More handpicked essays just for you.
How peter the great impacted russia
How peter the great impacted russia
Peter the great of russia westernization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
He built an army of 210,000 men and a navy from scratch (Doc4). He was a feared leader an was disliked because of how he ruled. Peter had a goal of conquering the Baltic sea because of the warm water to trade. In attempt to reach this goal, the Swedish King, Charles XII, defeated him at Narva (Doc 2). To overcome his defeat he improved his armies and worked even harder for mastery of the Baltic.
In times of trouble, monarchs must make tough decisions that will directly impact their nation and their legacy. Frederick the Great and Peter the Great took different approaches when they saw their countries falling behind. Peter improved Russia by abandoning certain traditions and focusing on westernizing the county, while Frederick took the opposite approach and attempted to strengthen German culture and heritage. They were both autocratic in their leadership style, and lead their countries into wars for power. The three best points for comparing Frederick the Great and Peter the Great's leadership styles are their handling of social issues, domination attempts, and the rise to power.
Peter the Great did a lot to help Russia become a great power. It took him his whole 40 years to do this for Russia. The main goal for Peter in order to make Russia a great power was to westernize it. He thought if you modernize the country then the country would be strong. Peter wanted to have a capital near the water so the navy would be strong and it would be easier for trade.
In addition, to these reforms he sought to westernize Russia in other ways, whether it was the dress of those in the Russian courts, the establishing of Western style education and creating a state that effectively raised revenue. With that being said Peter would expand taxes, which would prove to be particularly burdensome for peasants (Riansovsky 234). But this was necessary so that Peter could
In Document 3 he expresses this by saying “Since our accession to the throne all our efforts and intentions have tended to govern this realm in such a way that all of our subjects should, through our care for the general good, become more and more prosperous”. Peter only wanted what was best for his people but his people didn’t see it that way sometimes. Document 6 expresses how Peter the Great’s decision to change their style of the dress actually affected them. Before Peter changed the dress conditions Russians used to dress as the document says: Until that time the Russians had always worn long beards, which they cherished and preserved with much care, allowing them to hang down on their bosoms, without even cutting the mustache. The Russians found Peter a tyrant and a pagan due to his decision to change their cultural dress.
Did you know that Alexander the Great was one of the greatest conquers? Alexander was born in 358 B.C. and he lived in a kingdom in Greece called Macedonia. Alexander was the son of the King Phillip II, and Alexander became king. During his life, did Alexander show enough leadership, courage, and concern for others to be considered great? By these measures, Alexander was great for at least three reasons: military genius, inspiring leader, and spread of Greek cultures.
Philip II was an absolute monarch who believed his authority came from God and he tried his best to always bring justice. The first reason that Philip II was the best absolute monarch was because during his reign, Spain was the most powerful nation in Europe. He made Spain powerful by having a strong economy to strengthen his armies. Philip needed a strong
Peter the Great accomplished a lot during his reign, yet there were incidents where he used terror to get his way with the empire. As for Catherine, she let her personal relationships impact her political decisions. “She had sent troops to help the Polish king Stanislas (a former lover) in suppressing a nationalist revolt aimed at reducing Russia's influence in Poland.” Conspiring with her lovers on official empress business, makes Catherine appear to be an unqualified ruler by letting her opinions be altered by her intimate relationships. Having secrets behind their actual official ruling leads both Catherine and Peters reputation came off as bad regardless of how they were as rulers.
Alexander the Great is a superior leader based on the fact that he gave the people great rich lives during his rule. Alexander the Great was a great military leader along with his life and legacy. The great Alexander’s early life was one filled with death and controlling figures.
Alexander the Great was great. He was the king of the ancient greek kingdom. Alexander the Great was Great because, He was a smart military genius for example in DOC B, he used the enemies weapons against them and they hurt them instead of alexander and his troops. He kept telling Porus and his kingdom that he was going to come and raid him but, he never did it.
Alexander the Great is one of the best leaders military wise and has created one of the best Militaries ever. According to History.com, “Alexander’s military genius is undisputed. He improved the fine army inherited from his father, Philip, by the addition of allied forces; he strengthened the cavalry arm, utilized weapons specialists, and employed a corps of engineers; he was invincible in both siege warfare and set battles. ”(4) This proves that Alexander the Great is a hero because he improved almost everything that the macedonians had before King Phillip's death was King and a Hero would help other people become stronger and healthier to fight.
Also, during this time period, Frederick William I transformed Prussia into a military state. To become an absolute ruler, Peter the Great made many reforms throughout Russia. However, all these absolute leaders had the same goal. Even though they reigned over different countries, they all strengthened their armies, raised taxes, and unified religion. One thing that all absolute rulers did was increase the strength of their army.
Peter the Great and Louis XIV were both the greatest rulers of their times. Both of them were autocrats having unlimited power and on the contrary both of them were absolutists. Louis XIV was the ruler of France and nicknamed “The Sun King” and Peter the Great was the ruler of Russia. Although Peter the Great and Louis XIV has some different successes, they had several noticeable similarities such as power, buildings, and armies/economical growths. Peter the Great and Louis XIV had similar successes in their famous buildings.
There are many different views and perceptions on leadership and what it exactly means. This is because there are many different types of leaders and many different views on them. But the basic meaning of leadership is an individual who can select the right group of followers and influence them through their distinct gifts, abilities, skills and knowledge. A leader focuses on the follower and puts out a roadmap to the overall mission and vision; hereby the follower is influenced to willingly and enthusiastically in achieving the mission and vision. The leader achieves this influence by humbly delivering a visionary perception of the future in clear terms that resonates with the follower in terms of their believes and values.
“Is what you want? A miserable little bourgeois republic? In the name of the great Soviet republic of labour we declare war to the death on such a government!” (Bukharin, 1917) . The Russians were fed up of being poorly treated by their own country, so they decided to take a stance.
