Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

851 Words4 Pages

“If you kill a killer, they will not kill again.” If the death penalty was legalized in all states there would be significantly fewer murderers. As of now there are only 31 states that still use the death penalty (31 States). It was also shown that the death penalty does indeed deter crimes. Basically if the person who is thinking of committing a horrendous crime has a knowledge that they could lose their life, Chances are they’ll change their mind and not actually follow through with said crime. In some cases that the death penalty should have been used was the Jeffrey Dahmer case. Jeffrey Dahmer was a killer from Wisconsin who used forms of murder, cannibalism, and necrophilia on his 17 victims(Jeffrey Dahmer). Not charged with death penalty, but he was killed by one of his inmates (Time on Death Row). Dahmer was just an example of many people that should have been put on death row but never actually was. The Death Penalty should not be abolished because Americans should know that if they do a crime horrendous enough they forfeit their life. Crime rates in all states have been growing and growing …show more content…

One example is the Supreme Court case, Furman v. Georgia. Furman was burglarizing a home and was caught by a resident of the home. While attempting to leave the house Furman fell and the loaded gun he was holding shot one of the residents and they died. Later Furman was convicted of murder and sentenced to death; although, Furman did not intend to kill the person living there. This case was later brought to the Supreme Court, Furman believed the consequences for his crime were cruel and unusual punishment. The Supreme Court ruled in favor to Furman, but later on overturned the case by another case, which was Greg vs. Georgia(Furman v. Georgia ). A lot of people view Capital punishment as a cruel and unusual punishment, and that it went against the eighth