ipl-logo

How Did Sula Felix Contribute To The Rise Of Julius Caesar

1932 Words8 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay on julius caesar's impact

Lucius Cornelius’ Sulla Felix rose from a lifestyle of poverty and unimportance as a quaestor, to have an incredible public and military career that helped influence the rise of the Roman Republic. His achievements of great honors and memorable deeds led and culminated his incumbency of high-ranking power and influence. He aided mostly in the success of Jugurthine War by tricking King Bocchus into betraying his ally Jugurtha and to become an ally of the Romans. Sulla battled with Marius against the revolt of the Italian allies and gained more influence over others when he triumphantly won. After long battles with the Mithridates, he consulted with them to end the battle. Because of Sulla and Marius’ rivalry, they sparked the first Roman civil …show more content…

The Social War (90-88 BC) was a war between Rome and the rebellious Italians who wanted to establish an independent Italian state. Sulla and Marius were under command of Julius Caesar. The war resulted in a Roman victory, although Italian rights were guaranteed. As Marius started to dispute with Sulla, the Social war flamed up, and Sulla’s abilities became …show more content…

Furthermore, Sulla’s perverted and arrogant character is revealed through his actions once he gained full power. According to Dowling's “The Clemency of Sulla”, Livy implied in his writings about Sulla that “the moment Sulla took control of Rome he lost every Republican virtue he possessed and was transformed into a tyrant, overwhelmed and distorted in his very nature by power beyond what any man should bear” (Dowling 328). From this, it reflected how he abused his position as dictator, even though he started with a lot of power and influence that could have contributed to the rise of Rome, but he let his arrogance get to him. From his influence in the senate as a leader of armies, he abused his power of dictator by creating proscriptions and reforming the government that led to the downfall of the

Show More
Related

How Did Brutus Influence Roman Republic Government

365 Words | 2 Pages

Lucius was a powerful emperor. who changed rome’s monarchy to Roman Republic. Lucius Junius Brutus was born in ancient Rome. He died in 495 BC at Cumae Italy. His family was Etruscan.

Read More

Assess The Significance Of Pompey's Early Military And Political Career

440 Words | 2 Pages

138 BC, is considered very significant to Roman history and has left a notable legacy behind after his death in 78 BC. Sulla was famous as he left the legacy of the reforms of the Constitutions of the Rome Republic, laws specifically targeted towards the cursus honorum. In these reforms, Sulla aimed to reduce the level of political power the plebeian tribunes had in society, and remove the existing democracy, also believing in adding power to the Roman senate. Despite these reforms lasting many years after his death, eventually revoked by Pompey and Crassus, Caesar still destroyed the reforms in later years, meaning that his legacy in regards to his constitutional reforms were short lived. He also stands out in history, having served as consul twice, and achieving a dictatorship in Rome, alongside many military successes, including his involvement in the Social War.

Read More

Why Did Sulla Seal The Fate Of The Roman Republic

934 Words | 4 Pages

with other individuals, such as Caesar, marking on Rome with an army less than 50 years later. Sulla’s military power and subsequent dictatorship broke many Republic traditions and the constitutional model, and in this way it can be interpreted that Sulla’s march on Rome did seal the fate of the Roman Republic. Additionally, Sulla’s use of violence during the 2nd Civil is also seen to deteriorate the traditions of the Roman Republic government and set another new precedent of conduct in Rome, with Paterculus citing Sulla had ‘carte blanche for unrestrained conduct in Rome’. (Velleius Paterculus 2.28) Sulla issued a series of proscriptions, a list of individuals that he deemed enemies of the state.

Read More

Should Marcus Brutus Join The Conspiracy Against Julius Caesar?

797 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus' use of a simile comparing Caesar to an adder in its shell demonstrates this perfectly. While yes, Caesar showed little to be suspected of abusing power, as Brutus said, “And, to speak truth of Caesar, I have not known when his affections swayed more than his reason (II, i, 19-21).” This alone shows that Caesar clearly was not showing anything to be considered a reason as to him being power hungry or looking to abuse power, however the conspirators had little options as if he became too powerful, it’d already be too late for them to dethrone

Read More

Sula's Confederate Allies

1032 Words | 5 Pages

Why did all of Sulla’s own officers, except one, desert him during his first march on Rome in 88 BCE? The act to march on Rome, taken by Sulla in attempt to prevent Sulpicius, Marius, his son and nine other who conspire together was vicious crime by the laws and beliefs of the Roman Republic. Nevertheless, Sulla, decided to go ahead with that risky and unpopular decision in an attempt to intervene and stop Sulpicius. Regardless of that, in the face of such illegal act all of his officers but one deserted him, nevertheless Sulla, accomplish his goal thanks of the faithful support of his soldiers.

Read More

Examples Of Power Corrupt In Julius Caesar

1108 Words | 5 Pages

“Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, this is a prevalent quote to most of the characters. This was true in particular to the characters of Brutus, Julius Caesar, and Cassius. Although some of these characters in the start of the play may have seemed without the corruption of power, they all developed it at some point in the play. To Brutus it seemed to make him nobler without the gain of any success from power.

Read More

Why Did The Roman Republic Fall

913 Words | 4 Pages

Many different internal and external pressures lead to the destruction of the Roman Republic. Cornelius Sulla, a Roman general, dictator and optimate, anticipated and was aware of the results of many powerful and

Read More

Julius Caesar Leader Analysis

1556 Words | 7 Pages

Some flaws can make you a good or a bad leader, depending on how they are used or directed. One of these such traits is ambition. Marc Antony was very ambitious, which could have been very good for him as leader, but he was so ambitious that he killed his own family members. This is very important, because he does this to not anger his fellow rulers of Rome. If someone is willing to kill off their own family, then how can one know they will not kill others to stay in power?

Read More

Was Sula Responsible For The Downfall Of The Roman Republic

756 Words | 4 Pages

The End of Romans Sulla became prominent during Social War. After gaining command in 88 B.C. Sulla’s alliance was broken with Marius because Sulla did not want to give up his troops. Instead of outright saying Sulla wouldn’t give command, he manipulated his troops to see why changing leadership would be a bad idea. In 82 B.C., Sulla marched his troops for the second time to Rome to take command of the Roman Republic. Upon Sulla’s arrival in Rome, the Senate gave him the title of dictator out of fear of his army.

Read More

How Did Pax Romana Change Society

978 Words | 4 Pages

The civil war that followed was won by Julius Caesar adopted son, Octavian. In reaction, the Roman senate handed over an immense amount of power to Ocativan by honoring him as “the first citizen”,

Read More

Theme Of Corruption In Julius Caesar

974 Words | 4 Pages

Corruption is defined as dishonest or illegal behavior, especially by powerful people, and just like its definition, corruption and power go hand in hand. The more power a person has, generally, the easier it is for them to be corrupted. Just like in Julius Caesar where power and corruption are very prevalent, and most of the leaders in Julius Caesar became corrupted by their power, but in some rare cases leaders have avoided corruption, these people are very valuable in society, and must not be taken for granted. Just like many other leaders in Julius Caesar, Caesar was corrupted by his power. He wasn’t corrupt in the normal sense, he was socially corrupt in the fact that he didn’t stick to the social norms of respecting fellow senators in

Read More

Compare And Contrast Lincoln And Julius Caesar

1084 Words | 5 Pages

The civil war in Rome started because the conservative members of the republican senate did not like how much power Caesar was gaining and because they were more socially traditional. Both of these leaders were assassinated by someone for political differences. Caesar was assassinated by the senators who opposed Caesar because they feared how much power he had. Caesar was attacked by over 60 members of the senate and received 23 stab wounds. It was led by Mark Antony and Brutus Albinus who was a close friend of Caesar and shocked him by his betrayal.

Read More

Sulla's Influence On Julius Caesar

1608 Words | 7 Pages

The fundamental basis for Sulla’s rise to power was his success in the military, through his military ability he was able to win various wars for Rome gaining him favour from the senate leading to his rise to power. Sulla showcased his military ability in the Mithraic war, the social war and the civil war. In the Mithraic war Sulla was sent by the senate to defeat the Mithridates as they had extended in the Roman province of Asia.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Julius Caesar

1255 Words | 6 Pages

Julius Caesar was a Powerful Roman politician and general, who served as a god to the Romans. He played a key role in the events that led to the downfall of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman empire. His reign from 49 B.C to 44 B.C illustrated his dominance in controlling a commanding army and ruling a nation. Many historians have different opinions on Caesar's command. Some saw him as a leader for the people, whereas others saw him as a man searching for power and power alone.

Read More

Julius Caesar: Hero Or Villain

508 Words | 3 Pages

The final reason why Julius Caesar was a villain is the fact that he took action first without thinking about what the consequences would be. Some people might say that Caesar was a hero because he conquered new lands and saved Rome from the hardships of war. Except Caesar, like stated before, only cared about fame and wealth so, he sought out to conquer new lands when really he just started the wars and put Rome in a zone of danger. He started unnecessary wars without thinking about how the rise of taxes (due to the war) would affect the economic part of Rome and it’s citizens.

Read More

More about How Did Sula Felix Contribute To The Rise Of Julius Caesar

Related Topics

Open Document