Nicholas II’s inability to respond to or embrace change was the determining factor in the decline of the Romanov Dynasty. To what extent is this statement accurate? Introduction: The inability of Tsar Nicholas 11 to respond to or embrace political and social change during a time of crisis contributed significantly to the collapse of the Romanov rule over Russia.
He started the trend of “czars” in Russian government and declared himself the czar or Caesar. He was also referred to as the “gatherer of the Russian lands”. He realized that there was a problem with having 5 princes govern the same area and made strives to gain complete authority. He used several different methods to take control away from his brothers and the author says that despite his skilled efforts (diplomacy, force) luck was a vital component to his gaining the power. 2.
Many economic factors led to the collapse of the Russian empire. Those factors not only affected the empire, they also affected the people inside of the empire. By examining these factors, we can find out how they led to the fall of Russia. The collapse of the Russian Empire was primarily caused by a combination of weak industrialization, agricultural inefficiencies, and the economic strain of funding World War I. These factors, among others, contributed to the downfall of the empire.
Russian tsars are authoritative Christian monarchs which started in 1721 from one of the first emperors named Peter I the Great. This empire lasted until 1917 when Nicholas had to abdicate his throne due to many reasons and considered a backward country. There is also a speculation about two family members surviving the firing squad. The Russian tsars established in 1672 and Peter I the great was Russia’s first emperor.
With no signs of the czar’s attempt to solve the complications, Russia banded together and filled the streets with strikes and riots. A revolution was peaking among the peasants. The uprising brought Nicholas ll no choice but to abdicate his throne. This was an opportunity
Furthermore, Nicholas allowed his country to enter two wars, the Russo-Japanese war and WWI, Russia being ill-prepared for the wars both times. The battles did not go well in either of the wars and his actions dealt great suffering to the people of Russia, especially the minority, or lower class. Although his country was in peril and he knew it, he refused to implement reforms. Tsar Nicholas II truly wanted to aid his country although his inexperience did not allow him to do so. Hence, this led to the murder of his family and the end of 3 centuries of Romanov ruling when the Bolsheviks took power of Russia.
The “Student Resources in Context” article entitled “Nicholas II” begins with a some facts about Nicholas II and his reign along with a brief timeline of his life. The article then sets up Nicholas II’s reign explaining the situation Russia was in and the death of his father. It then describes all the negative qualities of Nicholas II at that point that contributed to his eventual failure in ruling Russia. Immediately into Nicholas II’s reign at his coronation ceremony disaster ensued as members huge crowd trampled each other trying to get food. Nicholas refused to give up any of his power and Russia rushed into a war against Japan which brought Russia far more pain.
The intense economic relationship between the peasants and the Tsar created tension that led to the revolution. In document 3 it states, “…By world war 1, Russia still had the lowest industrial output of any major European power”. This is significant because it suggests that Russia's economy was not as developed or modernized as other European countries. At the time period, industrialization was a key factor in the economy. “Men soon joined them, and on the following day almost every industry, shop and business had stopped functioning - the entire populace went on strike”(document
The fall of the Romanov Monarch changed Russia immensely. Nicholas II came to power when his father died on October
Production, crops and agriculture had started to decline which had led to starvation and numerous deaths. During the Russian Revolution, totalitarian leadership which had led to loss of freedom, loss of speech, and loss of press. During the Russian Revolution, there was a lack of education which had often caused people to be taken advantage of. All these
2- Russia's poor showing in WWI led to a steady decline in confidence for the public. It also led to domestic shortages of bread and other important products. By 1917, revolts forced Tsar Nicholas to abdicate. The following month, Lenin returned to instigate a communist revolution.
The Russian revolutions of February 1917 and October 1917 as discussed by Berend were the earthquake that caused a massive tsunami. As the Bolsheviks took control of Russia, a wave was brewing across Central and Eastern Europe. There are many reasons why the Russian revolutions directly caused and were similar to the Hungarian revolutions, such as rampant economic crises, political prisoners in far away lands, generally bloodless fights, landless peasants, and decreased economic output in major industries like agriculture. However there are three main factors in the revolutions that make them similar: the revolutions were driven by the masses, had rising leaders starting as political prisoners, dealt with border disputes, and were a direct
The Russian Revolution, which was started by Lenin and his followers, was a rebellion that occurred in 1917 which forced higher powers to act to the needs of the lower class. For instance, many citizens were worried for their protection in consequence to the lack of survival necessities due to an early drought. Furthermore, their current czar during the time was incapable for his position as a czar and made horrendous decisions as czar. For example, when the czar, Nicholas, entered in World War I, he sent untrained troops into countless battles of failure which costed in mass amounts of lost life (paragraph 23).
The Russians did not hate the Tsar at first as they blamed their troubles on the government, however an event called Bloody Sunday changed their minds. Citizens began to protest outside of Tsar’s palace where many were shot and killed by soldiers. This turned them against the man they once trusted. World War I also occurred during Tsar’s reign and ultimately killed many unskilled and unequipped Russian soldiers. This caused the citizens to dislike Tsar even
The failures of the wars Russia took part in damaged their economy even more than it already was. The extreme poverty of the Russian people and the overpopulation of the major cities making living condition dreadful. These factors put struggles on the Russian people and it made them very anger at the government. The Tsar, Nicholas II failures to lead the country properly and the consent bad decisions that was made caused outrage with the Russian people. All of these factors are the reason why the Russian Revolution in February 1917
