Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Coming of age in popular literature
Coming of age in popular literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Coming of age in popular literature
Coming of age in popular literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Coming of age in popular literature
George did the right thing by killing lennie. He was gonna get killed either way either the law or curly so it was better just to kill him there. Lennie was in danger and endangered others. So yes george did do the right thing by killing lennie and not making him suffer.
He didn’t want to do that to Lennie but he did to make some things better. One reason George should be justified is because he never killed George out of hate, just after this time Lennie now killing Curleys wife although it was accident
Another reason Lennie should not have been killed for what he did was because Lennie doesn't know his own strength. George should not have killed Lennie because he should of taught him that he is stronger, when the first accident happened in Weed. George should have taught Lennie how to control himself when he was little.
Another reason is the ranchers would’ve killed him no matter what so this way George ensured it was fast and painless. On the other hand, this was condemned because George had been saying how his life would be so much better without Lennie and this allowed him to be able to live that life. George's decision to kill Lennie was justified because Lennie was going to be killed no matter what. After all of the ranchers find out that Lennie killed Curley’s wife, Curley states that he is going to kill Lennie, "I'm gonna get him.
The selfless, painful decision george made was unfortunately the right one. This is displayed through many pieces of evidence (majority of which is just action made out of temptation) found in John Steinbeck's novel, Of Mice and Men. This story takes place on a secluded ranch in Soledad California in the midst of the Great Depression, where many people were forced to live isolated lives while chasing low paying jobs throughout the country. One reason that George made the right decision by ending Lennie’s life is, if he had not done so, Curley or one of the other men would have shot him, leaving him to die a slow and painful death. In addition, George allowed Lennie to die happily.
George went ahead of them and talked to Lennie about their dream ranch and killed him by shooting him in the back of the head so his last few moments would be peaceful and happy. I think he made the right decision because Lennie otherwise would’ve been afraid in his last moments, George didn’t have to deal with the fact that someone else killed Lennie, and Lennie was dangerous to himself and to others. I don’t think I could kill my friend but, I think it was good that George did because he gave Lennie those last few moments in color. He was happy thinking about tending the rabbits on their dream ranch.
The main reason George killed Lennie is because Lennie would have killed somebody again. And the evidence is clearly there, the pet mice that he killed, the poor puppy that he accidently hit to hard, and especially Curley’s wife. He almost killed the girl in weed if he had gone any further. The sad thing is is that he doesn't know how strong he really is, nor does he know what he’s done wrong in the first place.
Although the action of George shooting Lennie in the back of the head in the novel “Of Mice and Men,” is absolutely heart wrenching, I completely support George’s decision and action, for he was providing protection for Lennie, himself and others. First of all, throughout the novel we notice that Lennie’s violent behaviour had been escalating higher and higher, eventually reaching the point where he killed a woman. It started simply with killing mice, then crushing Curley’s hand, then killing a puppy, and finally rose to the extreme point in which he murdered a human being. If somehow George had escaped with Lennie instead of choosing to end Lennie’s life, knowing that this pattern of violence would continue, it is probable that he could
When Lennies aunt died, George stuck with lennie forming the their rare friendship. He makes many unintended mistakes but is very nice and warm hearted man. Georges actions to Lennie are not justified because no one should ever kill their best friend, they had a chance to escape together, and Lennie may have gotten a consequence that was suitable. George shooting Lennie is not justifiable because Lennie & George have been traveling together for years despite the small incident in Weed.
He was also human! Killing another human is never right. I do understand that george was trying to protect lennie but killing him is certainly not the right way to do it. Lennie may have problems with accidentally killing things but george didn't have to kill him for it. George promised to protect lennie and by killing him George broke that promise.
It is clear that George did not have the right to end Lennie 's life in such a selfish way. George always talks to Lennie about how fabulous they are when they are together at their own ranch and from day to day I end up with their life in a very cruel way. In conclusion, it can be said that George 's reasons for ending George 's life were enough to do so since Lennie was a very dependent person and could not stand alone. George tried to help him at all times as far as he could, but still Lennie was still in serious trouble, that 's precisely the reason why George wanted to prevent Lennie suffering in the future because he realized that he could not live alone.
Some people might think in the opposite side that George should not killed Lennie because Lennie did not mean to anything. He has done it without knowing how strong of himself. Lennie made many troubles this might be because of his disability, but this is the reason that he deserves to live. He has done many thing that make George get into trouble and It is better if Lennie has to die because of George shoot him not the other. "All the time he coulda had such a good time if it was not for you” (Steinbeck).
Lennie with his simple mind, always gets into trouble. This time, Lennie gets himself in a bind once again, that George can’t save him from. George decision to kill Lennie in the story, was due to his responsibility, sympathy, and love for Lennie. George’s decision to kill Lennie was out of sympathy for him.
George killing Lennie is justified. Lennie was either gonna get killed by the other men or George. The other men were only doing it because they hated Lennie, George would have done it for the sake of Lennie’s safety and mental state. George would have felt guilty if he did not handle it himself. One reason George was justified in killing Lennie was that George had realized Lennie would never get better and their dream would never come true.
In the novella, Of Mice and Men, by John Steinbeck, George’s decision to kill Lennie at the end of the novel was justified. George and Lennie were best friends, and have been since they were little. They got ran out of Weed(the old farm they used to work at) for harassing a girl and not letting her go. He was just scared from her screaming and kicking. He didn’t mean to harm, or scare her.