ipl-logo

CRISPR And Its Impact On Society

1287 Words6 Pages

109276 EuDaly 2B
CRISPRs

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) carries an organism’s genetic material. DNA is inherited from two parents and passed on to offspring. This genetic material makes up the components that construction an organism. The sequence of DNA base pairs determines the traits the offspring will inherit. DNA is responsible for the creation of every protein in the human body. Occasionally, there is a mutation in this DNA sequence which results in disease. The use of CRISPR will positively impact society by allowing the elimination and cure of DNA mutation diseases, which outweighs the social opposition of the permanent alteration of the human genome.
CRISPR- Cas9 is a genome editing tool. The human genome consists of 23 chromosomes that …show more content…

An ethical implication of the use of CRISPR is that the change made to the gene will be passed on between multiple generations. Therefore, there is lasting consequence in the family. The technology can alter the human genome. However, this alteration is beneficial as DNA mutation diseases can be eliminated which will positively impact society by allowing a higher quality of life to those who would have suffered the disease. (yourgenome, 2017) The other ethical controversy of CRISPR is designer babies. The technology could be used in reproductive cells. Thus, parents would be able to alter their gametes in order to create a child with traits they want their child to have. For example, parents with brown eyes who viewed blue eyes as better for their child the technology makes this possible by editing the DNA in chromosome 19. The concern of this is that humankind will lose variety. The removal of diseases and the selection of traits is a social concern of the use of CRISPR. For these reasons the technology is currently illegal in countries such as the United Kingdom. However, in America these social concerns should not eliminate the technology’s use in society. Instead, the technology should be implemented only to cure diseases. Due to the worry of designer babies CRISPR should not be allowed to edit a human gamete. However, CRISPR use in the cure of genetic diseases would be for the good of society. Diseases which decrease the …show more content…

This allows for the cure of DNA mutation diseases, along with elimination of diseases from the human species. The opposition of CRISPR’s use states that technology is risky, will permanently change the human genome, and open the path of designer babies. The risk of CRISPR is minimal. Thus, the lives saved will for the greater good will outweigh the possible side effects. The worry of altering the genome can be viewed as not an issue as the elimination of diseases will increase the quality of life for people. And the use of designer babies can be eradicated by not allowing the technology to be used in gametes. Therefore, the use of CRISPR should be introduced into humanity to allow for an increased life quality of those who suffer from DNA

Show More
Related
850 Words | 4 Pages

CRISPR makes it easy to “turn off” a specific gene at a time to see what it does, and it can introduce mutations to treat cancer or find out if people are predisposed to things such as obesity and diabetes. Michael Page uses rhetorical devices such as ethos, logos and pathos to elucidate the pros and cons of genetically

Read More
959 Words | 4 Pages

As an article from Popular Science says, CRISPR is the method used “to remove genes from an early stage embryo” (Chodosh). Although there is still not a one hundred percent guarantee that the DNA or gene can be removed from all the cells, it is still a successful and promising technique. At first glance it might seem inhumane to take or manipulate genes, the article says that “…the most useful genes to edit would be those for serious genetic diseases” (Chodosh). In other words, this could save thousands of babies from being sick or disabled for the rest of their lives. However, having the ability to manipulate genes also lends the opportunity of changing DNA to create designer babies.

Read More
1824 Words | 8 Pages

Designer genetics to create a baby after careful selection is a meme, and “we can say that memes are ‘selfish’, that they ‘do not care’, that they ‘want’ to propagate themselves, and so on, when all we mean is that successful memes are the ones that get copied and spread, while unsuccessful ones do not” (Blackmore 37), and some may consider this genetic modification to be a successful meme which is why parents are so willing to try it. By using technology in this type of way, it may possibly benefit some if it is spread for good causes, such as helping a baby be born without a disease that is known to run in the family so the parents won’t have to see their child go through pain. Many parents put their faith in “23andMe” and their technology because it is their last hope to be able to conceive a child without them having to worry about any debilitating disease or disabilities and since this procedure would be implicated even before the child is developed, there would be no questions of morality. However, some people might take advantage of this new technology and use it for nothing more than creating their fantasy child, as they start to choose non-health related traits such as weight, height, gender and eye color.

Read More
1791 Words | 8 Pages

Aside from the authority that results from being published in a peer-reviewed journal, Gert writes in a rather serious and academic tone to prevent the reader from taking his words too lightly. By calling attention to the fact that “we do not know that there are no risks,” Gert’s argument transcends all limitations and fosters a creeping feeling of uncertainty and fear. In some aspects, opting to argue the general possibility of negative side effects of genetic engineering rather than naming specific possibilities enhances his argument as the

Read More
1136 Words | 5 Pages

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) Today i’m here to talk to you about crispr “what's crispr” you might ask you also might ask “why does it have no E its triggering my ocd” and my answer is well too bad because i say that word about fifty times in this essay so what does crisper stand for it stands for Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and is super annoying to type so i’m not going to do that any more but I AM going to tell you about how crispr should be banned i mean anywhere just BANNED Crispr is a form of genome mutation first found in small ecoli bacterium if the cell was attacked and somehow managed to survive crispr would grab some of the virus and fuse it with its DNA and RNA. This is essentially a mug shot of the virus and if it ever attacks again the cell calls the proteins and tells them to terminate anything

Read More
948 Words | 4 Pages

Some argue that recent developments in gene editing could lead to significant medical advancements. These developments such as, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR), “which allows researchers to generate RNA-guided nucleases,

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

In 2012, a revolutionary breakthrough was created that would forever change the fate of the human race. It is known as CRISPR. Developed at the University of California, Berkeley, CRISPR has the ability to permanently alter human genes, and it does so through the use of an enzyme called Cas9, which allows target genes to be cut out and/or replaced. However, despite its promising capabilities, people still have their doubts. Nonetheless, looking into the future, scientists are now looking into the “Jurassic Park” experiment.

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

The issue of modification through gene manipulation becomes increasingly complex when considering how this technology can be used as a means to unethical and harmful uses. In the article, Babies with Genes From 3 people could be Ethical, Panel Says, Rob Stein exposes various concerns about three gene donors in an embryo, including how a scientist, “Could introduce some new disease into the human gene pool or that scientists could try to do this for other reasons-nonmedical reasons, like create designer babies where parents pick the traits of their children.” Stein goes on to explain how the gene replacement procedure would take place, which continues to usher in a plethora of concerns as whether to allow Crispr technology be tested on a embryo.

Read More
866 Words | 4 Pages

CRISPR gets a species related to the species that has gone extinct and then the genetically modify it. The end result of CRISPR is a species close to what it was but not completely the same. CRISPR is also cheaper than it was before, wich is great if we want to revive multiple species. The article Bringing extinct species back from the dead could hurt—not help—conservation efforts states, “The cost of caring for a population of resurrected mammoths, for instance, should be similar to the cost of caring for the endangered Asian elephant.” Nevertheless, there are downsides to De-extinction.

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

People think that this will make the next generation perfect, this is not entirely true. If every single person in the world was perfect, technically no one would be perfect. No one would be perfect because everyone would be the same, which kills the strive for something even better, perfection. Also, scientists say that this can cure all diseases by removing a certain gene. Scientists actually could remove a gene which causes disease, but this could end up introducing a new, more powerful disease to the body.

Read More
1247 Words | 5 Pages

This procedure’s purpose is to switch out genes for more preferred ones, especially to improve the health of the child. Genetic engineering could permit selection of desired physical and pleasurable traits for non-medical reasons, which has created concern in some people. The process of switching out the genes of a fetus to install genes that are more preferred has brought up debate about whether or not parents should be able to alter their babies genes to make them more appealing to the parents interests. There are many different ways of looking at this procedure and in contrast to other scientific procedures it can be for greater good or for unnecessary enhancement that could potentially create problems in society. Designer babies aren’t morally correct or incorrect, but are in between depending on what it is being used for.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

Cancer, heart disease, blood disorders, nerve disorders, and many more genetic diseases are affecting millions of people around the world. The more society advances, the more degenerate diseases are affecting the citizens. For a number of years researchers have been searching for cures. With new developments in gene editing, treatments for many diseases are just around the corner. Gene editing with new technology, CRISPR, matches with a specific gene and splits the protein.

Read More
456 Words | 2 Pages

Mutation in children is not uncommon and it has caused many children to be robbed of the chances that healthy children are born with. A parent blessed with the gift of a healthy child wouldn’t be able to understand the relief genetic engineering would be able to bring to parents of children born with haemophilia, cystic fibrosis, or muscular dystrophy. Not only would choosing the best traits in an organism be good for humans, but for animals and plants. As previously mentioned, plants would benefit in the sense that they will be able to get immunity to pests and their own types of diseases. Animals would be able to make their prime state by modifying their DNA.

Read More
1370 Words | 6 Pages

Editing of the human genome in the past has been only a sight seen in dystopia works such as Brave New World. Now, genetic enhancement is a prevalent today and people are beginning to realize the issues that can arise from creating these designer babies. Gene editing can be helpful to eradicate life changing disabilities. Yet, the term disability does not correctly label these differently abled people, as the idea of what is considered disabled has changed overtime. To fully understand the consequences and implications of genetic selection and enhancement of human embryos, society must mature and declare lines of what is and is not ethically moral.

Read More
862 Words | 4 Pages

The procedure putting another extra clone gene to the mom’s womb and growing is not easy and sometimes it can cause moms and the child 's death. Because we want a clone baby doesn’t mean we want to kill the moms so it is irrelevant and hazardous. Peoples want to believe that we shouldn 't be afraid of cloning babies or having engineered baby, but however people connected to their religion and didn’t want to mess with their god(religion) so because of that most of the people didn’t want to accept this technology. As seen in the (Caplan’s) article, scientists are using CRISPR CAS9 to make a new engineered baby. This tool helps to edit genes in animals and insects and now it also works on human to modify their genes and to enter the new gene to make clone babies.the intriguing instance of genetic modification was that there is a lot of controversies and agreements in human cloning.

Read More

More about CRISPR And Its Impact On Society

Related Topics

Open Document