ipl-logo

Why Did The Confederacy Win The Civil War

923 Words4 Pages

In order to change history so that the Confederacy wins the Civil War, I would kill two influential people to the Union cause: Joshua L. Chamberlain and Ulysses S. Grant. I would make sure that Chamberlain was killed during in combat on Little Round Top during Gettysburg before he called for the swinging gate maneuver. If Chamberlain was unable to initiate the swinging gate maneuver that led to a Confederate defeat on Little Round Top, then the Confederates would have eventually overtaken the outgunned Union troops. By securing Little Round Top, The Confederates would have the perfect vantage point to attack and fire on the Union army, and such casualties could have led to a Confederate victory at Gettysburg. Grant’s death would also be a huge blow to the Union. If Grant had died before he captured Fort Donelson, then most likely the fort would not have been lost to the Union. The downfall of Fort Donelson opened up Kentucky and Tennessee for Union advances. If the Confederacy had been able to secure Fort Donelson, it would have been much more difficult for the Union to control Kentucky and Tennessee, and might have delayed or even stopped Union control of the West. Grant’s leadership led to the fall of Vicksburg and Petersburg, and his aggressive tactics caused mass casualties for the Confederacy during the battles of Cold Harbor, Chattanooga, …show more content…

The National Banking Act strengthened the Union economy and funded the war. It stabilized the Union economy by creating a centralized banking system, and successfully funded the war by decreasing federal debt and reducing inflation. If the National Banking Act had not been enacted, then the Union would not have had so much economic support for the war. Since the Confederacy’s strategy was to outlast the Union, they would have had better success if the Union did not have the strong economy and funding created by the National Banking

Show More
Related
189 Words | 1 Pages

Another way he helped the outcome of the war is by winning at Vicksburg and Petersburg. One confederate leader was General George Pickett. He helped the course of the war by leading “15,000 men in a daring charge against the center of the union line” (Stoff 506). This was known as Pickett’s charge but it was an easy win for the union. To get to the union army “Pickett’s men would have to march 1,000 yards across

Read More
394 Words | 2 Pages

Generals on both sides of the Civil War used different military strategies and tactics commanded their troops. Generals Ulyssess S. Grant and William T. Sherman both had different strategies and tactics and their strategies and tactics differed from traditional military practices. Ulyssess S. Grant wanted to use two main military strategies to win the war. First, he wanted to combine military efforts. In order to cut the Confederates off from directing their forces at one place they wanted them to have to split their numbers.

Read More
1639 Words | 7 Pages

General Ulysses S. Grant had a great impact on the United States both in his time as a war general and in his time as president. His role in the Civil War was instrumental to the Union victory and the strategies he employed saved many union troops and ended the war quickly. He had many wins, but also many losses and setbacks that were devastating. He learned and adapted through those setbacks and won the war and the American public. The United States would have had a much harder time winning the war and with recovery efforts afterward were it not for General Grant.

Read More
310 Words | 2 Pages

However, his attempt was unsuccessful because the confederates lost and were now outnumbered. (Document A) This is why geography contributed to Gettysburg being a game changer in the Civil War.

Read More
569 Words | 3 Pages

The Confederates used a sneak attack and surprised the Union which put the Confederates at an advantage. Their advantage led to a disadvantageous battle for the Union. Unfortunately, Grant made it out worse for wear. When asked to remove him from his position, President Lincoln declined the publics' *who?demands, only stating that he couldn’t let Grant go because he fought. Lincoln could see that Grant was a fighter and a leader, and in times of war, that's a crucial necessity to have.

Read More
1214 Words | 5 Pages

The Civil War was fought by some of the most tactical minds the United States at that time. One such man was the Confederate general Robert E. Lee. Mr. Lee is arguably one of the most cunning leaders to have ever fought with or against the United States. Robert E. Lee was given limited men, limited supplies, and limited equipment to wage war against the Union (a military superpower at the time) and was able to drag the war out much longer than it ever should’ve lasted. Lee’s home life and childhood beginnings are what shaped him into the military mastermind he quickly became.

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

Grant’s counterattacks had payed off, it devastated the confederate troops. Many of Grants piers did not like the way he led, but there were also people who admired Grants style, one of his admirers was President Abraham Lincoln. President Lincoln liked the way he fought fearlessly, Lincoln even said “I can’t spare this man, he fights.” Lincoln’s admiration for Grant would lead to him putting Grant in charge of the entire Union

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

Who won really won the civil war? Who benefitted the most after, who came out on top, and who achieved what they wanted to? Some may argue that in war there are no winners, but the North definitively came out on top after the civil war. Coming out of the war the North had a stable economy, more political power, had united the country, and ended slavery. Coming out of the war the South’s economy was in shambles, they failed to succeed from the Union, their free labor was gone, their agricultural land was destroyed, and they had to rebuild.

Read More
1551 Words | 7 Pages

On that day, he took control of the Union troops and developed a strategy to finally defeat the Confederates and save the Union. Grant’s strategy was to destroy the South’s resources and men, and their will to continue fighting. He was an experienced military leader, and was trusted by the public and his troops. Once Grant was promoted to Lieutenant General by Lincoln, the next steps were entirely up to Grant. Lincoln had great trust in Grant to achieve the Union’s goals.

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

The Union, that was under Abraham Lincoln, keep the Northern states together and able to operate better. They were able to function as a whole unit rather than separate states like the south had done. By having this, they were able to keep their government together and on the same page. The South wasn’t able to function as a

Read More
909 Words | 4 Pages

The Civil War was a monumental bloodshed, which was fought between the United States of America and the Confederate States, from 1861 to 1865. The primary cause of the war was the Southern states' desire to preserve the institution of slavery, which did not please the beliefs of the North. At the beginning of the Civil War, twenty-two million people lived in the North and 9 million people, which included four million of whom were slaves, lived in the South. The North, led by President Abraham Lincoln and his trusted generals, had more money, more factories, more horses, more railroads, and more food than the south. These advantages made the United States much more powerful than the Confederate States, which ultimately led to Northern victory.

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

Lincoln’s plan was to bring the nation together and stop the fighting. Along with Lincoln there were other great commanders by his side. General McDowell led the second battle of the Civil War making the North realize this wasn’t going to be an easy battle to win. General Grant led the Union to a victory and the capture of the first Confederate capital. General Sherman led the Union to another victory and ended the Confederacy control on the Mississippi Valley.

Read More
889 Words | 4 Pages

The Civil War was a time of great change and strife for America. The Union was making an effort to stomp out the last of the rebellion the Confederates had created. In one of the first major battles of the Civil War, the Battle of Chancellorsville, a surprising outcome occurred and allowed for a change in the morale of the Confederates. Major General Joseph Hooker of the Union and General Robert E. Lee of the Confederates were both fighting to gain initiative and morale for their soldiers. The leader of the Confederates; General Robert E. Lee, fought for rights for the Southern States.

Read More
1037 Words | 5 Pages

If the south would have won key battles the outcome of the war would have changed. Second, the short-term impacts of the civil war would have changed. African-Americans would still be slaves, and Americans lives would have shifted. Also, the long-term impacts of the civil war would have been different. The leadership of the U.S would have changed, and our government system would have changed too.

Read More
1136 Words | 5 Pages

To destroy the confederacy and make the south rejoin the union, extreme legal measures such as passing amendments needed to be taken by the government to affirm Union’s power over the south. The government also successfully being able to pass these amendments created a less discriminatory society and helped the south ease their beliefs on slavery, so that it could be easier for them to reunite with the

Read More

More about Why Did The Confederacy Win The Civil War

Related Topics

Open Document