Water is the most important resource in the world. Without water, we would not be able to thrive. Water is essential for farming, businesses, and the general public. Florida, Georgia, and Alabama have been in a two-decade long argument over water use because it has been negatively impacting states’ communities. In the article, How the Florida-Georgia Water Fight Could Affect Atlanta, Molly Samuel discusses the water sources that are being fought over and the impacts these water sources have on the communities. Samuel appeals to the topic by addressing ethos, pathos, and logos and further investigates the government’s stance in the water war and presents the consequences communities are facing. The two-decade long argument over water has …show more content…
Florida requests that Georgia should have a cap on how much water they can use from the ACF Basin. Atlanta has a growing population and capping the water would cause severe problems throughout Georgia’s economy. Metro Atlanta Chamber chief economist, Tom Cunningham stated, “You would actually have to see large numbers of people leave” (Samuel). The author appeals to ethos by quoting a credible economist directly affected by the water wars. This allows the reader to consider the impact of capping Atlanta’s water. In addition, if the water is capped in Georgia the agriculture productivity will be directly affected. These impacts would cause a statewide issue since agriculture is a huge part of Georgia’s economy. Doug Miell, energy and natural resources advisor stated, “This is a statewide issue…[Agriculture] is one of the state’s largest economic drivers” (Samuel). The author appeals to ethos and pathos by using the credibility of a Georgia natural and energy resource advisor and by making the reader fear an economic disaster. The water wars have negatively affected the communities of Florida and Georgia. Water is important to both of the states. “Both states should be able to grow, have strong economies, have clean water supplies, and have a healthy river system” (Samuel). Samuel appeals to logos and pathos by making the reader consider the options of how to fairly distribute water because everyone should have the water they need. The states need to compromise and conserve water more efficiently to ensure the future of their water