ipl-logo

How Did The Cotton Gin Prevent The Civil War

1113 Words5 Pages

The American Civil War was fought in the United States from 1861 to 1865. The result of a long-standing disagreement over slavery, war broke out in April 1861, when Confederates attacked Fort Sumter . The Civil War marked a defining moment in United States history. Compromises concerning slavery, states' rights, and economical issues were created to satisfy the North and South, but were not efficient enough to ease the differences to prevent the Civil War. A common explanation is that the Civil War was fought over the issues of slavery. In fact, it was the economics of slavery and political control of that system that was central to the conflict. As the United became an independent nation many African Americans enslaved in the North states …show more content…

In 1794; Eli Whitney patented the cotton gin.The cotton gin indirectly influenced the Civil War by changing the economics of the cotton industry. Once the cotton gin came along, it meant that more cotton could be processed by less slaves in less time. Another thing that went along with the cause of the Civil war was the Louisiana purchase.The Louisiana Purchase was a land deal between the United States and France, in which the U.S. acquired approximately 827,000 square miles of land west of the Mississippi River for $15 million.Some citizens thought this was unfair, because the purchase greatly reduced their political power in the Government. This caused much division between the colonists. Another issue that led up to the Civil War caused by the Louisiana Purchase was slavery. The westward expansion which was also related to the Louisiana purchase dealt with the causes of the civil war. To many nineteenth century Americans, the expansion of slavery into Western territories caused a great deal of arguments. These fears were realized when the expansion of slavery into western territories entered Congressional debates. The louisiana purchase was a big effect on the Civil

Show More
Related
781 Words | 4 Pages

“By purchasing the territory from France, the United States was directly antagonizing Spain”(3). The newly expanded borders of the U.S. were right along the area the Spanish owned, potentially resulting in war, which the American citizens certainly did not want. Along with the potential conflict with Spain, came the possibility of conflict with the Native Americans already inhabiting the land. Aside from these potential international problems, there were also internal conflicts. “Prior to the Louisiana Purchase, a geographical and political balance existed between slave and free states, with neither side possessing the population or political power to force an agenda upon rival states”(3), but the addition of new states would completely overthrow the

Read More
803 Words | 4 Pages

In the early half of the 19th century, the differences between the North and South resulted in the Civil War. The major difference between the two was that the North was anti-slavery, and the South was pro-slavery. Since the difference between the two territories was so drastic, it is safe to say that slavery was the overarching cause of the Civil War. The outburst of the Civil War was built on the frustration of the poor treatment of slaves, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In the South, a central reason for slaves was so that they would help maintain a landowner’s planation.

Read More
263 Words | 2 Pages

The young(er) United States was burdened with a multitude of issues and rising growth of sectionalism; from the Louisiana Purchase to Tarrifs, the bridge partitioning the North and South was ever-growing. Divisions between slave and anti-slave culture were devastating, Northerners turned against Southerners, friend against friend; brother against brother. The Louisiana Purchase was the aquisition of the Louisiana Territory from France, specifically Napoleon, by Jefferson. It was sold for an estimated 15 million dollars and near-doubled the size of the United States. While the purchase was beneficial for the U.S, it also caused many problems in and among the citizens.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

The rapid increase of new territory displayed America’s desire to expand, but it also brought up the question of whether slavery should be allowed in the new land. Compromises

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

Civil War LEQ When the United States admitted more Western territories into the Union, their only goal was to expand the country as much as possible. They did not foresee how extending slavery into western territories could lead to a Civil War. The controversy over the extension of slavery into western territories contributed to the Civil war by politicizing the issue so no politician could be neutral on it, by creating a fight for economic influence between the North and South, and by increasing the feelings superiority/separation between the North and South.

Read More
710 Words | 3 Pages

During the early 1800s, the North and the South had severe political differences ranging from different interpretations of the federal laws to state laws. With the addition of the Louisiana Purchase, the North and the South disputed between the division of the new lands, which caused even more disagreement. The different conflicts caused sectionalism in which each region became aware of their own beliefs and their own methods. The South began to believe they were politically inferior in terms of electing an official in their favors and interpreting the laws, as compared to their Northern counterparts, which led to the South’s decision to secede, giving rise to the Civil War.

Read More
360 Words | 2 Pages

Over the time period of the of the 1800s, many conflicts happened that lead to the the Civil War. The Civil War was a war that occurred between 1861 and 1865, between the Union States, also known as the North and the Confederates States of America, known as the South. The key issues that caused the South to secede from the Union and eventually lead to the Civil War were the Wilmot Proviso, slavery, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, the Compromise of 1850, and the Election of 1860. As you may know, the Wilmot Proviso was an 1846 proposal that outlawed slavery in any territory gained from the War with Mexico. This led to people bringing slaves into new territories, which caused bigger conflicts between proslavery and antislavery supporters.

Read More
573 Words | 3 Pages

So while the Southern and Northern states had their disagreements they also had the same point of view with certain things. The north feared that the abolitionist

Read More
819 Words | 4 Pages

The most important social issues during the antebellum era were the issues regarding the South’s perceived oppression from the federal government and the differing ideas over how black people should be viewed on federal, state, and social levels. Though debates over slavery were one of the issues separating them, the North and the South had a plethora of different issues that overshadowed the ones regarding slavery. The actual issue over slavery was just another one of the subjects that Northerners and Southerners argued about. Though, nowadays, it seems like slavery was one of if not the main debate topic that led to the American Civil War, it doesn’t seem that way when taking a closer look. Though slavery wasn’t as much of a mainstream issue that led to the Civil War as many today believe, there is no doubt that slavery was a significant issue at the time.

Read More
972 Words | 4 Pages

Slavery was overall the direct cause of the Civil War. However, many events in the years leading up to the Civil War also contributed to its beginning. Unfair laws such as the Fugitive Slave Act and the Kansas-Nebraska Act contributed by infuriating the Northerners who were against slavery. The Dred Scott decision kept the Southerners happy, but angered the Northerners, furthering the divide between the North and the South. Two other events that led to the Civil War were John Brown’s Raid and the election of 1860, which angered the South.

Read More
965 Words | 4 Pages

Additionally, the dispute over free land that America and Mexico had a separated conflict, before conquering Texas and New Mexico and California was defeated as well. One side stood on the fact that the free land should be decided only by white Americans, they should be used by farmers, and the farming industry should develop freely, and the slaves claimed that they had the same rights as other individuals. The border slave states and northern part tried to compromise a reconciliation of the sections; Lincoln led the Republicans in rejecting the proposed because this would let slavery to extend and to spread on Southwest (Divine page 345-347). To illustrate, the main cause of a Civil War in the United States became the sharpest contradictions between different socio-economic systems that existed in one state-the north and the slave-owning in the southern society. After Lincoln won the election, that was for the slave owners of the south a signal of danger and led to a secession - the withdrawal of the southern states from the Union.

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

The civil war is associated with southern succession, slavery, and the Republican Party, all factors which this dispute entailed. The initiation for such conflict though, lies in the territorial expansion that Americans believed was destined for the United States at the time. Territorial expansion pinned Americans against one another when debating whether the new states should be slaves states or not, questioned the power the Federal government had in comparison to states’ rights, and put at risk the unity of the U.S.A as a nation. With a vast majority of land acquired through agreements such as the Louisiana Purchase it was difficult to decide whether slavery should spread further west, not do so, or be equally distributed. How this was going to take place led to a long and costly conflict known as the American Civil War.

Read More
604 Words | 3 Pages

To a greater extent, slavery was the greatest cause of the outbreak of the civil war in 1860. Disputes of slavery caused economic and political troubles between the northern and southern states leading up to the civil war. The fact the the northern and southern states were different in almost every way caused them to turn out like completely different territories, one of their greatest differences was the fact that most southern states economy relied on hard labour, agricultural jobs like tobacco in Maryland, and cotton in Virginia; this caused their economy to be more based on the labour of slaves than the more developed territories in the north (Harrold), who after this time was starting to not need the slave labour in their territories because after early 1800’s, the industrial revolution had been spreading to America, and the country developed very quickly. But in this expansion, only the north states were getting the effect of the industrial revolution, meaning the north would not need slave

Read More
1159 Words | 5 Pages

There were three main causes of the civil war including slavery, sectionalism and secession. Slavery was a huge part of it and it led to the Missouri Compromise where any states below the border would be slave states and the anything north of that was free states. (Mrs. Wise) "The south feared the declaration of freedom for the slaves by government leaders in the North." Next, sectionalism. Sectionalism-

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

One of the several factors that helped cause the Civil War was the economy at the time. While the economy wasn’t in bad shape, the North and South were different and had very different views and ideas about their futures. The Northern area couldn 't have huge farms like the South. However, they were very diverse in the items they wanted to produce.

Read More

More about How Did The Cotton Gin Prevent The Civil War

Related Topics

Open Document