In their journal “The Case of Paying College Athletes”, John Siegfried and Allen Sanderson point out many discrepancies in NCAA policies, but do not support monetary payment. They argue: “College athletes are in fact currently paid, in the sense that the majority receive grants-in-aid that cover most – although not all – of their college expenses.” (Pg. 127). After this statement, the authors detail the demanding payments varying depending on each college
Most high school athletes across America share one common aspiration: play their sport at the next level in college. For a select number of fortunate athletes, that dream becomes a reality when they commit to a school and sign their letter of intent. But are they really fortunate? College athletics are oftentimes not as glamorous as one would think. The transition to college is not a walk in the park, but add a rigorous summer conditioning program, two-a-days everyday, and the pressures of coaches you have yet to impress, and you have a recipe for disaster.
And that is a privilege, not an occupation” (Murphy par. 11). Even though Hartnett states that “a scholarship doesn’t equal cash in a player’s pocket” and also that “even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke” (Hartnett par. 9), those athletes willingly decided to accept the scholarship that was offered to them, knowing what they would be getting into. Becoming a college athlete was a decision that the athlete made on their own, knowing the consequences, and accepting
As we all know, college can be very expensive. With the scholarships and grants, college student-athletes can go to school for free and get their day-to-day needs such as food, housing, clothes, etc. Ackerman and Scotts, purpose is to show that college is a learning experience and with the help of college sports, the student-athletes will have a chance to grow and be successful in life rather than being exploited. However, critics believe that college student-athletes should be paid salary, like professional athletes, because they want people to see the “athletes are the rule, not the expectation” (par 11). They want the audience to think that it’s a rule for student-athletes to go play pro after two years, will no expectation.
This means that in many cases student athletes are so focused in keeping their scholarship that they completely forget about their academics and in some
Caelan Stebelton Professor Longman English 1201 4 May 2017 Why College Athletes Should Be Paid, and How The NCAA Can Do That High level college sports such as basketball and football dominate television networks across the country throughout the fall and winter. The stars of the team often become household names, with jerseys and memorabilia sold all over the world. The National Collegiate Athletic Association, better known as the NCAA, rakes in hundreds of millions of dollars each year, with the universities and coaches receiving millions as well. However, the athletes that entertain millions of fans each year do not receive a dime, their only form of payment is the scholarships they receive from the university. In fact, collegiate athletes
Scholarships granted to student athletes cover tuition, fees, room, board and textbooks, according to the National Collegiate Athletic Association website. Some athletes receive scholarships that cover only a portion of these expenses, but many of these student athletes still receive more aid than the average ordinary student. Many student athletes have most everything provided for them in college, giving them a clear advantage over their fellow non sport playing students. For non-athlete students, the experiences of an unpaid internship does not come along with a full-ride scholarship unlike playing a sport and competing doing what they love. ” These athletes are receiving a college education in return for their skills in sports" (Horace 1).
College sports are a major part of American culture. College athletes devote hours upon hours a week to their sports training, but unfortunately, sports can take up a lot of time and distract from other important activities. This can harm academics, as athletes have to balance sports and academics, especially at a college. Participating in sports is almost like working a part-time job and having to balance school too which can be difficult to do, and focus may be rendered on one task and not both. Furthermore, athletes will be on scholarships too, which is why college athletes should not be paid.
College athletes are not receiving a physical paycheck; instead they are receiving a scholarship that is worth much
The athletes play a role in the promotion of the team, but do not benefit from doing so. The NCAA and colleges make profit from the athlete’s ability to perform their sport well and please the
Furthermore, proponents will argue that college athletic programs spend tons of money on state-of-the-art resources to help athlete-students to meet their graduation requirements (NCAA n.p.). I am in agreement with proponents regarding athlete-students receiving a free education and tons of free academic support and other resources. However, college athletes with too many academic challenges are enrolled in colleges by way of relaxed admission and academic standards are still faced with the difficulty of surviving the rigors of college.
It has been consistenly proven that pay can greatly increase one’s desire to improve. In a way, this is seen throughout the workplace. Employees will try everything in their power to gain a higher pay rate, which is how a collegiate athlete would also most likely perform if paid. At the end of the day student-athletes need to ask themselves why they would truly like to attend
The argument made by these two professors state that Division 1 players qualify as employees under Federal Labor Laws. Since players are under this law, the McCormick’s feel players should get financially compensated due to the physical rigors and balance education simultaneously (Cooper, 2011). It’s unbelievable how this couple thinks Division 1 athletes should get paid. The privilege to attend a university that is costly on full scholarship should be more than enough. Furthermore, student-athletes received stipends as an allowance assist with their livelihood.
If they have failing grades as well, the colleges are sending their students into the world without a real chance at becoming professional athletes, and without an actual education. In the end, they will be left unprepared for life. My first reason I believe athletes with bad grades shouldn’t play sports
A growing debate in the National Collegiate Athletic Association is whether or not student athletes should be paid. The controversy began in 2011 after three hundred coaches and athletes signed a petition to pay college-level athletes, and since then other athletes have made several more arguments. The NCAA has rightfully denied all of the requests, saying they include too much. To pay student athletes could be hugely expensive for colleges, especially because they would not only pay for each athlete’s degree and equipment, but also provide a salary and give bonuses revenue for tournaments. Moreover, college athletes should not be paid because there is not enough money, it takes away a student’s focus from schoolwork, and not every athlete is guaranteed a professional career after graduating; however it is argued that it they are already paid in a way.
