Immanuel Kant's Philosophy, Critique of Pure Reason, demonstrates the connection between the human mind and its various faculties that contribute to the production of experience. Kant's reasoning to the production of experience truly outweighs the reasoning of production explained by David Hume in Treatise. Kant is far more detailed to the point where you would truly get a grasp of what he is say
To begin with, in Immanuel Kant’s Transcendental Doctrine of Elements he discusses two concepts, space and time in relation to the mind. For example, he claims, “The effect of an object upon the faculty a representation, so far as we are affected by it, is sensation”(A 20). He is expressing that in order to experience things within the world we
…show more content…
He goes on to describe the bundle Theory In correlation to us. For example, he states, “Each of us is nothing but a bundle or collection of different perceptions that follow each other enormously quickly and are in a perpetual flux and movement” (Hume 131). In this context, he is describing how we are based on a series of experiences and perceptions that we have or things that happened to make us up. To put this into perspective, If you have someone named John who is a math teacher, loves soccer, has a wife and kids, wears glasses, and so on these are the things that make up who he is which is part of his identity. So everything that makes up John I'm able to categorize only specifically to John because that is his identity, the same would be be applied to someone else with different qualities to make up their identity. It is also important to note that Hume's Bundle Theory mentions that we are not the same bundle or collection of perceptions that we once were compared to today. For instance, he states, “We do not observe to be on unchanging and uninterrupted, what we are really talking about is not a single object, but rather a sequence of related objects” (Humes 133). This represents the part of Hume's Bundle Theory where he explains that the self is constantly changing as the same collections of Impressions, experiences, and perceptions are changing so they no longer shape the same identity of who we were then compared to