More handpicked essays just for you.
The Tragic Elements On William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
Example ethos in tragedy of julius caesar
Tragic elements in julius caesar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Shakespeare exposes the cutthroat politics of Rome through the speeches of Brutus and Antony in his play Julius Caesar. This play epitomizes the benefits of using rhetorical devices in a persuasive speech. Antony applies the modes ethos, logos, and pathos to establish credibility, provide evidence, and evoke emotion throughout his eulogy to Caesar. Preceding Antony’s speech was that of the senator, and friend of Caesar, Brutus. Conclusively, Antony’s use of rhetorical devices surpasses Brutus’s; Antony successfully persuades the crowd that Brutus’s speech posed as a clever ruse to justify his cold-blooded murder.
In Julius Caesar, both Antony and Brutus delivered languishing speeches using rhetorical devices to attract the audience and persuade the crowd that their opinions were correct and logical. Marcus Brutus used more of a scare tactic and threatened the people of Rome to challenge him. Mark Antony used more of a sentimental and emotional technique to appeal to the vulnerable audience. He speaks to the crowd, rather than above it as Brutus does in his lofty speech of honor. Mark Antony presented the more rhetorically effective speech using the vulnerability of the Roman citizen’s feelings and the techniques of pathos, plain folk, bandwagon and reverse psychology.
Between the two speeches given by Brutus and Marc Antony, Antony had the stronger speech. This is due to his effective use of the rhetorical devices ethos, pathos and logos, but most importantly his use of logos. Antony was the second to speak therefore being able to rebuttal most of what Brutus said. Antony uses logos very effectively when stating the actions of Caesar. “He hath brought many captives home to Rome whose ransoms did the general coffers fill.”
Brutus and Antony are the most predominant characters in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare. In act three Antony and Brutus give a very important speech to the people of rome in which the plebeians get to see their personality. In their speech they both engage one of the three Classical appeals: logos, an appeal to logic; ethos, an appeal to character; pathos which is an appeal to emotion. Although both speeches are similar in structure Antony’s speech is more effective because he wins over the plebeians, gets them to turn on noble Brutus and builds an army. Antony doesn’t have it great to begin.
In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare , Brutus and Antony both have different ways of getting the people’s attention through their speeches. Brutus and Antony appeal to ethos, logos, and pathos. Both use them differently to manipulate the people. Brutus uses them to confuse the people to justify the killing of Caesar. Antony uses them to take advantage of the plebeians and turn them against Brutus.
The play, “Julius Caesar” was written by the infamous, William Shakespeare. In this play Brutus, Julius’s assassinator, and Marc Antony, one of Julius’s good friends, give a speech-after Julius Caesar's abrupt death-to persuade the Roman citizens on Caesar's death. Marc Antony's speech was the most persuasive, because he used the most effective literary techniques and appeals. To begin with, Marc Antony used literary techniques called, pathos and ethos, to strengthen his argument against Brutus. Pathos is used to persuade an audience with emotion, while ethos is used to persuade an audience with credibility.
In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony both used different techniques in order to capture the audience's attention and approval in their speeches about Caesar's death. They both include repetition, rhetorical strategies, dramatic pauses, and parallelism in order to get the crowd on their sides. Both men use different strategies by knowing the audience and they use this to their advantage. Brutus and Antony both choose the use of Pathos and Ethos specifically appeal to the audience and their love for their country.
Persuasion is a big part of the speeches and there is a lot of jelousy and greed. Greed leads people to jelousy and that is never a good thing to happen. Jelousy can lead people to do things they usually wouldn’t do. Persuasion is used a lot to convince people to believe in what they are saying. Although Brutus used a lot of good reasonings involving pathos, Antony delivers the more effective speech because he knew Caesar more and he was much closer to him
Life is a never ending game, each situation is a new level. In order to be successful in life, you must follow the rules or else there will be consequences. Ray Bradbury’s, “A Sound Of Thunder” is about a company called Time Safari INC. which allows people to travel back into time and go on a hunting safari. Eckels, a man who is about to embark on this safari journey seems a bit odd from the beginning. Time Safari INC, has extremely specific rules and once you break one of these rules, your life will be on the line.
In Julius Caesar, Brutus delivered a more persuasive speech compared to Marc Antony. He uses certain rhetorical techniques to make the audience understand where he’s coming from. He uses pathos to target emotion in his feelings towards caesar. He says, ” I did love Caesar, but I loved Rome more”. His love for his best friend was not like it should be.
Marc Antony, a character in William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar, uses ethos, pathos, and logos to persuade the audience in his funeral speech. To establish ethos, or his credibility as a speaker, Antony reminds the audience of his close relationship with Caesar. He says, "I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him" (III.ii.79). This suggests that Antony is an unbiased witness and that the audience should trust him because he has nothing to gain by speaking. Additionally, Antony establishes his ethos by reminding the audience that he was a friend of Caesar and that they should trust him because of this relationship.
In Brutus’s speech, he puts more weight on logos and ethos when orating to the commoners. Antony emphasizes an appeal to the emotions of the plebeians by referring to Caesar’s body, cloak, and will. He was also successful in counteracting Brutus’s claim of Caesar being too ambitious to be king of Rome. When Brutus is speaking, he takes a more logical route to attempt to persuade the people into believing his story.
Worried that the crowd had been completely convinced by Brutus’s words, Antony had to persuade them to be on his side, so he began his speech by appealing to their emotions or pathos. He begins his speech by calling them “Friends, Romans, Countrymen”. Being classified as his friends, Romans, and countrymen is a compliment to most people, and appeals to their emotions by feeling as if you have a strong bond with one another. By showing them that he has a bond with them, he is showing them he is not there to change their mind, but instead to talk to them as the “friends” that they are. Later, he uses empathy by telling the crowd, “You are not wood, you are not stones, but men;”.
Rhetoric in the Speeches of Brutus and Antony The death of Caesar is a controversial topic and was even more controversial at the time of his funeral when when senators were trying to benefit from his death by getting the Roman citizens on their side. At Caesar’s funeral, two senators gave speeches as an attempt to get the roman people on their side. Out of the two speeches, Marc Antony’s speech was more effective because of his use of appeals and biases, being 100% true and had a larger variety of rhetorical devices.
In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar one of the main characters Caesar is killed in Scene 3 act 2.Then Brutus and Antony both give speeches about how bad they feel. Brutus gives a good speech by using all three of the rhetorical appeals to persuade the crowd to want to listen to what he say by using logos,ethos,pathos to his advantage. Brutus gives a better speech that draws the audience attention,Antony not as much. Therefor here are some very valid points on why Brutus’s speech used the Rhetorical Appeals better.
