Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of prison on society
Possitive affects of prison
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In her book “The New Jim Crow” (2010), Michelle Alexander, a civil rights lawyer and an activist in the civil rights movements, that many people think has long been concluded, argues that the results of prison go well beyond the walls of the facility and can even have a perpetual effect on a person's life. Alexanders exact words on page 142 are “ Once labeled a felon, the badge of inferiority remains with you for the rest of your life, relegating you to a permanent second-class status.” Alexander supports her claim by interviewing people and describing their experiences in prison and their life after prison. She also informs the reader of laws that make it harder for felons to not only get jobs, but also limits their access to housing, and
In Michelle Alexander’s talk, she described how discrimination becomes legalized once individuals become branded as a felon. As a result of a felony conviction, tons of offenders lose their right to vote, right to serve on jury, right to be free on legal discrimination regarding housing, and access to education. These restrictions connect to the systems of privilege, as it reinforces the stigma against felons while the social power of law enforcement agencies rises. The systems of privilege get maintained with the use of social control. According to statistics that Alexander gathered, African American males were the ones mostly affected by the felon disenfranchisement laws.
Removing these obstacles that stop people from discriminating against other individuals who are trying to obtain housing, employment, financial aid and other things people need to live can lead to reduced recidivism rates and overall improvements in public safety and well-being. By considering the potential consequences of perpetuating societal exclusion through the retention of criminal records, this article encourages a critical examination of the role of criminal justice policies in perpetuating cycles of poverty and recidivism. Ashford's article prompts a multifaceted evaluation of the relationship between criminal records policies and the criminal justice system. By exploring the potential benefits and drawbacks of automatically expunging certain records after seven years, this article contributes to a deeper understanding of how criminal justice policies can impact individuals' lives and broader societal outcomes. Bloom, Tina, and G. A. Bradshaw.
In Michelle Alexander’s book, she talks about the difficulties and barriers that ex-offenders face once they were released from jail regarding housing. She explains, “During Jim Crow, it was legal to deny housing on the basis of race, through restrictive covenants and other exclusionary practices” (Alexander 144). During this time, the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, was passed by Congress to create strict lease agreements and evictions of public housing tenants who engaged in any criminal activity. If they broke the law, then they no longer had the opportunity to have a home. The problem with this is that this impacted not only the ex-felons but their families as well.
After leaving prison, a felon is already viewed as not as important as a citizen who has never committed a crime. It can be very difficult to participate and take part in community activities such as getting a job. Felons feel unimportant and unwanted. It is unjust for felons to be treated this way. Several people who have been incarcerated have been interviewed on this topic.
Abstract: This paper provides an introduction to the social impact of the collateral consequences (the families left behind) of mass incarceration. The reading will include thoughts from sociological perspectives and empirical studies that focus on the consequences incarceration and re-entry have on the striving family left behind. Partners and families of felons suffer from the system in place that punishes, rather than “corrects,” criminal behavior. Collateral Consequences Patience Kabwasa Prof. Laura Howe Soc 231-C21 May 1, 2014 Collateral Consequences
Not even countries known for locking up its citizens, like China, Iran, or Russia come close to the United States’ 700 people living behind bars for every 100,000 people (Kelley & Sterbenz, 2014). Unfortunately, the problem with mass incarceration is not limited to living behind bars. Alexander expertly guides the reader down the rabbit hole of the additional ramifications of being labeled a felon in American society: the complexity of laws that prohibits felons from public assistance, like housing or food stamps, legislation that take away felons’ voting rights, regulations that make it legal for employers to discriminate against felons, and statutes that control felons’ movements and their affiliations. The New Jim Crow further highlights a series of court precedents that make it impractical for defendants to claim the police, the prosecutors, or the justice system is undeniably racist as a defense. Arguably, being a person of color, who is labeled a felon, makes it legal for the rest of society to prevent you from participating in a free society
When a person is described as a felon it “presents a significant barrier to reintegration” (Labels). Labels create harmful stereotypes that place expectations on people that are hard to break. Once labeled, felons are forever regarded as such. This places so much power into one word. This power then denies “people with criminal records jobs, housing, education” and other resources in life (Labels).
Michelle Alexander, a civil rights lawyer and legal scholar, argues not only that mass incarceration is a “well-disguised system of racialized social control that functions in a manner strikingly similar to Jim Crow"(4), but that the prison label placed on convicts is “more damaging to the African American community than the shame and stigma associated with Jim Crow’ (17). While I had previous knowledge of the systematic racial oppression that continues to hold power in our country, I did not have any idea of to what extent the label of ‘felon’ has on the life
Stock hill Lane aims to supports ex-offenders in the transition of leaving prison and to address issues of reoffending, consequently persistent re-offenders, have multiple and complex needs. There is a very high correlation between persistent offenders and history of social exclusion and disadvantage. The density and diversity of the difficulties faced by ex- offenders are numerous many have poor skills and very little experience of employment, negative social networks, severe housing problems, and all of this is often complicated by drug, alcohol and mental health issues. Research from Social Exclusion Unit (SEU) suggests that the elements which impacts on offending behaviour are diverse and highlights that the factors which help to tackle
Despite being exonerated, many victims of the prison systems face prejudice and anger from their peers and even from their family members. Even if there is no anger, there still may be a sense of shame which can affect an exoneree. To make matters worse, there are very few programs to help exonerees, unlike with felons who receive a wide variety of assistance from housing to cash aid. Exonerees have to face the harsh critics of the outside world while having to struggle to survive as “they don’t qualify for the programs designed to serve ex-felons” (Pishko). They have to fight tooth and nail to acquire stable work to support themselves and their families.
Slavery, Jim Crow, the ghetto, and the carceral apparatus are all structural institutions that share a mutual beneficial relationship where each has supplemented and historically progressed into more advanced subtle forms of oppression and racism. Past and current regimes served as social functions with the objective of encompassing African Americans in a permanent subordinate position. In each generation, newer developments of a racial caste emerge with the same objective of repudiating African Americans citizenship. The only thing that has changed since Jim Crow is the language we use to justify racial exclusion (Alexander, 2). These four regimes are genealogically linked because they all advanced and developed from one another.
violent or nonviolent (1). It is hard to figure out who is a violent criminal due to the way they were charged under the justice system. There is no way of showing whether or not violence was used while they were dealing or drug using. These statistics prove that by focusing on other resolutions for non-violent crimes, the incarceration rates could be reduced. Along with rehabilitation for drug offenders, there is also a need for proper rehabilitation of mentally ill patients and prisoners to keep them from relapsing and ending up back in the system.
I know most inmates get jobs within the jail that pay very little like 20 cents an hour so imagine an inmate barely having enough to purchase some soap or food, then they have to face the challenge of having to pay for their stay? On the other side I also understand the Civil rights side which is the side I 'm going with, although their argument is very weak. It doesn 't necessarily create a barrier to rehabilitation, if anything it just puts a huge strain financially and it could possibly make people never want go back to jail. Lastly whether or not they paid taxes in the past, shouldn 't matter, what matters is if they pay taxes after their incarceration maybe that way the government can get some money back from an inmates ' previous
What I plan on researching is, what is the purpose of the Criminal Justice System when it comes to punishment and rehabilitation. Proposed Thesis Statement: The thesis statement for my paper is: Is punishment the main goal of the criminal justice system when it comes to the offenders or is it rehabilitation the intended goal for offenders. The title for my paper would be The Purpose of the Criminal Justice Punishment or Rehabilitation?