Using Kant’s notion of a maxim it would be wrong to cheat on the final exam in a course that you do not like and feel you will not benefit from. In the book it stated this, “Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) argued that lying is wrong under any circumstances. He did not appeal to religion; instead, he held that lying is forbidden by reason itself” (Rachels 129). This shows that no matter what the situation may be that lying is looked down upon. He believed that every rational person should believe the Categorical Imperative. This tells people if their act is morally allowed. Rules become “maxim” of how people act. In the book it stated this about rules becoming a “maxim,” “In other words, would you allow your rule to be followed by all people at all time? If so, then your maxim is sounds and your acts is acceptable” (Rachels. 130). This shows what is acceptable and what is wrong. Since cheating on the final exam would not be considered “okay” or even “right” by everyone, this is an act that would be considered forbidden. Kant’s approach to this kind of example would be different than the approach of the ethical egoist and utilitarian. In the book it stated this, “According to Utilitarianism, our duty is to do whatever will increase the amount of …show more content…
In the book it state this, “Ethical Egoism, again, is the doctrine that each person ought to pursue his or her own self-interest exclusively” (Rachels 71). Since she does not believe she would benefit from taking the class, a person who believes in egoism would cheat on the final because that is what she personally wants to do. The book also stated, “The theory only insists that the benefit to others is not what makes the act right. Rather, the act is right because it benefits you” (Rachels,71). Since she would not benefit in taking the class, she would benefit more if she cheated, because she is not gaining any knowledge in taking the
Module Three Rough Draft One of the most common problems in our schooling system is that students cheat. This happens a lot with older students who struggle with the topic that their assignment is on. In “The Shadow Scholar” by Ed Dante, and “Introduction: Fraud and Fundamental Misunderstandings” by Shane Borrowman shows how students cheat to move on in their education. In both of these texts the authors tell their first-hand stories of their different students cheating.
One of my classmates used to cheat on some of the exams or quizzes we took on class, so she never studied but passed the class. She ignored the fact that, it was not going to be good for her in the future, and so one day we had a pop quiz. As a consequence of that behavior of never studying, she failed the pop quiz. In other words, she was ignoring the fact that studying would become beneficial at what point of the course and that she was actually lying to herself, not to the teacher. She lied to herself as she thought to learn was not beneficial, but just a waste of her personal time.
The principle claims that an act is morally acceptable if, and only if, its maxim is universalizability (163). A maxim states one's actions and the motivation behind the action (163). "Universalizability is determined following a three-part test. First the maxim needs to be formulated clearly. Next it needs to fit in a world in where everyone supports and acts on the maxim.
Yee brings up the fact that for these students, “anything less than a grade of 85 is “failing”; achieve anything more than a grade-point average of 95, and you might be bound for the Massachusetts Institute of Technology or Yale” (Yee 5). The fundamental issue with this is very reminiscence of the issue with the last point that was discussed. The issue here is that if cheating is a necessary means to get into a good college, then the student who cheated is not ready for the curriculum of that college. Hard work should be the deciding factor of who makes it into Ivy League colleges.
This proves that whenever given the opportunity to do well, we should always think about the consequences on what could happen if we go too far. We need to look at it from every angle and ask ourselves “Is it really ok to cheat or am I overzealous? How is this going to end? Am I really doing what is right?” It’s important to aspire and be determined, but we need to make sure we are not blinded by our ambition, because even if we think we are seeing clearly now, hindsight is 20-20.
Ever since the beginning of civilization, we the people have created standards and rules that regulate our actions throughout our daily lives. These rules are completely unique to us and the harshness or strictness of each rule varies among the type of person. For example, a person that is conscious of their environment and takes caution throughout their life will have rules regulating the types of activities that they participate in because of their personality. However, a person that is very relaxed and laid back will have less rules about what not to do. Rules have a very important impact on a person’s life.
9/12/2016 Abdulaziz ENG -100 Assignment No.1 Kate Brennan In “Slip-Sliding Away, Down the Ethical Slope,” by Robert J. Sternberg, the author is concerned about a real problem that begins to spread within the whole society, which, in his words “goes much deeper than the occasional incident”. In fact, it is okay for cheaters to cheat, but they do not want to be caught. He starts off by giving two examples for two types of cheating. First, copying the work of someone else and getting exam answers beforehand.
The end does not justify the means. This was the principal ethical theory of Immanuel Kant and made up his ‘Categorical Imperative’, a deontological argument which showcased how certain actions are fundamentally wrong, such as murder, lying or torture and can therefore, never be justified. Contrastingly a utilitarian would claim that the ends do in fact justify the means and would enact a focus on outcomes in deciding whether or not an action is morally permissible. In 2002 Jakob Von Metzler, a boy of just twelve years, was kidnapped and a police officer threatened the kidnapper, Magnus Gafgen, with torture in an attempt to find and save the child. Gafgen told the officer that he had killed the boy and then disclosed the location of the body.
As a Kantian, the ultimate goal is to focus on our maxims and not on how much pain or pleasure the act could possibly produce. So as a result, Kant would argue that Jim should not kill the Indian man, even if it would save the other Indian men. The reason why is because Kant does not believe in using people as mere means, it wouldn’t be considered a conceivable maxim, and it would be betraying a perfect duty. The definition of deontology is having the belief that you do what’s right because you have a moral duty.
That aside not every student will take a pledge and feel obligated to stop cheating or to be completely honesty. This could be the flaw in the honor code, stating that the students take a pledge to not use plagiarism or cheat which means that not every student will have the integrity to not cheat when he/ she didn’t study for a test and has the integrity to be honest to the educator that they have
As you can tell people cheat on the work just to keep going and not doing the work themselves. We need to set a good example for students. Without help from one another, cheating makes sense for many students because there is noone there for
“Succeed so that you can help us in future”. This is always the narrative when a member of the society gets into higher learning. The general population wants to get the best out of someone but what happens when circumstances do not allow for success. Cheating in the exam is one way to make people happy in that one has to violate the rules that govern exam misconduct. In this case, cheating is good but is it morally correct?
I found this week lectures are very interesting about philosopher Immanuel Kant. He teaches us about what is good will which “is good in itself, not because of what is accomplishes”, a good thing is always a good thing, not because of something that makes it good (Week 4 Lesson). He believes that lying is wrong and we should never lie even if the result is not good. He also talks about Categorical Imperative which has two formulations: Theoretical and Practical Formulation. Applying these two formulation into the dilemma we have this week about the Crazed Murderer, I supposed to tell the murderer that my friend went home to hide when he comes to my door looking for my friend.
Study shows that one reason why students cheat is because they feel as if they almost have to because of their peers. In their article, “Source Is Important When Developing A Social Norms Campaign to Combat Academic Dishonesty”, Jennifer N. Engler and Joshua D. Landau maintains that “By this account, students cheat because they believe that their peers
We are taught the difference between the right and wrong since our childhood but are always told that the lying and cheating always makes things difficult but when students go to school and college they are faced with different dilemma as then the cheating seems to be the easier way to get good grades. They do not really see cheating as the wrong way of doing things they see it as an easy way of doing things .They do not even consider it as an unethical thing because they have been taught that to do the right thing is the easy way .They are taught that the right path and the ethical path is always the easy one but in reality that is not true. The ethical and right path is difficult and complex as J.K.Rowling has said, “Sometimes we must choose between what is right and what is easy.”