ipl-logo

Indiana Death Letter

596 Words3 Pages

Lonnie M. Randolph Senator Indiana Senate 200 West Washington Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Dear Senator Randolph: I am writing about Indiana’s involvement with the death penalty. The death penalty in Indiana has been around since the early 1800’s. The thought of putting another human being to death is hard to envision. I believe that there are some things that can be done in replace of this. According to the Indiana Public Defender Council, website, nearly ⅔ of the world’s nation has abolished the death penalty. In 1972 the US Supreme Court, in the case of Furman Vs. Georgia stopped all state death penalty sentences. They believed that the death penalty went against the Eighth Amendment’s cruel and unusual clause because they allowed a capricious infliction of death and could lead to prejudice and biased factors that could affect the sentencing. At the time the case took place seven men, who were sentenced to the death penalty, sentences were overturned and abridged to life in prison. As of right now there are thirteen men and one woman awaiting death row in Indiana. With the right amount of support, I have no doubt that the same can happen. …show more content…

An argument that has been made many times before, but has a solid point, is that the government is sending the wrong message. With the death penalty in place, it sends the message that it is okay to kill people who have killed other people. With that being said it opens the doors for other citizens to take it into their own hands. If it is alright for the government to kill murderers, they can use this reasoning to justify killing that person because they want

Show More
Related
229 Words | 1 Pages

Some criminals deserve to die because they should not have the privilege to live 30 years after, from being sentenced to death for committing first degree murder. For example, there has been a case, in 1984, where Kermit Alexander’s family was murdered. As a matter of fact, the criminals have not been executed since they have received the death sentence.

Read More
676 Words | 3 Pages

Countless people have committed murders, all around the world. Some are attempts, and some lead to actual deaths. Most gain time in jail, but some receive the death penalty. Why? By reason of innocents dead by the hands of another.

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

Being on death row often prolongs the pain for the inmate. They spend their time in prison fearing the inevitable which for them is death. Today, we live in a society that is very divided on this issue. There are many in support of the death penalty, suggesting that it acts as a positive deterrent against future crime. There are also many

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

These arguments can be supported and solidified by the cases of Andre Thomas and Anthony Graves. Those who wish to abolish the death penalty may begin by arguing that

Read More
265 Words | 2 Pages

The death penalty shouldn’t be abolished nationwide. There are several different reasons why we should keep the death penalty. Some of reasons death penalty is still legal in most of the states is because it is viewed as revenge for pain and suffering that the criminal inflicted on the victim. In the same way, some people strongly believe that a person who has taken the life of another person does not have a right to live. The death penalty has proven to decrease the number of murder rates in the United States And some believe that convicts should not be allowed to live their life behind bars, it is better to kill them.

Read More
1021 Words | 5 Pages

Support for life without parole sentences has increased, and the number of death sentences in the U.S. has plummeted by 50 percent in recent years. International concerns about the death penalty would probably never be enough alone to make the U.S. abandon this practice. However, because international concerns are generally being given more recognition in the U.S., and because the opinion of those other countries is more unified than ever before, it is likely that the death penalty will come under

Read More
81 Words | 1 Pages

Some see the death penalty as the only means to extract justice for victims. Others see it as a morally reprehensible act where a second wrong is committed in order to make something right. With recent issues surrounding the death penalty in which execution hasn 't gone as planned sparking a nationwide debate, this is my outlook on why I 'm for the death penalty not only being abolished in the state of Texas but in addition to the entirety of the US..

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

The Death Penalty Information Center has discovered that the states with the death penalty still have higher murder rates that those without, some years even up to a forty percent difference. Additionally, the south accounts for eighty percent of all executions, yet it still has the highest crime rates. Therefore, it is statistically proven that the death penalty is not doing what it was created to do, lower crime rates. There is also the belief that the death penalty is the “easy way out” for the criminals because then they don’t have to face the hardships of prison. The criminal also wouldn’t have to live with what they had done and think about their life choices.

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

Ever since the outset of the American Constitution, capital punishment has existed as a crime sentence in the United States. However, in recent decades, this topic has become highly controversial, as many states have dictated against the death penalty. Although states with this position on capital punishment are increasing, some states, such as Texas, have continued to edict this practice in their provinces. In the State of Texas, the sentence to death upon a person should not be permitted due to the fact it can wrongly convict a person, its court trial is highly expensive, and it brings forth an unjust treatment.

Read More
1016 Words | 5 Pages

This is because the death penalty is an explicit violation of the 8th amendment in the United States Bill of Rights. The 8th amendment has three clauses: excessive bail, excessive fines, and cruel and unusual punishment. Capital punishment clearly crosses the line of the last part in the amendment that states “nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” This section does not allow the government to harm any citizen of the United States in such a way, which, as the Supreme Court ruled in 1972, includes the death penalty. In 1972, the Supreme Court was faced with the landmark case Furman v. Georgia.

Read More
851 Words | 4 Pages

In some cases that the death penalty should have been used was the Jeffrey Dahmer case. Jeffrey Dahmer was a killer from Wisconsin who used forms of murder, cannibalism, and necrophilia on his 17 victims(Jeffrey Dahmer). Not charged with death penalty, but he was killed by one of his inmates (Time on Death Row). Dahmer was just an example of many people that should have been put on death row but never actually was. The Death Penalty should not be abolished because Americans should know that if they do a crime horrendous enough they forfeit their life.

Read More
486 Words | 2 Pages

The death penalty, or capital punishment, is given to criminals who commit crimes, such as murder, treason, sabotage, and in some cases sexual abuse/assault of a minor. The topic of killing someone for his or her wrong doings has been a debate in the United States for a while. People against it say it is inhumane, and that life is precious, that the criminal can repent and change. While the other party suggests that criminals who commit certain crimes should be given the highest punishment so that it will protect our country more. The death penalty should be a nationwide act with sooner affect rather than later, to make our country a safer place.

Read More
2153 Words | 9 Pages

The death penalty has been one of the things that has divided this country for decades. Everyone has their own side and a reason why they chose it. Capital punishment should be abolished in every state of the United States because there are dozens of flaws with the system, the cost is millions more than life in prison, the time on death row is so long that the majority

Read More
1649 Words | 7 Pages

It is very important that we abolish the death penalty because we won’t be ending somebody else 's life or killing the innocent. Richard Gossip is an Oklahoma prisoner who got charged with masterminding a 1977 murder at a run down budget motel he managed. Glossip still says that he is innocent. He lost a Supreme Court case in June 2015 and faced execution on Wednesday, September 16th, 2016 at the state penitentiary in McAlester. “If they execute me then I want it to be for a reason.

Read More
1320 Words | 6 Pages

The major reason why the death penalty should be abolished is that the cost of the death penalty is too much and the USA is in debt to many other countries. What this means is that the death penalty should be abolished and also the cost death penalty is more than the cost of maximum sentence life in prison. According to J. Marceau and H. Whitson, “The Cost of Colorado’s Death penalty,” 3 Univ. of Denver Criminal Law Review “A new study of the cost of the death penalty in Colorado revealed that capital proceedings require six times more days in court and

Read More

More about Indiana Death Letter

Related Topics

Open Document