Although the judicial system was different in several ways, it outlined how we prosecute and defend people in modern court
DBQ Essay The United States Constitution is a document that or founding fathers made in order to replace the failing Articles of Confederation (A of C). Under the Constitution, the current government and states don’t have the problems they faced when the A of C was in action. The Constitution was created in 1788, and held an idea that the whole nation was nervous about. This idea was a strong national government, and the Federalist assured the people that this new government would work. The framers of the Constitution decided to give more power to the Federal government rather than the state governments because the A of C had many problems, there was a need for the layout of new government, rights, and laws, and there was a need for the Federal
If it wasn’t for the Constitution, congress wouldn’t have eventually gained the money to pay off their debt the Revolutionary War caused. Another long-term effect would’ve been conflict between states. With no national justice system set up, the sovereign states wouldn’t be able to settle disputes themselves. If these states couldn’t settle any disputes, it would’ve caused conflict and eventually, they would have completely turned against each other instead of allowing a
They decided the constitution and the government it created would be the supreme law of the land, and that states would not have the broad powers they originally had with the articles of confederation. The federal government would have broad powers, including; the power to tax, to regulate commerce, and to control the currency. There would also be a system of checks and balances created between the levels of government, which eased fears of one branch becoming too powerful and creating the possibility of tyranny. Each level of government would “compete” with one another and in return often frustrate each other. The Congress and House of Representatives would have different term lengths and limits, the president would have the power to veto congress, and judges would be “separate” from the government as its members would serve for
The founding father’s idea when they created the Constitution was to prevent a centralized government. As expressed by James Madison in Federalist No. 51, they believe that the power surrendered by people would be divided between the federal and state governments, creating balance of power that would enable both governments to control each other. Over time, the balance of power between the federal and state governments has shifted in favor of the federal government and this has taken place with the help of the Constitution and by enactments of Congress. The role that Chief Justice John Marshall played in defining the power of the federal and state governments during the early 19th century is important to mention because he shaped the nation.
There were no executive and non-judicial, two of the three branches of government we have today as a system of checks and balances. But, on the other hand, The Constitution is doing way better than the Article of confederation. The Constitution has a strong central government, States have delegated powers, and the Federal government has sovereignty. They also have 3 branches of government which are the legislative, executive, and judicial while the articles of confederation only have one branch which is the legislative branch.
In addition, there was no judicial system; instead, the Framers left this power to the states. The United States Constitution has a strong executive branch to enforce laws and to lead the nation during war time. In addition, the US constitution leaves the groundwork for a judicial system that was
The one thing that I would change about the judicial branch would be the way county judges and justice of the peace are selected. Since they are selected in partisan election this plays a big factor in their qualifications. This form of electing a judge is the same as a popularity race. The judges that are being nominated by a certain party will contribute more for their campaign and it is easy for special interest groups to spend more money to influence the courts to elect their nominee. If we get away with partisan election and just have the judges run in an election to it would lead to less scandal and favoring one party over the other, as one party might decide one way than the other in a court case
Introduction and Summary: Chapter 11 focuses on the individuals with mental illness and the criminal justice system. Every year there are hundreds of thousands of individuals with mental illness who are arrested. The past decade a lot of the state hospital and mental health facilities have been shut down for lack of funding. Many of the seriously mentally ill are roaming the streets. The serious mental illness regarding this chapter would include schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and severe depression.
The government didn’t want to create a tyranny, so they thought giving the country their own amount of power would help. Instead people broke laws left and right, and when someone went to court for a crime, each system was different. Meaning that each state had it’s own approach, so you could be charged as guilty in one state, and innocent in the next. This is shown in the drawing Rough Sailing Ahead by McDougal Littel. It depicts waves such as “No national court system,” and “No power to create taxes,” as one of the problems faced under the Articles.
America’s criminal justice system need to make a change. We are constantly wasting millions of dollars on prison cells that won’t even be needed if they gave citizens who broke the law quick and easy punishments. In our society today many youths are being sentenced harsh punishments due to petty crimes, these harsh punishments include five or more years in prisons. Our criminal justice system is just plain corrupted and unreasonable. Judges show give fast punishments which are less severe to citizens who has broke small laws.
Most criminals were given only broad maximum terms of (state of being locked in a prison). If federal judges were selected/hired to deliver any sentence, the sentence would go from probation to the law-related highest possible value. No meaningful (taking a court case to a higher court for review) of the sentence was available to the offender. With the judges meeting up to make their final legal decision, each judge 's individual ideas/plans of justice and views of the purposes of sentencing, and sentences for almost the same offenses varied very much depending on the identity of the sentencing judge. Also, the system was not limited to sentencing judges.
The Federal government bears the supreme part of the relationship with the state and local governments having some residual authority. While inmates who are tried through the federal court system and subsequently sentenced and housed in federal prison institutions, the same processes take place at lower levels of government in both state and local levels. Structurally equal, all forms of federal, state, or local judiciary systems follow the same laws. There are only some minor adjustments with what laws applies to which system. Some laws are geared more towards a federal infraction than through state and local laws, and vice
Assignment #1 Review questions Chap. 1 p. 26: 1. A single standard of ethics cannot be applied to all criminal justice agencies. The world is too complex to legislate morality and ethics. The cultures that make up each part of the world are not the same.
There are three components that make up the criminal justice system – the police, courts, and correctional facilities – they all work together in order to protect individuals and their rights as a citizen of society to live without the fear of becoming the victim of a crime. Crime, simply put is when a person violates criminal law; the criminal justice system is society’s way of implementing social control. When all three components of the criminal justice work together, it functions almost perfectly. For a person to enter the criminal justice system, the process must begin with the law enforcement.
