'Inception Vs The Secret Life Of Walter Mitty'

1449 Words6 Pages

Inception vs. Descartes. Inception suggests that you can know that you’re dreaming and therefore act and behave accordingly in a dream to achieve a desired outcome. Descartes, states that while in a dream, it is impossible to know that you are dreaming. “His dream argument asserts that we cannot have knowledge because, for all we know, we may be dreaming right now” (Schick, p. 594). In both the movie Inception and Descartes, each postulate that dreams can be so real that can be impossible to know if you are dreaming or not. The movie solves this assertion by introducing the concept that you could have an object that only the possessor knows its properties which can ensure you are awake and not dreaming. On the other hand, Descartes proposes no such simple fix, but states that if …show more content…

Drawing from other films of Hollywood, i.e. Beautiful Minds, the protagonist realizes his schizophrenia pals are not real because they never age; in “The Secret Life of Walter Mitty”, the protagonist becomes super action hero, and it reality you don’t have to be asleep to be influenced by someone else, advertisers do it all the time. “For whether I am awake or asleep, two and three together always form five, and the square can never have more than four sides, and it does not seem possible that truths so clear and apparent can be suspected of any falsity [or uncertainty]” (Schick, p. 625). I propose that Cobb is Donald Crabtree, biology teacher at the local high school in Monrovia, California. This is his ultimate escape from a nagging wife, boring suburban living, a dull job, with two screaming kids that he has to deal with each and every night upon his arrival at