More handpicked essays just for you.
Civil war combat strategy
Tactics of the civil war
What comparisons can be made in the strategies by the north and the south during the civil war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Civil war combat strategy
Grant was a very prominent figure of the time period and led the Union to victory and helped heal the fractured United States afterward. General Grant began his military career at West Point when he was just sixteen. He was top of his class and when he graduated, he began his four years of service and went into combat in the Mexican-American War. He was promoted to captain as a result of his bravery during the war. After this, his four-year commitment to the army was up, he left and did not expect to come back.
Powell Clayton was a Captain who fought in the bloodiest battle known in American history, he fought for the Union’s side. He lived until he was 80 years old and remained leader until his death. He served as a Captain of the first Kansas infantry and as time went by he slowly rose beyond captain. He was relocated into Arkansas after the war. During the Civil War he decided to join the army.
The importance of this war and need to reestablish the Union caused Grant to take new strategies when waging war. In this war Grant used tactics such as year long warfare, high tempo warfare and siege warfare to destroy the confederates. By doing this he not only secured many major Union victories, but also changed how wars would be fought for years to come. And furthermore, through these new strategies of war we can can see how Grant not only affected the outcome of the war and war itself, but also the people within the war both confederate and federal. Prior to this war, wars had only been waged seasonally so that men could operate their farms or not have to deal with the intense winters.
Ulysses S. Grant By: Isabella Dion Ulysses S. Grant was an important man in the Civil War but his presidency is said to often be overlooked. Grant was said to fail at many things and be one of the worst president the U.S has had. He was a very important man in the Civil War and won the battle that ended the war. Early Life: Ulysses S. Grant was born April 27, 1822 in Point Pleasant, Ohio to Jesse and Hannah Grant.
This showed in his takeover of the Mississippi Valley. During his process to obtain the Mississippi Valley, he gained Fort Henry and fought for Fort Donelson. Soon, the Confederates surrendered and asked for the terms. Grant proposed no compromises. He would only accept complete surrender with no conditions.
Question 1: General Ulysses S. Grant was renowned as an extremely aggressive general who did what had to be done to get the job done. Grant was charged with commanding the entiretyof the Union army; a massive responsibility, to be sure, and took the offensive time and again, leveraging Union resources and numbers to simply overwhelm the Confederacy and claim victory (Weigley, The American Way of War, pg.130). This aggression meant striking at the heart of the Confederate strongholds, forcing Grant and his armies to make difficult presses through extremely heavy resistance, while also ensuring that the Union maintained the material advantage. With this in mind, the primary thesis is that Grant's war-fighting style is more in line with Jomini,
February 1864 Abraham Lincoln the current president at the time made Ulysses S. Grant commander and chief of all the union army. Grant started to plan a major attack on the Confederate´s capital of Richmond. Grants big plan was to keep the confederates busy protecting their capital while another part of the union run in and take Georgia. This would make it impossible for the confederates general Lee to send troops to Georgia. This would be Ulysses S. Grant´s first fight as general for the union.
Did you know that most major Battles of the Civil War were draws? Although the Battle of Antietam was considered a draw, it still gave the Union army a large advantage. Along with the Battle of Antietam, the Battle of Gettysburg was almost a draw, but the Union took the win. Later in the war, a General named Tecumseh Sherman thought that by destroying the southern infrastructure, he would revoke the south of its morale, and its ability to fight. A major theme of the Civil War was war was terrible, as supported by Battles of Antietam, Gettysburg, and General Sherman’s Total War.
Both men were generals in their respective right, yet they chose to fight in different manors. Gen. Sherman used a tactic known as hard war, or also under the more popular name total war. This being the fight of using any means necessary―including weapons, strategy, and rath―to end a battle and land a crushing blow to the enemy in which no opposing soldier walks away healthy. He did not care much for the others or for honor. He only really cared about the well-being of his own troops, which is indeed admirable.
Civil War Fighting Styles During the Civil War, The Union and Confederacy got into a war. The Union adapted the fighting style used by the Teutonics, while the Confederacy adapted to the fighting style used by the Celtic tribe. The fighting styles were very different and unique. It even shifted the tides of the war!
In order to change history so that the Confederacy wins the Civil War, I would kill two influential people to the Union cause: Joshua L. Chamberlain and Ulysses S. Grant. I would make sure that Chamberlain was killed during in combat on Little Round Top during Gettysburg before he called for the swinging gate maneuver. If Chamberlain was unable to initiate the swinging gate maneuver that led to a Confederate defeat on Little Round Top, then the Confederates would have eventually overtaken the outgunned Union troops. By securing Little Round Top, The Confederates would have the perfect vantage point to attack and fire on the Union army, and such casualties could have led to a Confederate victory at Gettysburg.
Sherman had went to Ulysses S. Grant, his friend. After all this happened Sherman had got permission. Sherman had got all his 60,000 troops together and told them the rules of the march. He had separated the troops into like a pair of wings. There was a left and a right side.
General McClellan made the South flee causing the Union to win another battle. In Mississippi General Grant led another battle to victory with the surrender of the Confederacy. General Sherman led the Union army in Savannah and destroyed the cities and broke the spirit of the Confederacy. This was another victory. The final battle of the Civil War was led by President Lincoln.
The generals that directed the war for both sides had a great effect on how the turning points were to come about during the latter parts of the Civil War. Lee of the South was bound to make more rash and direct decisions for his armies due to the lack of resources for his military, while Mcclellan was more of a strategist waiting for the opposition to make a move first most of the time (Donald 50). Also, many of the generals of the North had continued to grow, while the South stayed the same for the most part, which was eventually the downfall of the South when it came to the turning points of the war (Donald 53). This helped expose the lack of battle strategies for the South that helped them ultimately lose the war due to this turning point. The battle of Antietam showed the point of the war where the North was grasping the advantages it needed to start to turn the tides of the war in their favor.
In an interview, a Confederate soldier says, "Johnston 's strategy was to take a strong defensive position and waiting for the enemy to attack." On the other side, a Union soldier said, "Sherman
