the 17th President of the United States, was brought up on impeachment charges in 1868 for multiple reasons. One of the reasons was that he vetoed 20 congressional bills. He also Failed to consult congress at the start of reconstruction. But the biggest charge was that he violated the Tenure act because he removed Edwin M. Stanton from the cabinet without the permission of Senate. Johnson's action was seen as an abuse of power and an attempt to undermine the authority of Congress.
Why do most stories have characters with similar traits? Most novels or any type of story, they have different archetypal characters. In the novel “The Hobbit” by J.R.R Tolkien the three characters Bilbo Baggins, Gandalf the wizard, and Smaug the destroyer, they are all archetypal characters. Throughout the story Bilbo goes on an adventure to defeat smaug. Bilbo eventually defeats smaug and returns what he finds.
President Johnson was a man that was highly against antislavery in the eighteen hundreds. He had fought desperately against Congress concerning the freedom of slaves. His views on this issue however almost cost him his job except he had prepared for the worse and had
Andrew Johnson born on December 29, 1808, in Raleigh, North Carolina. He became the 17th president shortly after Abraham Lincoln's death in 1865. He was Abraham Lincoln’s Vice President and was automatically moved to the Presidency, although never officially elected. His Reconstruction arrangements, indulgent and biased toward the South and his vetoing of the Reconstruction Acts disenthralled the Radical Republicans in Congress. His governing prompted the political destruction and denunciation of his leadership.
During his time of being the President, Johnson accomplished a few important things in American History. Johnson was very focused on restoring the Union. He tried to follow through with Lincoln’s plan for the slaves and granted them second class citizenship. Johnson said that Reconstruction was over and the goals for the Union had been accomplished, as well for the ex-slaves. While he was president the 13th amendment and 14th amendment was passed and ratified to the Constitution.
Meanwhile, the struggle between Johnson and Congress came about, which led to his impeachment in 1868. Reconstruction failed to improve the South economically because European nations no longer depended on the South for cotton since they had important colonies in Egypt, which produced cheaper cotton. Additionally, reconstruction also failed due to "carpetbaggers" from the North because they took advantage of the devastated South both politically and financially. Since participation to hold public office was not permitted to any Southerners, the Northerners placed men in office that could be manipulated by them. Reconstruction can be considered a large failure because of resentment in the South and it seems as if they felt like they were being punished for losing the war.
