ipl-logo

How Did Lenin Contribute To The Russian Revolution

690 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Short note on1905 russian revolution

The Russian Revolution was partly the inspiration of Karl Marx, a German economist and the founder of revolutionary communism. The main tenet of Marxist theory is that economic relations are the most important relations between people. It then teaches that in making any finished product, there are several elements: raw materials, factory and machinery, the factory manager and owner (called capitalist,) and the workman. Marxism and other socialist theories were advocated by various groups in Russia at the end of the nineteenth century and in the early years of this century when the despotic Russia monarchy still kept the common people in cruel, medieval serfdom, amounting to slavery. Although there was great wealth in the country, it was not industrialized to the extent of Western Europe. Most of the people were illiterate, and very miserable living conditions were common. There …show more content…

2 Under Lenin's guidance the communist Party and the Soviet Government make every effort to rehabilitate the national economy as quickly as possible and improve the material situation of the people. There are events and dates in the history of all nations, which leave the mark of a wound in the hearts of millions of people. History confirms Lenin's words that "victory in war goes to the side whose people has peater reserves, greater sources of strength and greater endurance ".3 Today socialism is a powerful material and moral factor, and by its existence it stimulates the struggle of 4he working people against the capitalist system and actively influences the countries that tave shaken off colonial dependence. The development of the productive forces is the objective foundation of social changes. Moreover, the role played by the communist movement also grows in connection with the processes taking place in the developing countries, especially in those, which have no Marxist-Leninist

Show More
Related
501 Words | 3 Pages

This attitude, a product of an impoverished society, led Russian-communists to regard revolution as the only solution to this detrimental system. Kennan notes the use of Marxism as justification for the desire

Read More
203 Words | 1 Pages

Lenin is suspicious of us in Russia as he sent 120,000 Russians to help with our relief work. I’m supervising 16,000 Russians in 900 kitchens we set up in Samara. I’m happy to say we ‘re achieving beyond our goal as Russian adults are now being fed and we’ve been supplied of a lot of grains that arrived on 6th February in Novorossiysk. A colleague of mine David Kinne was dismissed as Lenin’s CHEKA agents exploited his alcohol addiction in February 1922. I see Lenin’s motive and that is to try and hinder our work.

Read More
1093 Words | 5 Pages

Karl Marx was born May 5th 1818 in Germany. The economic ideas of Karl Marx were specifically that he did not believe in people having great ideas to change the economy but rather that all people needed was to be able to live a decent life, meaning that they had food to eat and a home. For Karl Marx the economic system had to be equal values, and therefore eradicating classes. Therefore arises Communism, which is the defined by the Chambers Concise Dictionary (2009) as “A political ideology advocating a classless society, the abolition of private ownership, and collective ownership by the people of all sources of wealth and production.” The ideas of Karl Marx were adopted in many countries across the globe for example the USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Russia) that existed from 1922 to 1991 when the idea of socialism and communism failed and

Read More
725 Words | 3 Pages

Firstly, in order to move Russia into a fully communist state, as believed by Marx, it needed to have a completely industrialized economy . Therefore, Stalin’s changes to the Russian economy were not only for aiding in the modernization of the country, but as well incorporated communist beliefs. In addition, by eliminating private business and moving ownership to the government, standard prices were created, which made goods more accessible to the public. And lastly, by creating a focus on industrialization, many peasants were able to rise in social class by becoming members of the working caste. In fact, employment in Russia from 1928 to 1932 more than doubled, increasing from 11.5 million to 24 million .

Read More
390 Words | 2 Pages

In the beginning of the 19th century, the Industrial Revolution caused a massive economic spike from small-scale production to large factories and mass production. Capitalism became the prevalent mode of the economy, which put all means of production in the hands of the bourgeoisie, or the upper class. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels argue that capitalism centralizes all the wealth and power in the bourgeoisie, despite the proletariat, or the working class, being the overwhelming majority of the population. The manufacturers would exploit the common proletariat and force them to would work in abysmal conditions and receive low wages, furthering the working class poverty. “The Communist Manifesto” predicts that as a result of the mistreatment

Read More
1337 Words | 6 Pages

The Industrial Revolution cast its shadow upon European cities and towns. Some enjoyed this shade while others suffered tremendously because of it. Those who enjoyed the luxuries and wealth that the Industrial Revolution provided, the bourgeoisie, depended on the needs of the poor, the proletarians, to increase the size of their monstrous factories and ultimately their wealth and influence. In “The Communist Manifesto” Karl Marx discusses the effects of the Industrial Revolution in further dividing society by creating new social and economic hierarchies. In addition to his observation of the division of labor, Karl Marx believed, that due to the technological shift from craftsmanship to machinery this also caused division of labor and the appreciation of proletarian handmade goods was disregarded.

Read More
1543 Words | 7 Pages

Andre Abi Haidar PSPA 210 INTRODUCTION It is always difficult to write about and discuss Karl Marx, or more importantly the applications of Marx’s theories, due to the fact that he inspired and gave rise to many movements and revolutionaries, not all of which follow his theories to the point. Although Marx tends to be equated with Communism, it might not seem righteous to blame him for whatever shortcomings occurred when his theories were put to the test; Marx passed away well before the revolution in Russia, and he played no role in the emergence of the totalitarian regime at the time. When discussing Marx, however, Vladimir Lenin is one of the biggest highlights when it comes to studying the outcomes of Marx’s theories.

Read More
926 Words | 4 Pages

It is argued that social inequality occurs because of the conflict between the upper-class and the working-class, or as Marx defines it, the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat. Based on the Manifesto of the Communist Party (Marx and Engels, 1848), the divergence emerges because the aim of the Bourgeoisie is to obtain a surplus-value that is produced by the work of the Proletariat. On the other side, the Bourgeoisie provides the Proletariat with the minimum required, such as a place to live and a minimum wage, in order to keep the society under control and avoid a rebellion. However, Marx did predict a revolt of the working-class that would eventually lead to a communist regime. When it comes to applying this theoretical approach to reality, it is evident to notice that no global revolt in regards to capitalism has occurred.

Read More
1175 Words | 5 Pages

The proletariat was the foundation of Russia’s industry. Yet, Tsar Nicholas II refused to acknowledge their grievances, nor did he implement measures to improve their working conditions. But, their plight did not go unnoticed and change was on the horizon. The Russian Social Democratic Labor Party, formed in 1898 on Marxist ideology, saw the proletariat as the catalyst they needed to establish a socialistic society in Russia.

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

In bourgeoisie society, there is living labor, but it is used to increase collected labour but in a communist society, collected labour exists but it is broadened, improved and shows appreciation and encouragement to the existence of the laborer. Communist robs no man of the authority to apposite the products of civilization. Mark speaks about different divisions of communist and literature. He mentions the reactionary socialism which includes the bourgeois socialists which are individuals who fight against the bourgeoisie society and their development of production. They are against the bourgeoisie because they see their approach of life as a hazard.

Read More
1891 Words | 8 Pages

Marx saw capital and liberal democracies as the fundamental reasons for the low standards of living and the low social conditions of workers. Karl Marx in particular is especially concerned with the political assumptions behind these two ideologies. According to him, these two types of government should be replaced by communism, since communism would provide a more equal and socially just society. Although this statement may seem unusual, since we tend to associate communism with Stalin and China, the type of communism implemented in these countries is different from the communism that Marx and Engels envisaged in their Communist Manifesto. Marx and Engels’ vision of communism is based on the principle of equality among the people and freedom

Read More
506 Words | 3 Pages

In today’s culture, a main topic of controversy is abortion. Abortion has been around since the late 1800s and has become more popular through the years. There are two sides that associate with abortion, pro-life and pro-choice. These two sides show women the reasons they should or should not have abortions. Because of abortions, the debate between the pro-choice and pro-life advocates has progressed in the sense of intensity and has affected many women in this generation.

Read More
1198 Words | 5 Pages

Having been born during the period wherein immense industrialization characterized the different parts of Europe, Karl Marx (1818-1883) was particularly attuned of the changes in social, political, and economic systems taking place in the region. By examining the effects of industrialization as well as drawing from the ideas of German theorist Hegel and Feuerbach, Marx developed his concept of dialectical historical materialism which is a way of illustrating the change from one society to another (Cuzzort and King, 1980). For Marx, society exists primarily to fulfill the needs of the people, noting that the process of material production is the base of all human societies. The process of material production, according to Marx, entails two important components: the forces of production-which include tools, technology, and human skills, and the relations of production-refer to the social relations of individuals in the production process (Ritzer, 2011). Karl Marx’s perspective plays a major role in understanding our contemporary Caribbean societies such as understanding the problems and contradictions that exist in society and it provides an articulated vision for change.

Read More
1486 Words | 6 Pages

Karl Marx (1818-1883) considered himself not to be a sociologist but a political activist. However, many would disagree and in the view of Hughes (1986), he was ‘both – and a philosopher, historian, economist, and a political scientist as well.’ Much of the work of Marx was political and economic but his main focus was on class conflict and how this led to the rise of capitalism. While nowadays, when people hear the word “communism”, they think of the dictatorial rule of Stalin and the horrific stories of life in a communist state such as the Soviet Union, it is important not to accuse Marx of the deeds carried out in his name.

Read More
1177 Words | 5 Pages

In the Communist manifesto, a well known quote of Marx, “the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” This is introductory to the first part of the pamphlet and a conclusion to Marx’s theory about class struggle. Marx’s highly structured on how the class struggle emerges and affects the development of a society. The development of a society from the old and from the new is the result of the conflict of classes in the society.

Read More

More about How Did Lenin Contribute To The Russian Revolution

Related Topics

Open Document