Rousseau is one of the most controversial figures, however undoubtedly the most prominent representative of the social criticism of the Enlightenment (Victor Gourevitch, 1997, pp.ix). It is generally accepted that his ideas have played a huge role in the American Revolution and the colossal to the preparation, to the outbreak and to the foundation of the French Revolution. So his ideas took root in a new Republic and the law of revolution based on the political positions of the thinker and especially as expressed in his work of the "Social Contract"(Victor Gourevitch, 1997, pp.ix). The impact of the work of Rousseau is not limited the abovementioned countries his ideas arrived in the birthplace of Geneva, in Germany, in Russia and final in …show more content…
Thus man becomes a prisoner of social recognition and vanity and a demonstration and culture contribute to the impression of hypocrisy and raise the vanity. All this leads to the need for recognition, wealth, in arrogance, the rivalry, the competition to lead in controversies and conflict. So through the full development of social relations leads to global war. To overcome this problem Rousseau is led to the search of some kind of solution. (Melzer, 1983, pp. …show more content…
The social contract is thus a supreme act inexpensive commitment of responsibility towards the common good. In general, conditions of social Contract can be summarized in a single word which is the complete delivery of each party with all of the rights to the entire community. Regarding this point, the Rousseau suffered intense criticism because of several scholars view was that this leads to tyranny and totalitarianism since through this sacrifice t 'individual rights. These considerations are considered false, because Rousseau through the view of this he wants to show the removal of the natural rights of man, but the transformation from physical to political rights. Additionally, in the basic condition of the social contract we can see the reasons for its proposing from Rouseau. The first reason is because the agreement is made on equal terms for all. So if the conditions are equal for everyone no one's interest to make them heavier conditions for others. Moreover, since every citizen is given to all and there is no one who does not acquire all of the above same rights conferred on themselves, everyone wins equal than lose additional larger version and better strength to maintain what they