ipl-logo

Illinois Death Penalty Case Study

974 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Life imprisonment vs capital punishment

America is a society where the population keeps on rising, and if it keeps rising the more likely someone is to commit a horrible crime. Due to this increase of population the murder rates keep going up and the amount of first degree murders go up with it. According to the website deathpenaltyinfo.org the murder rates of states with no death penalty have a higher murder rate per thousand than most other states, the highest being Illinois with a murder rate of 8.2. This is a clear indication that the lack of a death penalty in Illinois is why the murder rate keeps rising, people are not afraid enough of just going to jail for their punishment and getting out 30+ years later. There needs to be a harsher punishment to people how are taking away …show more content…

A case study was shown that people who get life in prison without parole can cost just as much through the ways of appealing due to the infinite amounts they can appeal to the court and jury and people on Death Row are less likely to appeal as much as people that have a life sentence in jail without parole do. (Edwin H. Sutherland) There is the counter argument that life without parole is cheaper and yes it is at the very beginning but with time and a good lawyer that is involved in every case where there is this punishment involved the price drastically jumps. It goes from at least $100,000 to an …show more content…

Not only was the murder she commited on Travis Alexander a first-degree murder, it was cruel in the fact that she stabbed him a dozen times, shot him, and after all that happened she ended up taking pictures of the dead body. Not only is the murder a first degree murder just the fact that she kept changing her statement to make the jury feel some sympathy towards her shows really how much she should really receive the death penalty. There is the counterargument of saying it was “accidental” or “self-defense” according to certain people which one shot, 12 knife wounds doesn't seem accidental and planned out because of her taking the pictures

Show More
Related
737 Words | 3 Pages

In California, the death penalty costs an estimated $499.7 million per year, while life without parole is $11.5 million per year (Report of the California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice). This extreme cost of the death penalty comes from paying for systems that filter the crimes eligible for capital punishment, systems that run the death penalty, and systems that give the defendants a fair trial (Report of the California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice). In Los Angeles, each execution costs an estimated $250 million; however, life imprisonment in Los Angeles has a significantly smaller price tag (Rone). Statistically speaking, if the death penalty were removed, it would save a substantial amount of money for California. This outrageous price tag is exactly why capital punishment should be removed from the legal

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

If the death penalty came more into effect now a days, there would be a lot less killing, homicides, murders, etc. Go back to the old days; eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth. If you steal, one finger gets cut off. If the government would stop being terrified of hurting someone’s feelings in this society and bring back those actions, crime percentages would fall

Read More
333 Words | 2 Pages

RUNNING HEAD: Executions pg. 1 Inmate Executions COR 120_191 Mia Lombardi Tiffin University RUNNING HEAD: Executions pg. 2 The question of the constitutionality of the sentencing of an inmate on Death Row in Texas is currently being reviewed by the Supreme Court and found in favor of defendant Duane Buck.

Read More
1776 Words | 8 Pages

What is the difference in price between keeping people in jail without parole and executing the death penalty? The cost of executing someone who is on death row depends mostly on what state they are in and what method is being used. The cost of it is said to be higher than keeping someone in jail without parole, but this is mostly because the person who is going to be put on death row goes through a very complex judicial process. This includes many trials and every aspect of the case is examined to make sure that the evidence is correct. Things like DNA testing are used to make sure the evidence is accurate and is something that is very costly.

Read More
2229 Words | 9 Pages

The death penalty sends a message to citizens; a message that says murder is not outrageous, unless the state is doing it as a sanction. This message helps to justify civilian killings of people believed to be deserving of death and may possibly even cause an uprise in vigilante style murders. This message also leaves an almost open air on what is wrong and provides no consistent moral ground for society to base their beliefs on. This does not mean that people will suddenly think murder is a favorable deed, but it may cause some to not realize how terrible it is. Joseph Summer wrote this in an article titled “Some Adverse Effects of the Death Penalty in History”: “…people learned 3 lessons from the government’s violent example: to use

Read More
464 Words | 2 Pages

Method of execution Lethal injection for all 12 Crimes that Warranted Death PenaltyFirst degree murder (usually in addition to rape or robbery) treason (never actually used) How the Death Penalty was Decided The jury would decide whether the defendant was guilty or not, and then in another phase of the trial, would decide to use the death penalty or not. Victim Impact StatementsWhen

Read More
815 Words | 4 Pages

Death Qualification: Choosing Jury in Death Penalty Cases Death qualification is a process unique to capital trials in which prospective jurors are questioned about their beliefs regarding the death penalty. Courts can eliminate potential jurors who are not willing to vote for the death penalty in a capital case. If the judge believes that a juror 's feelings about the death penalty would impair his or her ability to judge the case and choose the punishment fairly, that juror will be dismissed "for cause. " There is an unlimited number of "for cause" challenges and typically all jurors who say that they oppose the death penalty are excluded. Jurors who are not eliminated by the judge "for cause" because of their death penalty views can be eliminated

Read More
877 Words | 4 Pages

People argue that the death penalty is a good way to protect our population from these criminals that have done terrible things. While that may be true, life without parole still protects the population from these criminals as they will be in prison for the rest of their lives. Also, the price of a death penalty case is significantly higher than that of a life without parole case. A life without parole case typically averages at about $740,000 while a death penalty case averages at about $1.26 million. The death penalty also puts innocent lives at risk.

Read More
1134 Words | 5 Pages

Eliot Spitzer once said, “Our criminal justice system is fallible. We know it, even though we don't like to admit it. It is fallible despite the best efforts of most within it to do justice. And this fallibility is, at the end of the day, the most compelling, persuasive, and winning argument against a death penalty.” Many people in America are in favor of capital punishment because some crimes violate the moral codes of our society.

Read More
963 Words | 4 Pages

persecuted falsely, only that they lack the proper capacity to defend themselves. Some of the juries do not apply their professional sense but are guided by complicit biases that make them accuse some suspects just from their looks. The topic is worth studying to help in fighting the practice in the United States and other parts of the world. Research methodology This study employs qualitative approach and relies greatly on the available scholarly materials to ventilate the subject matter (Hood & Hoyle, 2015).

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

It seems as though the state of California has been on a continuum with the death penalty. Historically, executions were carried out by firing squads, hangings, gas chambers and lethal injection. In 1972, the Supreme Court of California ruled in People v. Anderson that the current death penalty laws were unconstitutional and called for a suspension of capital punishment. Then was reinstated in 1978 with executions carried out in the gas chambers at San Quentin State Prison. With the introduction of the standard lethal injection in 1993, it has been modified to support the new chamber specifically for lethal injection.

Read More
950 Words | 4 Pages

The Attorney General alone donates 15% of his budget, to death penalty cases. Maintaining each death row prisoner costs taxpayers $90,000 per year. It cost more than $31,000 to keep someone in prison for a year. The most recent report is that only fifteen states have gotten rid of it all together. These states being Alaska, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia and Wisconsin.

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

“‘Death sentences represent less than one-tenth of 1% of prison sentences in the United States…,’” (Von Drehle, 9). Furthermore, death row is just a small fraction of the criminal justice system and can not be based on that alone. For instance, what many don't take into account is the justice systems allows for many states, such as the populous state of New York, to ban the death penalty. (state laws, p1)

Read More
468 Words | 2 Pages

When it comes to the topic of the death penalty being cost effective, some of us will readily agree that the death penalty is cheaper than sentencing a convicted murders to life in prison without parole. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of does the death penalty really cost less than life in prison without parole. Whereas some are convinced that it is cheaper to give the prisoner life in prison without parole, others maintain that it is cheaper to give the prisoner the death penalty. My own view is that it’s cheaper to sentence them to life without parole because they don’t have to pay lawyers, cost for executing the prisoner, and cost of the case.

Read More
1320 Words | 6 Pages

The major reason why the death penalty should be abolished is that the cost of the death penalty is too much and the USA is in debt to many other countries. What this means is that the death penalty should be abolished and also the cost death penalty is more than the cost of maximum sentence life in prison. According to J. Marceau and H. Whitson, “The Cost of Colorado’s Death penalty,” 3 Univ. of Denver Criminal Law Review “A new study of the cost of the death penalty in Colorado revealed that capital proceedings require six times more days in court and

Read More

More about Illinois Death Penalty Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document