Historiography is the study of how history is written and the different perspectives of the past provided by different historians. Revolutions and wars are main events that historians love to pick apart due to so many different point of views or conclusions that they can assume. The Loyalists position on the revolution was, “...more sympathetic to Britain and more antagonistic to those responsible for the revolution” (American Revolution Historiography). Whig historians on the other hand, saw the revolution as a journey of progress and advancement. The Progressives, a new breed of historians, said that the revolution was based by economic factors and self interest. Along with the Progressives, was the Imperial School, who said the American …show more content…
The Whigs, or Patriots, saw the revolution as an advancement in subjects such as idealism, nationalism, and progress. “...Rockingham Whigs has done much to assist this development” (Paul Langford, Old Whigs, p. 106). There was a struggle between two important factors, the forces of liberty and modernity which was in American, and then “the regressive, corrupt and morally bankrupt Old World (Britain)” (American Revolution Historiography). The Whigs saw the American Revolution as a big help to the Colonies, or the United States. This revolution was seen as a very important event in human history. To create advancement in the United States, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights were written. These were able to give more rights to the colonists which led them to become more independent and help advance as a country. A well-known Whig and writer, Thomas Paine, put the first Amendment to good use , by convincing the Americans to break away from the chains of Britain ( The other political party that I agree with is the New Left. This group believes that class, economic conditions, race, gender, and ‘unheard voices’ had a big effect on the revolution. All of the focuses were a barrier between the Colonists, which paused unity. The ‘unheard voices’, mostly farmers and lower-class, started to loose trust in the fundamental of authority, generally the high-class