ipl-logo

How Did Geography Affect The Byzantine Empires

600 Words3 Pages

Geography plays an important role in configuring the power, longevity, and operation of an empire. In 395 CE, the Roman empire was divided into the Eastern (Byzantine) and Western Roman Empires, each with their own respective geographical characteristics.

These differences manifested in both physical geography and human (political) geography. These geographic differences both benefitted and hindered the two Roman Empires. Primarily, geography hindered the Byzantines because of their lack of protective terrain and aquatic features, the centrality of Constantinople, and close proximity to other groups and empires.

Both had their own strengths and pitfalls, but one could argue the Byzantine Empire had more physical geographical disadvantages …show more content…

Conversely, the Eastern Empire was less susceptible to naval attacks than their counterparts because of their more inland position, and more susceptible to land attacks because of their proximity to other cultures and civilizations of north Africa and western Asia. Unfortunately for the Byzantines, land attacks occurred more frequently during this time period.

One might also argue that the Byzantine Empire had more human (political) geographical disadvantages than the Western Empire. They were surrounded by many other settlements and empires, including the Ethiopian Empire, Kyvian Rus Empire, the Huns, the Vandals, the Ottomans, the Ostrogoths and Visigoths. Their lack of protection from physical geographic features allowed for these groups to easily orchestrate attacks.

Additionally, their most powerful and prosperous city, Constantinople, was located in a very central position. It was centrally located along the Mediterranean Sea, situated on the northern African coast. This meant it was more susceptible to invasions from northern African Empires and groups via land, and invasions from western European Empires/groups via sea. Furthermore, geographically the Byzantines were slightly more dispersed than the Romans in terms of population concentration. This meant they were weaker defensively, with most of their population in or near

Show More
Related
2010 Words | 9 Pages

Soon after this they switched to greek as the official language and supporting greek studies. The downfall of the byzantine empire is solely because of the involvement in the Crusades, also known as the holy war. This holy war was against the Turks mounted in central Asia, however, the Pope had started the Crusade even though politically they should have not created them. The first crusade was a mild success with Alexios asking Pope Urban II for help to expand eastward to stifle the muslim rule. Of course Urban had seen this as a two birds with one stone kind of deal by knocking out

Read More
1464 Words | 6 Pages

The history of the Byzantine Empire and Western Europe were different during the third wave civilizations. The way they were different is that by the Byzantine Empire had a different form of political government were at the western Europe government all collapsed in the fifth century. The Byzantine empire also had a greater control over their churches and their long-distance trade networks. There were many trajectories

Read More
773 Words | 4 Pages

This gave the invaders a high success rate, leading Rome into a state of heavy destruction, to the point where Rome could no longer return to its once prosperous state. As a result of many expansions and conquests, Rome gained a plentiful amount of land, stretching from the Mediterranean Sea to western Asia, even owning the northern tip of Africa. It was impossible to maintain peace through one ruler in such a big territory, so “the throne of Constantinople was erected in the East while the West was still possessed by a series of emperors” (Doc. 8). The syllable of the

Read More
608 Words | 3 Pages

Each patriarch lived in a different part of the Byzantine Empire; Alexandria, Jerusalem, Antioch, Constantinople, and Rome. “Constantinople was a city where people of every religion lived next to one another, living in their own quarters and social structures.” Paragraph 18, Macedonian Dynasty Source #2: "10 Interesting Facts About The Byzantine Empire - Listverse." Listverse. Theodoros ||, 19 Apr. 2013.

Read More
621 Words | 3 Pages

After the Roman Empire had fallen, the region had split into two areas: the West just being Western Europe, and the East officially becoming the Byzantine Empire. Although Western Europe and Byzantine were similar in the way the populations of both regions had retained the similar daily lifestyles and material culture of the fallen Roman Empire, they had developed drastic contrasts over time; they differed in how each of their regions were politically organized, and each had their own dominant belief system. Even after the split of Rome, the regions were similar in the way that both of their populations had become so accustomed to the previous empire’s lifestyle and material culture, that it had not faded as time gradually passed into the Middle Ages. Farming continued to be a stable source of food for both Western Europe and Byzantine, the area and condition being able to supply beans during the spring, and wheat during the fall season. The preference of agriculture comes from the Byzantine Empire being wealthy

Read More
532 Words | 3 Pages

In holding off the various attacks, the Byzantines kept Western Civilization Christian instead of it being converted to Muslim. The Christian Church of Constantinople and the Christian Church of Rome also split due to an argument over some spiritual interpretations of the Bible. If it was not for the Byzantines most of Western Civilization would be Muslim and not Christian.

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

In other words we also could say that because of fight inside of byzantine empire they wasn't able to survive from other attacks. In response to this argument I would like to argue back still it is worth because there isn't any history source we can’t learn. Which means that we could at least learn that we shouldn't fight inside because normally country falls because of split from inside. In conclusion, Byzantine empire should be studied by Schools because it is worth to study.

Read More
1250 Words | 5 Pages

However, in Constantinople the church was controlled by the state, while in Xi’an it was not. The role of the state in the Constantinople was similar to in Xi’an because both highly promoted militaristic values. In Constantinople, rulers insisted upon having a huge standing army and giant walls surrounding the city. This proves that they wanted their state to be powerful, and strong enough to defeat neighbors at any moment. The state also payed for the construction of massive hippodromes, for chariot races.

Read More
1239 Words | 5 Pages

The geography of empires and kingdoms such as the Phoenicians and the Persians has affected their establishment and success. Paragraph 2: In Egypt and Mesopotamia, geography is a big part of how civilizations were created. Egypt naturally has boundaries which makes it a good place for a civilization. Egypt’s boundaries include the Nile, Sahara desert, red sea, and mediterranean sea.

Read More
1738 Words | 7 Pages

The Eastern Empire was governed in Byzantium known as the Byzantine Empire and the Western Empire was governed in Rome known as the Holy Roman Empire. In Lost to the West, Lars develops two thesis statements throughout the book. The first thesis is how the Byzantine Empire saved western civilization from invaders and other tribes that try to take over Europe. In the book it says “ Western civilization, however, owes an incalculable debt to the scorned city on the Bosporus. For more than a millennium, its capital stood, the great bastion of the East protecting a nascent, chaotic Europe, as one after another would-be world conqueror foundered against its walls”

Read More
924 Words | 4 Pages

Additionally they expanded their seafaring network south and attacked the Byzantine

Read More
121 Words | 1 Pages

Both empires’ economies were very different. The Byzantine became one of the wealthiest empires ever, while the Western economy was an agricultural based with little trading with

Read More
879 Words | 4 Pages

Some historians claim that there are as many as a hundred political and non-political interweaving reasons that led to the collapse of Roman Empire. One of the important political causes is the division of the Empire into two empires, the west (Latin) and the eastern (Greek, later known as the Byzantine empire) in 284 A.D. by Diocletian. This division was adopted to protect the over-expanding empire and to defend its borders against the Barbarian attacks. This was achieved initially as the two empires synchronized responsibilities and strengthened each.

Read More
1126 Words | 5 Pages

For example, if an invasion was occurring in Egypt. But the bulk of their armies were stationed in the city of Rome the general could load them into ships and send them by sea which is much faster than traveling by foot which any land-locked countries like Mongolia would have to do. Fully surrounding the Meditteranean was also very useful in creating trade routes between major cities throughout the empire. Eventually, the empire grew so big that it had to be split in two, the Western Roman Empire being controlled by Rome, and the Eastern by Constantinople.

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

How did geography effect in Greek history? Or in other words what effects did geography have on Ancient Greece positive and negative? Well you could start by saying how the mountains served as natural barriers and divided ancient Greece. The mountains in Ancient Greece had a lot to do with some negative and also positive effects on Greece.

Read More

More about How Did Geography Affect The Byzantine Empires

Related Topics

Open Document