ipl-logo

How Was Julius Caesar Ruthless

523 Words3 Pages

There is controversy amongst historians and educators as to whether Caligula (born Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus Germanicus) was ruthless, crazy, or misunderstood. In his position as Emperor of the Roman Empire he was considered and depicted as being unpredictable and cruel. He would seemingly order anyone who crossed him to be murdered; he seemingly enjoyed torturing people; acknowledged himself as a God; restored treason trials; and caused many problems for Rome as a result of his excessive spending on public shows, entertainment, games, and Roman treasures which it is said almost sent the Empire into bankruptcy. There are numerous hypotheses from numerous historians as to whether he was just rebellious or ruthless, driven to madness due to past tragedies in his life, or suffered a mental illness that led him to being an unreliable, extravagant and sadistic ruler. …show more content…

Caligula was assassinated 24 January AD 41 after being in power for 3 years and 10 months. He was the son of Germanicus (ruler of the German campaign) and Agrippina who was the granddaughter of the Emperor Augustus. After his father was assassinated and the rest of his family were accused of treason and either died or banished sent in exile, Caligula was sent to live with his uncle Tiberius, Emperor of Rome. In 37 AD, Tiberius passed away and the role of emperor fell into his hands. He automatically became popular and well liked by the public as he was the son of Germanicus, contained the blood of Augustus in his veins, and was a welcome change from the previous emperor Tiberius who was a brooding and unpopular

Show More
Related
183 Words | 1 Pages

Tiberius was succeeded by his adopted son Caligula, Augustus' great-grandson. Claudius was de facto the first Roman Emperor from the Julio-Claudian dynasty because he was the first to descend from both families. Claudius had a male heir - Britannicus but he adopted Nero, son of his wife Agrippina

Read More
1009 Words | 5 Pages

Rodgers recalls the moments when Caligula ascended to the status of emperor: “When Augustus’ great-grandson Gaius Cligula succeeded Tiberius in March AD37, Rome was jubilant” (source D). Unfortunately, Caligula is became most associated with his inexplicable acts of lunacy. It is widely suggested by modern historians that a rapid alteration in his mental health took place as a result of some form of mental disorder, namely schizophrenia. Regardless of this, he was still recognised as having moments of good-naturedness and open-heartedness. The nickname he earned as a child, ‘little boots’ since stuck with him his whole life, and it became the name Rome knew him by, further adding to the credibility of his

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

He was also was a very bad man. He would kill all people that would disagree with him, was a terrible leader, and weak. He was a terrible leader because he was not going to go to the traditional race at the festival of Lupercal. The only reason he was not going to go is because a soothsayer told him to beware the ides of March, March fifteenth to be specific. Julius Caesar is a man that the conspirators would consider a bad man.

Read More
1066 Words | 5 Pages

In contrast to Caligula’s reason of madness in the case of Nero there was no sign of reason only that he as well suffered from a mental ailment in more ways than one the illness was a family trait since, yet Nero’s actions were to differ from Caligula in persecution of Christians, the endless depraved sexual encounters with both gender and lastly the way he governed showed that he loved the arts, and the theater thus giving the history some art works as well for coins. Covering the way his rule was not his own but his mother’s and tutors when they were gone, and he was clear to rule he killed or divorced his wives, but his actions always effected the Roman empire. In particular in 64 A.D, the Great Fire that set Rome ablaze for six days a historian Tacitus the saw four districts of the city burn in stating, “The city four were undamaged, three were destroyed and in the seven

Read More
1202 Words | 5 Pages

Although Tiberius did not care too much for Caligula, he hired scholars to teach Caligula all manner of imperial subjects (Lattanzi). Caligula 's career began in 31 AD, when he held public office, and continued until 33 AD. He was declared emperor in 37 AD at age 24 (¨Caligula Biography¨). His rule, for the first month 's, painted him as a generous and benevolent ruler. He freed political prisoners kept by Tiberius and Livia during their rule.

Read More
296 Words | 2 Pages

Nero was the most infamous emperor of Rome. Nero was very brutal he had his mother (Agrippina), his first wife (Octavia) and his second wife (Poppaea Sabina) murdered. Nero also had senators murdered if they question his actions. One of the most infamous events of his reign was the fire of Rome in 64 AD Nero was in Antium when the fire started in the Circus Maximus. The fire spread and raged furiously over Rome for nine days.

Read More
567 Words | 3 Pages

Gaius Caesar, who is also known as Caligula was born on August 31. It is said that he was born in either Tibur or the village of Ambitarvium, however he claims Antium (Penguin Classics, 2007, pg. 149). Gaius Caesar was described as a tall man, with a large build, yet weak body and very hairy. For Gaius Caesar to keep his power over Rome, he used cruelty, bribery and the sexual exploitation of others. He was said to be a very cruel person and enjoyed during cruel things.

Read More
621 Words | 3 Pages

From the beginning of our existence, humans have dreamt of flying. Laboriously toiling, we try to accomplish our fantasies of flight, only to often result in failure, like Icarus flying too close to the sun. Since the mythical tale of Icarus, humankind as a species, have done many amazing feats, as well as not doing as great as we could have because of our own overload of ambition, which leads to the question; ‘Was Icarus a hero or a failure?’. Icarus was a failure; after meticulously working on sets of wings forged out of seemingly impossible building material, Daedalus and Icarus himself had finally achieved freedom from the labyrinth, but Icarus proceeded to ignore his father’s wishes, letting his own wants get the best of him, and he ultimately, drowned in the sea because of his lack of planning and carelessness. Icarus’s failure to channel his inner restraint and ambition will be compared to other famous figures in literature, including Julius Caesar, Don Quixote and Amy Tan.

Read More
896 Words | 4 Pages

This discursive analysis will centre around Caesar’s position in history through a focus on his characteristics as exhibited in sources. His appeal as a fascinating historical character through his ambitious nature and popularity amongst the people will first be examined, followed by a discussion on how Caesar achieved his prominent position in history resulting from his contributions

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

Again, some emperors were good, and even great, but some were bad, very bad. Some of the worst emperors in Ancient Rome’s history were Commodus, Nero, and Caligula. These rulers are considered as some of the worst emperors Ancient Rome had to offer. However, Caligula is the worst emperor in all of Ancient

Read More
1438 Words | 6 Pages

The Reformation of the Catholic Church was a major turning point in the history of the Catholic Church. The Reformation means “to change”. In the 16th Century the Catholic Church was the dominating religion in the world. The Reformation was the changing or alteration of specific practices of the Catholic Church. It was also called the Protestant Reformation because of how the Protestant Churches emerged as a result of the Reformation.

Read More
334 Words | 2 Pages

According to Brutus, Caesar is like a serpent's egg because now that he was granted a lot of power, Brutus fears that someday Caesar will abuse the power like most people tends to do, so he's planning on to kill Caesar now to prevent it from happening. Decius convinces Caesar to attend the Senate by reinterpret Calpurnia's dream from bad to good, and he tells Caesar that the people of Rome are planning to give the crown to him on that day, so if Caesar said that he's not attending, the senate might change their minds. I think that Shakespeare is portraying an image of Caesar as a sympathetic, because Shakespeare talks a lot about Caesar's family- Caesar's wife,his seizures, and how Brutus is planning to betray Caesar; it implies the compassion

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

Caesar had his flaws, but he was only human. Caesar was seen as a serpent who was ready to strike and create a society that revolved around himself and would keep him at the top. On the contrary, even though the conspirators claim to have had the best intentions of Rome in their conscious and actions when assassinating Caesar, Rome still plunged itself into a civil war that disrupted the peace in the nation. Therefore, was Caesar a menace to society even though he led Rome to victory over Pompey, brought peace and created a sense of nationalism in Rome, and enforced the laws strictly in the case of Metellus Cimber in Act 3, Scene

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

Julius Caesar was the Dictator of Rome in 42 BC who accomplished many things. Many people believed that he was a hero, but Julius Caesar was a very ambitious dictator and was more of a villain than a hero. Julius Caesar was a villain because he didn’t think first before doing something, he forced the Senate to name him dictator for life and he also was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. To begin with, Julius Caesar was a was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. Caesar used his power as dictator more towards his advantage instead of helping the people in Rome.

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

Sin’s Perpetrator and Victim Human desire knows no bounds; everyone thirsts for something. Some thirst for power, some for wealth, and others for truth. This thirst is a driving factor for most actions, but it is not always for the best. Nowhere else are the dangers of wanting more prevalent than in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. The underlying premise of the play is that one’s own ambition can end up destroying him/her and creating unintended chaos.

Read More

More about How Was Julius Caesar Ruthless

Related Topics

Open Document