ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

726 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Positives of capital punishment

The moral of the death penalty is that when someone commits a heinous crime, they should be prosecuted in a way that is equal to their crime. Robert Blecker, JD said that "We have the responsibility to punish those who deserve it, but only to the degree they deserve it...." This states that people should get what they deserve. If they go out and commit homicide or murder for fun they should get the same treatment. Losing someone can be tragic, but losing someone because a criminal killed them is even worse. The death penalty provides closure for the victim(s) family and people want to protect their family at any cost.
The physicians and other doctors there are not there to kill them but to make sure they are comforted at their last minute of life instead of in pain. These doctors make sure the criminal is not in pain while he or she dies. Jail is actually a nice place, people who are homeless often commit crimes to go to jail. There they get fed good, they're clothed, they have a roof over their heads, and most of all they benefit from our tax money. Being in jail is better than a death sentence in many ways; they get good meals, they have clothes or someone could escape. They have everything that any normal person would have besides independence and sometimes connections to the outside world.
The inmates …show more content…

There are roughly 2.3 million people convicted for crimes, in that 2.3 million there are 704,000 people who are convicted for a "violent crime". 174,000 are convicted for murder, 17,000 for manslaughter, 165,000 for rape or sexual assault, 170,000 for robbery, 136,000 for assault and 43,000 for other violent crimes. Giving someone the death sentence can cause a domino effect on people's views of committing certain crimes. It acts as a deterrent in some

Show More
Related
1512 Words | 7 Pages

Being on death row often prolongs the pain for the inmate. They spend their time in prison fearing the inevitable which for them is death. Today, we live in a society that is very divided on this issue. There are many in support of the death penalty, suggesting that it acts as a positive deterrent against future crime. There are also many

Read More
434 Words | 2 Pages

The death penalty should not be used to punish violent criminals for, the death penalty is a violation of constitutional rights. Not to mention, the same government that opposes and goes against murder, embraces it by committing the same act. Ultimately, the cost of executing a violent criminal does not provide a solution to crimes that will continuously arise. Reason 1: The death penalty should be

Read More
1454 Words | 6 Pages

The death penalty has proven to be an effective form of protecting citizens. Let’s say someone rapes seven different people, if they are dead, they will never hurt anyone again. The death penalty is moral in the sense of protecting society because it ensures that these horrible people will not harm anyone again. The main argument that continues to be brought up is the worth of human life. There is a belief that regardless of morality, all humans deserve to live.

Read More
1329 Words | 6 Pages

First established in 18th century BC, the death penalty has been common place in nearly every society throughout history. Today, however, the death penalty has no effect on homicide rates. In todays society, the death penalty has no affect on homicide rates. An article published by John J. Donohue III, PhD, revealed that “last year roughly 14,000 murders were committed but only 35 executions took place.” Typically, a murderer faces far greater risks immediately after committing the crime rather than years later.

Read More
389 Words | 2 Pages

Is the Death Penalty Doing More Harm Than Good? Is the death penalty waisting rehabilitated criminals by executing them? In January of 2016, there were 2,943 death row inmates, that's more about 1,440 more people that died on the prison system, endure long, cruel wait times, and each and every one of them cost taxpayers thousands of dollars. In 2011 the average gap between sentencing, and execution was 16.5 years, some convicts won't make it to the execution chamber, because they die of natural causes first.

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

When I think about the death penalty, the first thing that comes to my mind is the victim and the family members of the victims. It is through the death penalty that the victim and family members receive retribution. Without the death penalty, prisons become overpopulated causing a stressful environment that creates conflict between prisoners. As these conflicts arise, the state will need to spend money to hire more guards and security to assist in these conflicts, which can be very costly. It is obvious that the death serves as a specific deterrence so that these criminals will not continue to commit these crimes.

Read More
934 Words | 4 Pages

The death penalty violently and brutally ends the life of evil criminals. The death penalty can be viewed as the punishment legally fitting the crime. The death penalty gives justice to the victims and their families. The death penalty gives the victims peace of mind. The death penalty can be viewed as a necessary evil to achieve justice.

Read More
399 Words | 2 Pages

There are some states where the death penalty or also known as capital punishment doesn’t exist, in that case is where, life without parole is their sentence. This is putting them on prison, keeping them from society, it’s almost just as bad as death penalty. There are many opinions about the death penalty, opinions like it being inhumane, or cruel and painful. Whatever the circumstance, there is a high percentage of inmates that get sentenced or put on death row, and they don’t even see the chamber. Mostly because the death rate is low in a lot of states.

Read More
229 Words | 1 Pages

Therefore, there are many different things people can do instead of sentencing criminals to death. People can sentence murders to life without parole and, yes sometimes they still manage to be released somehow way before they should be allowed too, but for that not to happen we should make our sentencing stricter. Instead of spending the extra money on keeping the death penalty running, they could use that money to shape up the whole prison system, putting the worst criminals in certain prisons that are made only for those types of criminals around America. This would make our society more humane, because they are not doing any more legal murder. Because in all honesty the killers are not truly being punished with the whole being sentenced

Read More
639 Words | 3 Pages

Life without parole costs way less, and is overall more convenient, as the court cases would take less. Statistics say that the number of black executions grows by the year, so does the ratio of black executions to black population; according to

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

The death penalty happen in all different type of states. In every state that retains the death penalty, jurors have the option of sentencing convicted capital murderers to life in prison without the possibility of parole. The sentence is cheaper to tax-payers and keeps violent offenders off the streets for good. Death penalties mostly consist of various forms of murder such as murder commited during a drug related drive by shooting, murder during kidnapping, murder for hire, and genocide. During the death penalty those who kill white peoples are more likely to be sentenced to die than those that kill African-Americans.

Read More
356 Words | 2 Pages

People might go against or favor death penalty based on race, gender, politics, religion, or age. Politically, most Republicans(72%) favor its use in cases of murder, while most Democrats(34%) oppose it(Pew Research Center, 2016). Based on gender, men are more likely to back the use of the death penalty with a 55% than women with a 43%. Men are more likely to support the death penalty, however, they have a greater chance to be executed. Based on race, white Americans are more supportive than blacks and Hispanics.

Read More
1208 Words | 5 Pages

Capital punishment is unconstitutional. It violates the “cruel and unusual” punishment law. Executing someone can vary from being quick and being slow and painful. It also sends the wrong message and is hypocritical. You shouldn’t punish someone who killed another person by killing them to show that killing is wrong.

Read More
915 Words | 4 Pages

According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” Being locked up in a small cells is humane because it fuels many issues that is preventable. Criminal did not have to go through problems like mental issues and physical attacks, but the environment they are locked up subjected inmates to these types of problems. Furthermore, the death penalty is very expensive and does no good for taxpayers who pay tax dollars for the criminals to be

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

There have been many studies done in countries that have the death penalty that show that it is not that effective and some even mention it should be banned. the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment, has no deterrent effect, and crime has in fact been increasing in other countries that have the death penalty in effect. Recently executed murderer David Zink said this just before his death in Missouri: "For those who remain on death row, understand that everyone is going to die. ... Statistically speaking, we have a much easier death than most, so I encourage you to embrace it and celebrate our true liberation before society figures it out and condemns us to life without parole and we too will die a lingering death." in Colarado, inmates spend 23 hours a day locked inside a cell, with little or no communication with other inmates or the outside world.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

Related Topics

Open Document